kotor633

Since I removed the check mark in the 2.7 version, everything is fine again.

Bingo!

These are points of view where you can no longer fight against it. And are more plausible than said before. Topic done.

It's nice that you pay for it. You also wanted to add this campaign to the Viggen module. So that everyone who buys this module now can play this campaign and not have to buy it separately. It's okay. And the developer of the campaign is sure to be happy about it. But it still doesn't change the fact that those who bought the campaign back then also paid for it. Then, by the way, to find out that you could have saved yourself, even if it was only a few euros / dollars that the campaign had cost. If only one would have waited a bit. You write "Someone still needs to pay for all of that" -> Exactly that is still us customers.

???

Ah i see, this is the kind of direction it should go now. The disgruntled, jealous customer who doesn't allow the others to do it ... Well then all campaigns, modules and maps should be free after a certain period of time. It will be interesting to see these reactions from those who have shopped at ED so far. Conversely, does that mean that we all have to expect that what is paid will be free in the future? Is that what is meant by that? I know that Bunyap does good campaigns, I bought 2 more from him. And what, please, is supposed to seriously injure the developer of the campaign? Or degrading? If you ask around a little in the forum and see the positive feedback he has received for his previous campaigns. Are you serious? It is a fact: The Red Flag for the Viggen was offered for sale for around 10 euros(or dollars?). There were customers who paid for it. Only to find out a few months later that this campaign will be available free of charge for Viggen in the future. Simply that way. I now have the same campaign twice for a module. And what benefit do I get from this? And what do bridge tolls have to do with it? If a toll is paid then the bridge, motorway, whatever can be preserved / renovated with it and remain accessible for the common good. Oh yes: I bought Falcon 4.0 and Allied Forces back then. Now I can enjoy it on Falcon BMS for free. I'm even happy about that, even though I turned to the Falcon 4.0 99 D-Markt at the time. And where, if you please, did a market price drop for a product take place? Almost everyone is aware that a new product initially costs more. By the way, you don't only see this with graphics cards. And is not part of what my statement relates to. What do you want to prove with these statements?

Dies wissen wie man's Geld von den Leuten holt. Wobei, wer's unbedingt zahlen will...

Understood. Question answered, thx

But I still have one question, pure curiosity: Generally no helicopters since you / your team have been geared towards fixed wing aircraft? Or does that only apply to the Mi-24?

Well, at least on the part of Reflected Simulations, nothing will come of this. Which I personally find a shame. Have done really good work so far.

Phew ... that's a shame. But honestly. Phew ... that's a shame. But honestly.

Hi, @Reflected: Is there a possibility or is it planned that you will have a campaign for the Mi-24P? And if so, which map (Caucasus, PG, Syria)?

Personally, I think it's outrageous. First you can pay for the campaign, then it is simply decided that it will be added to the Viggen module as a free addition. And those (including me) who have paid for it will not even be compensated / received or credit or anything like that. Instead, you are only advised to contact ED support. Say: "The customer is again the stupid ..."

This is finally good news regarding the gazelle: And don't forget the newly revised pilots / co-pilots for the Gazelle ... great!

Hello, if I right-click on a house in the mission editor, I can set up a trigger zone. I would be particularly interested in what I can set for values in the Role & Value lines (see attached screenshot). I couldn't find anything about this in DCS User Manual EN 2020.pdf ...

Search in the controller settings for Sensor Select DOWN == Sensor Select Depress

Hm, while we're on the subject: And how about using the module? I mean using the avionics as pilot / co-pilot in single player? With the Mi-24, I think it has been solved very well so far. Quite complex with the F-14 (compared to the Mi-24).

Guten Morgen, ist euch bekannt ob dieses Feature von Microsoft in DCS World nun Vorteile bringt (ob DCS nun besser mit diesem Feature zurechtkommt)? Was ich bisher darüber im Forum gelesen habe war ja nich gerade berauschend:

Ja, das stimmt ja was du sagst: Die beiden Hanbücher besagen dass das das FAst Alignment nicht so genau ist. Bei diesem einen Youtube Video (welches ich ums verrecken nicht mehr finde...denn dann würde ich den Link dazu noch posten) wurde die Aussage getroffen es gäbe keine Nachteile. Zum einen was stimmt nun? (Wobei ich jetzt sagen würde das der Hersteller eigentlich sein Produkt kennt...) Und sind diese Nachteile in der Simulation integriert dass wir das auch die Auswirkungen in der Simulation merken?

There was an update of the guides for the AV8B & the FA-18C?

@All: Das FAst Alignment gab's natürlich auch schon für die A-10C (engl. Handbuch, Seite 191).

Guten Morgen, eine kurze Frage zu den im Betreff genannten Themen: Klar das Alignment geht mit dieser Funktion schneller, ist also ein klarer Vorteil. Aber gibt es da auch Nachteile? Sprich: Ist das Ganze dann etwas ungenauer und spüren wir im Spiel das dann (also bspw. das wir bei der Navigation einen kleinen Drift merken und wir nicht punktgenau am Waypoint aufschlagen) auch? (Auf youtube in einem deutschen Tutorial zum Alignment der A-10C wurde gesagt es gibt keine Nachteile beim Fast Alignment. Es geht eben nur schneller. Könnt ihr das so verifizieren?) Sollte es dazu hier im Forum schon Diskussionen/Einträge geben dann bitte, gebt mir den Link. Ich lese es dann selbst nach. Danke schonmal vorab für eure Mühe

Mega, danke. Mit diesen Infos kann ich arbeiten. Das war nämlich mein ausschlaggebender Punkt, warum ich diese Fragen gestellt habe: Ich bastle mir, erstmal nur für mich, Missionen zusammen. Und möchte da so nah an Realismus ran wie es in DCS möglich ist.

Danke! Barometrischer & Radarhöhenmesser...da hät ich auch selbst draufkommen können...

Hi, Ich habe eine Frage zu MSL und AGL. Im DCS User Manual EN 2020.pdf dazu steht folgendes: Altitude can be set in meters above Mean Sea Level (MSL) - altitude measured relative to sea level (constant) or in meters Above Ground Level (AGL) - altitude measured directly over the ground below. Because terrain elevations vary throughout the theater, setting an AGL altitude will result in the aircraft following the terrain contours along the route leg for the waypoint. On the other hand, setting an MSL altitude will result in level flight at the set altitude, unless obstructed by terrain (such as when attempting to maintain a low-level MSL altitude in mountainous terrain). Wann nutzt man AGL, wann MSL? Wie ist das in DCS: Im Missions Editor, wenn ich mit dem Mauszeiger über einem Punkt bin, wird mir die Höhe in MSL angezeigt? Wenn ich nun als altitude type AGL verwenden möchte wie rechne ich das von MSL nach AGL um? Über jede konstruktive Information würde ich mich freue und sage schon mal Danke! Gruß