kotor633

Hi, Even if it's annoying that there have been so many changes lately for the M2k (and for the Harrier): I think it's great that you adapt these modules accordingly. I feel that my interest in the M2k has increased significantly again Thanks for that. But it would be good if we could finally get a corresponding manual. It is well known that Baltic Dragon is there. What is the status like there? Is it possible to estimate when we can count on the updated manuals? Or would it be an option to publish the manual as of now and then, as with the FA-18 or the F-16, to receive a gradually updated manual again and again?

Honestly, are you serious?

The 'old' pilots looked like something out of a bad horror movie. Nice job PC, thanks!

Of course, pilots can turn their heads. How did you get this strange idea that they couldn't do it? I wanted to say that the zoom level is designed to be very generous by default. And is that, in terms of realism, a bit far-fetched. Or is that possible in RL ...?

Yes, that would also be a good addition. But it would also be desirable to allow more realistic values for the range of motion of the head.

You're right. That probably runs under the error 'is not so nice now but also not bad / not a gamebreaker.'

Hello, Find the mistake Happened when you have mounted the Sparrow, for example. If you then want to switch back to the Aim-54, the pylons required for this missile are no longer added. It doesn't matter whether the A or B version of the Tomcat is used. And it doesn't just appear since today's patch. I have already noticed this error in previous DCS versions. I am currently using today's Open Beta.

Since I removed the check mark in the 2.7 version, everything is fine again.

Bingo!

These are points of view where you can no longer fight against it. And are more plausible than said before. Topic done.

It's nice that you pay for it. You also wanted to add this campaign to the Viggen module. So that everyone who buys this module now can play this campaign and not have to buy it separately. It's okay. And the developer of the campaign is sure to be happy about it. But it still doesn't change the fact that those who bought the campaign back then also paid for it. Then, by the way, to find out that you could have saved yourself, even if it was only a few euros / dollars that the campaign had cost. If only one would have waited a bit. You write "Someone still needs to pay for all of that" -> Exactly that is still us customers.

???

Ah i see, this is the kind of direction it should go now. The disgruntled, jealous customer who doesn't allow the others to do it ... Well then all campaigns, modules and maps should be free after a certain period of time. It will be interesting to see these reactions from those who have shopped at ED so far. Conversely, does that mean that we all have to expect that what is paid will be free in the future? Is that what is meant by that? I know that Bunyap does good campaigns, I bought 2 more from him. And what, please, is supposed to seriously injure the developer of the campaign? Or degrading? If you ask around a little in the forum and see the positive feedback he has received for his previous campaigns. Are you serious? It is a fact: The Red Flag for the Viggen was offered for sale for around 10 euros(or dollars?). There were customers who paid for it. Only to find out a few months later that this campaign will be available free of charge for Viggen in the future. Simply that way. I now have the same campaign twice for a module. And what benefit do I get from this? And what do bridge tolls have to do with it? If a toll is paid then the bridge, motorway, whatever can be preserved / renovated with it and remain accessible for the common good. Oh yes: I bought Falcon 4.0 and Allied Forces back then. Now I can enjoy it on Falcon BMS for free. I'm even happy about that, even though I turned to the Falcon 4.0 99 D-Markt at the time. And where, if you please, did a market price drop for a product take place? Almost everyone is aware that a new product initially costs more. By the way, you don't only see this with graphics cards. And is not part of what my statement relates to. What do you want to prove with these statements?

Dies wissen wie man's Geld von den Leuten holt. Wobei, wer's unbedingt zahlen will...

Understood. Question answered, thx

But I still have one question, pure curiosity: Generally no helicopters since you / your team have been geared towards fixed wing aircraft? Or does that only apply to the Mi-24?

Well, at least on the part of Reflected Simulations, nothing will come of this. Which I personally find a shame. Have done really good work so far.

Phew ... that's a shame. But honestly. Phew ... that's a shame. But honestly.

Hi, @Reflected: Is there a possibility or is it planned that you will have a campaign for the Mi-24P? And if so, which map (Caucasus, PG, Syria)?

Personally, I think it's outrageous. First you can pay for the campaign, then it is simply decided that it will be added to the Viggen module as a free addition. And those (including me) who have paid for it will not even be compensated / received or credit or anything like that. Instead, you are only advised to contact ED support. Say: "The customer is again the stupid ..."

This is finally good news regarding the gazelle: And don't forget the newly revised pilots / co-pilots for the Gazelle ... great!

Hello, if I right-click on a house in the mission editor, I can set up a trigger zone. I would be particularly interested in what I can set for values in the Role & Value lines (see attached screenshot). I couldn't find anything about this in DCS User Manual EN 2020.pdf ...

Search in the controller settings for Sensor Select DOWN == Sensor Select Depress

Hm, while we're on the subject: And how about using the module? I mean using the avionics as pilot / co-pilot in single player? With the Mi-24, I think it has been solved very well so far. Quite complex with the F-14 (compared to the Mi-24).