Jump to content

Spirale

Members
  • Posts

    489
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Spirale

  1. Mission 10 is surprising!!!! No spoiler now but it was amazing how i was happy to board in such " special" conditions: Thx Sedlo, good word! I can not recommand enough your campaign! ps: now i know even more the F18 and his subtulties
  2. It is the mission scenario You must land at Acrotiri
  3. This video is a beauty Thx Badger for your work, i'll purchase your campaign: cheers!!
  4. Thx HB ! Is it me or the Viggen seems to be slow now ( with a normal payload 4x RB75B + tank)...Even with PC1 it seems to have way more drag...perhaps i am wrong with my feelings
  5. Hi, is there a DTC programmed for the F18 in a near futur? F16 wil have one; i wonder if the F18 will have one too. Thx
  6. Thx a lot Tholozor, i'll give it a try
  7. Thx a lot Sedlo, you are becoming a reference with BD, thx again for your hard word
  8. Hi, Does the F18 have a radar expand mode like in the F16? I can not find it in the 18 and wonder if it exists IRL... Thx
  9. Would it be possible to mod this incredible campaign for the F16 on a base next to the carrier please? I like to compare this 2 jets ( 18 and 16) both in perfomance and confort on a busy environment
  10. I like this kind of detail, this makes the mission more "pro" and immersive Thx Sedlo
  11. Thx Cobra for your answer to Goblin. But what mean "revamped Maverick guidance"????
  12. Hi, What does it mean? Will the RB75 be able to lock a random object on the ground? Thx
  13. Thx a lot Hobel, your photos are very informative The MK18 is a hollow charge specially designed for amor penetration. Why the CBU 97 does better than the MK18 in this area?
  14. @Hobel: Is the bomblet damage, in your one bomblet test, enough that i close this topic as "solved"? I used the CBU97 yesterday again and i find that they are much more efficient that the MK20/CBU99.
  15. A CBU 97 is way effective than a MK20 ( one of the deadliest weapon for cas missions in DCS). IRL it is like this BUT wayyyyy more (like it is in DCS) a MK20 certainly not IMHO. However this MK20 is anemic in DCS since ages...
  16. MK20 nearly no damages.trk
  17. Surely true but there is difference between employed weapon "IRL" and weapon simulated effect
  18. Hello Suke, It is what i mean: they aren't effective at all ( or very poorly) against armored vehicules ( of course it is pretty normal against heavy ones). MK20 should be more effective .
  19. I wish this weapon (on par with CBU 99) to be more effective against light armor). Nowaday i find this weapon very frustrating in term of results... Thx
  20. I haven't finished your campaign yet Sedlo but i have to say this: It is a blast to fly ! Voices over, immersive flying time, scenarii all this for me sound like a huge " worth flying this campaign"!! I an't recommand it more Good job Sedlo ps: on par with payed campaigns for me
  21. Yes my bad it is a burning animation not a "destroyed" burning animation . @Northstar: you still can't destroy the CC with one GBU31/3 with a F16? Why is it plane dependent? @Hobel: i will test again with the fuze set to "GRND" . However it seems logical to me to put a delay on the fuze so that it has time to penetrate
  22. We know one thing: with one JSOW C the CC is out. But why the GBU31/3, fuze set to Ground/ delay is unable to destroy the same CC? Strange no?
  23. Interesting too, i wonder why it would be more effective with the JSOW C than with the GBU31/3? I hope one day we will have real like blast radius and damages / munitions. This is , for me, critical for immersion. And it is normally NOT dependant to the type of plane....
  24. Strange, i don't have the same results. JSWO one hit and CC is destroyed...Or may be am i missing something? The other track is for the GBU31/3, CC seems to be destroyed too....so i wonder why, in, my first post, CC was intact?? JSOWVSCC.trk GBU313VSCC.trk
×
×
  • Create New...