Spirale

Thx Cobra for your answer to Goblin. But what mean "revamped Maverick guidance"????

Hi, What does it mean? Will the RB75 be able to lock a random object on the ground? Thx

Thx a lot Hobel, your photos are very informative The MK18 is a hollow charge specially designed for amor penetration. Why the CBU 97 does better than the MK18 in this area?

@Hobel: Is the bomblet damage, in your one bomblet test, enough that i close this topic as "solved"? I used the CBU97 yesterday again and i find that they are much more efficient that the MK20/CBU99.

A CBU 97 is way effective than a MK20 ( one of the deadliest weapon for cas missions in DCS). IRL it is like this BUT wayyyyy more (like it is in DCS) a MK20 certainly not IMHO. However this MK20 is anemic in DCS since ages...

MK20 nearly no damages.trk

Surely true but there is difference between employed weapon "IRL" and weapon simulated effect

Hello Suke, It is what i mean: they aren't effective at all ( or very poorly) against armored vehicules ( of course it is pretty normal against heavy ones). MK20 should be more effective .

I wish this weapon (on par with CBU 99) to be more effective against light armor). Nowaday i find this weapon very frustrating in term of results... Thx

I haven't finished your campaign yet Sedlo but i have to say this: It is a blast to fly ! Voices over, immersive flying time, scenarii all this for me sound like a huge " worth flying this campaign"!! I an't recommand it more Good job Sedlo ps: on par with payed campaigns for me

Yes my bad it is a burning animation not a "destroyed" burning animation . @Northstar: you still can't destroy the CC with one GBU31/3 with a F16? Why is it plane dependent? @Hobel: i will test again with the fuze set to "GRND" . However it seems logical to me to put a delay on the fuze so that it has time to penetrate

We know one thing: with one JSOW C the CC is out. But why the GBU31/3, fuze set to Ground/ delay is unable to destroy the same CC? Strange no?

Interesting too, i wonder why it would be more effective with the JSOW C than with the GBU31/3? I hope one day we will have real like blast radius and damages / munitions. This is , for me, critical for immersion. And it is normally NOT dependant to the type of plane....

Strange, i don't have the same results. JSWO one hit and CC is destroyed...Or may be am i missing something? The other track is for the GBU31/3, CC seems to be destroyed too....so i wonder why, in, my first post, CC was intact?? JSOWVSCC.trk GBU313VSCC.trk

Did you take the "breach" version of the JSOW?

Thx Hobel, but i wonder why it needs 2 GBU31 to destroy it while only one JSOW reach this goal. For a 2 bombs run with the GBU31, often they don't fall on the same point...But that's another story...Perhaps i do something weird...

Hi, I did a simple test: i wanted to destroy a Command Center with a GBU31/3 with penetrator head. Results: This GBU31/3 is unable to penetrate and destruct the Command Center ( postly underground structure). I found that is possible to destruct with an F18 and a Jsow Breach... Is it like like that IRL? Is the GBU31/3 unable to destruct such a target meanwhile the JSOW can? Thx for your replies

Thx Tholozor, i would have never though that since the Harrier already has this feature.

Hi, When i drop a bomb i have no tone. Yet my OSB " Tone" is boxed. I tried Tone 1 and Tone 2 with no result. The rotators on tour helphe left console are On. Thx for help

I feel it is impossible to stop the roll input like in this video IRL. This one shows a clear roll input and a clear stop. In our Harrier it feels that you can do a clear roll input but be unable to stop this roll with such a clear movement...It is even worse with a 720 roll...

Another little detail that demonstrate what was said above: In the F14 topic, Iron Mike is greatly present, nearly every days ( and thx to him to be so kind, it's very pleasant to read a dev every day for a consumer). This behavior of a developer greatly contributes to emphasis the life of the F14 forum, attract people in it, make their interest grow and motivates them maybe buy this module... Meanwhile in the Viggen forum.....not a single post ( except mine today) in the last 15 days...I am not saying that no dev has come to expose the progress of the Viggen in recent month, i want to highlight a flagrant imbalance which leads to the desertification of this " Viggen forum" and probably demotivate new potential pilots to purchase this module... Make your own conclusions...

Thx for your reply Cobra. That's being done you said " we are not superhuman"....True BUT you explain to us that you cannot take car of the two module à at the same time. while I also understand this, i know you are yourselves your own bosses and you are responsible about your decision. You are not superhuman but you choose to always prioritise the F14. That's the problem... Since not monthes but years now we, Viggen fans, pilots, enthousiasts, are waiting for a "balance of care" between Viggen and F14: nope only one side is treated....The Viggen receive crumbs...Look at updates history: hundreds of lines for the Tomcat, crumbs for the Viggen... So yes your are not superhuman but responsibto to not alternate the improvments . On my side , IRL i am not demanding but this time i am fed to always read the same things from HB about the Viggen and i fully agree with Snappy: the Viggen is without a doubt a black sheep...No wonders why the Viggen remains a non popular module... Regards ps: and who cares bout dynamic numbers on tail really? FM@high speed, flying without wings, drag indexes and so on are way more criticals..

As always, full information about the F14 but the viggen? What is scheduled? It would be kind and pleasant to know " something" about the Viggen in the future DCS 2.8 update. We already know that "cosmetics" will come but what about damage model? The Viggen till able to fly without wings? I mean real improvements. I really have the bad feeling the Viggen is set aside for the benefit of the F14....I hope i am wrong... Thx for your reply HB

Thx a lot kercheiz