Jump to content

MobiSev

Members
  • Posts

    607
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MobiSev

  1. Direct Fire? Also, by your description I believe you think the Dana is better in-game?
  2. MobiSev

    SD-10

    No, I do not think it did?
  3. MobiSev

    SD-10

    Finally some progress :) https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4146438#post4146438
  4. Bug: ZTZ-96B getting "stuck" on open terrain When driving it, it felt like it kept getting "stuck" on open terrain. It's almost like hitting an invisible wall or the terrain/obstacles are not in the right place for the tank.. really weird!
  5. What are the differences between the two artillery pieces? Is one more accurate than the other? Which one would you consider to be "better"?
  6. pretty please? We already have the PLAAF livery ;)
  7. how many camos will the tank have?
  8. For Steam, right click DCS, go into the properties section, betas tab, then select the open beta with "public" in it from the drop down menu.
  9. Nah, it just looks like he's flying in the Sukhumi area
  10. Interesting. Can we get a preview?
  11. As said above, select screen with the pod as SOI, then press the IFF interrogate button. Doing this will fix it.
  12. Are you saying that the LD-10 will go after a SAM even if it turns off the radar and moves a little bit? Bc I can assure you that this does not happen with the LD-10 in game. They will do the same thing HARMs will do in this regard....it's just that their damage needs to be reduced, something that Deka has already fixed in the upcoming patch.
  13. I've seen various posts here about it and how it allows you to change coalitions on already created missions. However, when I click the links, they do not lead anywhere. How do you change coalitions if you already created a mission?
  14. that's what it looked like to me as well. The picture said that they believe everything was fine with the 120 and it is performing correctly. Official ED statements here in the forums said that they will be reviewing the missile soon. To me, that implies that they are not sure about the 120 and needed to review it as well as missiles in general, contradicting the picture. That's all I was saying.
  15. My post was mostly directed towards the other comment showing the Facebook post. The picture implied that the "review" had already been completed and nothing will be changed as ED believes it is already performing correctly. It directly contradicts what various official sources have said on the forums that the review would prob be coming sometime next year or so.
  16. Directly contradicts what ED said earlier today on how the team will be reviewing A2A missiles in the coming months
  17. Awesome! Thanks for the reply! But has ED ever considered reaching out to the creators? That was the main point of the question.
×
×
  • Create New...