kotor633

Hello @ all, one question: I haven't read anywhere in the past changelogs that the F-5E Aggressors ACM Campaign has been upgraded to DCS version 2.7. Or I just overlooked it ... If this is not the case, can we owners of this campaign expect an adjustment soon?

Oops ... yeah, I guess I didn't do the right thing ... Ok, the B has 28,200 pounds of thrust. I don't quite understand that with the indicator. But I take from draconus statement that the difference is so small / fine that the effort to provide 2 separate profiles for A & B would not be worthwhile for HB.

Hallo, short question: Do you know whether there is something similar for the F-16C like the NATOP documents for the F-14, FA-18, etc.? And if so, are they available for free? Thank you

What ist SATAL???

It would be nice if there could finally be a DCS version where you can actually talk about stable. Only new features are required ... as soon as a module from one manufacturer is out, the next question is asked ... etc. And in the same breath they complain why this and why this (again) does not work correctly ... and then of course the standard slogan 'You can't make money with bug fixing' ... Sure, ED and Co. do bug fixing. Good this way.

That should be this indicator for it (I'm not an F-14 expert, but see manual, page 208):

I once addressed the possible issue to Bignewy with the request to forward it to the Belsimtek team.

Great video, great explanation! (For people like me who have no idea about this subject).

It was probably saved at the wrong end ... Until recently, I also had this plastic crap from Thrustmaster, until I treated myself to the Crosswind. Removing and reassembling the spring is no longer an issue.

Thank you!

No reaction? Hasn't anyone noticed that yet?

Hi, thanks for the feedback. But I guess I wasn't precise with what I was getting at. I'm mainly concerned with the engine. The A has about 22,000 pounds of thrust, the B twice as much. In addition, the A has 5 different afterburner levels, which the B is missing. There was the following page: https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/153959-tm-warthog-ab-detent-curve/ For the B variant, I can create a user profile here. But I cannot imagine that this can be transferred 1: 1 to the A variant. Shouldn't there be at least 2 separate options for profile setting here?

Thanks for the videos. In the video for the Mil Mi-17, I think it's amazing how often the trimmer button is pressed here. But related to DCS: That only works if I have set 'Default' in the options for the trimmer mode ... doesn't it?

Yes, please!! Because what we've got so far is, to put it politely, a joke ...

Ah, okay. Thank you.

Hello, Is it actually planned by HB to implement separate control profiles for the F-14 A & B? At least for operating the engines. Since these are 2 different engines. Or am I wrong?

I mean this one:

Hello, Hasn't a campaign been announced for the Mig-21? Which should be published with the release of DCS Version 2.7? Or did I misunderstand something?

Come down, I didn't come here for an argument or a confrontation either! Has there been a change in the FM at all? At least I can't read anything about it in the changelog ... Secondly, I did say I had been reading up (the Yefim Gordon book) on how the aircraft handled. -> I can't read that anywhere in your first post. (I read Michael Normann's book Mi-24. Originally published by Motorbuch Verlag.) The irony is, they seemingly changed everything but the ocillation about 120km that makes it so hard to put the gunsight on target. Which considering the aircraft is reputedly more accurate at high speeds, again seems contary to written accounts. -> Hm ... I can't agree with that for myself. I cannot determine this behavior. By the way: I don't know if it is possible in real life, but with the Mi-8 with the appropriate height & speed I can also get a barrel roll in DCS ...

Hi, how do you know that it behaves like Apache? Are you an apache pilot? And have you ever already flown the Mi-24 in RL? Based on what facts do you make this statement? Regardless, the module has only been out for a few weeks. If the FM does not yet fit ... one can assume that the ED will make appropriate adjustments sooner or later. Since you ask for the opinions of others: I am so far completely satisfied with the one that has been delivered so far, the module is already a lot more fun for me than some other modules at this stage of its development. Whereby I find that, in addition to the FM, the corresponding hardware also plays an essential role. I previously had the Thrustmaster TFRP pedals and no extensions on my Warthog stick. Now I have a 7.5cm extension and MFG Crosswind pedals, where you can easily relax the spring. The Mi-24, Ka-50, UH-1 and Mi-8 now fly MUCH more precisely.

Naja hoffen wir mal das es nicht so ein Hin- & her wird bei beim AV8B...Aber lassen wir die doch jetzt einfach mal machen. Ich bin der Meinung die Zusammenarbeit mit HB wird dem Modul gut tun und das Entwicklerteam wird das Richtig tun. Dieses ständige spekulieren & was-wird-vielleicht-kommen bringt doch niemandem was...

Hello, a question: 10 or 6. What is the difference? What is the benefit for me in DCS when status 6 is reached in the alignment?

Maybe this video:

Also das sind echt wahnsinns Neuigkeiten! Und für mich einen Grund die Entwicklung des EF genauer mitzuverfolgen.