Jump to content

msalama

Members
  • Posts

    4882
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by msalama

  1. Isn't it a full minute actually? Or that's the limit I've been using between engine starts myself since I seem to recall the manual says so.
  2. Well, everyone seems to have their own subjective definition of concepts such as "truth" and "common sense", and I'll just leave it at that. Thanks.
  3. I wouldn't take anything he says too seriously. The guy is so biased towards the Axis crates that it's not even funny.
  4. Would you mind presenting the statement you base this claim on so we can judge the veracity of it ourselves?
  5. A boost regulator readjustment only? OK, should be trivial enough then.
  6. OK, but doesn't all that depend on ED's (to us unknown) level of modelling detail? I.e. the new supercharger may f.ex. still have the same casing, but the impeller is different etc. and all that needs simulating and/or reimplementing. So even if the change appears trivial, is it really that?
  7. Perhaps, but the weapon system is still functional as it is. Not belittling this in any way, mind; it's just that DCS has much graver problems currently and the focus should be (and hopefully is) on them. That said though, I'd want to see this fixed eventually as well.
  8. As it comes to Anton's internal modelling as well? There could be more than meets the eye here, because what's under the hood is under the hood. And we're not there.
  9. Welcome back mate. Always good to see old hands returning.
  10. I'd pay serious money for a comprehensively modelled A-20. But I wouldn't tolerate leaving it in EA for any length of time so it'd have to be reasonably complete straight away.
  11. I don't think the boost per se is the salient factor here. There're probably more differences there than just enabling the thing.
  12. Key phrase is fuel planning. Suggest you read up on it instead of spamming the board with useless threads.
  13. It's actually quite well modelled per se, it just isn't the later subtype most folks want.
  14. So you need to go back and re-install v1.5... dude.
  15. Guilty? Did I accuse you of something? I'm just asking for evidence, because I'm 100% sure this was never possible. And those who claim always have the burden of proof anyway.
  16. As easy for you to say as it is for me, since we're both first world citizens. And no, not even a whiff of SJW here; just wanted to point out that it's all very relative.
  17. Sure as hell it's needed. Don't like it? Don't fly it. I know I will ;)
  18. As you said in that other thread of yours that you seem to have abandoned now. OK, so I'll just repeat my question here: evidence for this please?
  19. Aha, so it's "definitely"? Evidence please?
  20. Yeah. Would sell my (neighbor's) left kidney to see this happen someday. Would love to do some ground attack ops in an IL-10 for example ;)
  21. There's some MP action available if you're into that though. PvP mostly I've understood.
  22. The override application option doesn't work in v2.x. Still used to work in v1.5, but the underlying GFX engine has changed, so no go anymore.
  23. It has not. Try with a crappy short-throw cheapo JS and you'll see that it's as hellishly hard as always.
×
×
  • Create New...