Spirale

Interesting too, i wonder why it would be more effective with the JSOW C than with the GBU31/3? I hope one day we will have real like blast radius and damages / munitions. This is , for me, critical for immersion. And it is normally NOT dependant to the type of plane....

Strange, i don't have the same results. JSWO one hit and CC is destroyed...Or may be am i missing something? The other track is for the GBU31/3, CC seems to be destroyed too....so i wonder why, in, my first post, CC was intact?? JSOWVSCC.trk GBU313VSCC.trk

Did you take the "breach" version of the JSOW?

Thx Hobel, but i wonder why it needs 2 GBU31 to destroy it while only one JSOW reach this goal. For a 2 bombs run with the GBU31, often they don't fall on the same point...But that's another story...Perhaps i do something weird...

Hi, I did a simple test: i wanted to destroy a Command Center with a GBU31/3 with penetrator head. Results: This GBU31/3 is unable to penetrate and destruct the Command Center ( postly underground structure). I found that is possible to destruct with an F18 and a Jsow Breach... Is it like like that IRL? Is the GBU31/3 unable to destruct such a target meanwhile the JSOW can? Thx for your replies

Thx Tholozor, i would have never though that since the Harrier already has this feature.

Hi, When i drop a bomb i have no tone. Yet my OSB " Tone" is boxed. I tried Tone 1 and Tone 2 with no result. The rotators on tour helphe left console are On. Thx for help

I feel it is impossible to stop the roll input like in this video IRL. This one shows a clear roll input and a clear stop. In our Harrier it feels that you can do a clear roll input but be unable to stop this roll with such a clear movement...It is even worse with a 720 roll...

Another little detail that demonstrate what was said above: In the F14 topic, Iron Mike is greatly present, nearly every days ( and thx to him to be so kind, it's very pleasant to read a dev every day for a consumer). This behavior of a developer greatly contributes to emphasis the life of the F14 forum, attract people in it, make their interest grow and motivates them maybe buy this module... Meanwhile in the Viggen forum.....not a single post ( except mine today) in the last 15 days...I am not saying that no dev has come to expose the progress of the Viggen in recent month, i want to highlight a flagrant imbalance which leads to the desertification of this " Viggen forum" and probably demotivate new potential pilots to purchase this module... Make your own conclusions...

Thx for your reply Cobra. That's being done you said " we are not superhuman"....True BUT you explain to us that you cannot take car of the two module à at the same time. while I also understand this, i know you are yourselves your own bosses and you are responsible about your decision. You are not superhuman but you choose to always prioritise the F14. That's the problem... Since not monthes but years now we, Viggen fans, pilots, enthousiasts, are waiting for a "balance of care" between Viggen and F14: nope only one side is treated....The Viggen receive crumbs...Look at updates history: hundreds of lines for the Tomcat, crumbs for the Viggen... So yes your are not superhuman but responsibto to not alternate the improvments . On my side , IRL i am not demanding but this time i am fed to always read the same things from HB about the Viggen and i fully agree with Snappy: the Viggen is without a doubt a black sheep...No wonders why the Viggen remains a non popular module... Regards ps: and who cares bout dynamic numbers on tail really? FM@high speed, flying without wings, drag indexes and so on are way more criticals..

As always, full information about the F14 but the viggen? What is scheduled? It would be kind and pleasant to know " something" about the Viggen in the future DCS 2.8 update. We already know that "cosmetics" will come but what about damage model? The Viggen till able to fly without wings? I mean real improvements. I really have the bad feeling the Viggen is set aside for the benefit of the F14....I hope i am wrong... Thx for your reply HB

Thx a lot kercheiz

Thx Kercheiz ( your pseudo reminds me the mighty Bretagne^^). IRL i suppose pilots use to push the thumb button?

Hi, Could someone explain to me what is the difference between this two functions. For me they do the same but are placed in a strange fashion in the mapping menu. - PSIC switch is a small "palette" located onthe top righ of the stick ( hotas) but not in the hotas section of the mapping list instead located in the main menu. -On the other hand the PSIC/STT function is a button and located on the left console but in the "hotas "mapping menu but not a fonction of the stick.... What are there differences exactly? Thx

+1000

Allow all planes of a package to take off at a desired time whatever if they have to ramp, whaterver the lenght of the taxiway ( with few seconds spacing between the different flights)

Thx a lot

Thx a lot I find the F16 data more handy, you look at the contact and it shows altitude.

Hi, Is it possible to display the contact altitude on the datalink contact like in the F16 one? Thx

Very kind from you thx Baltic:) I'am eager to try OC. EW3 will be great for the Harrier i bet. Solo i often train over the same mission and switching from A10CII and Harrier. A pleasure! I hardly believe that EW3 will be fantastic for the Harrier

No payload....3000 lbs fuel only....no bombs at all

Dear Baltic, As title says, would it be possible to do this topnotch campaign for the Harrier please? The Harrier, as you perfectly kow, is able to fullfill with brio the A10 missions. Cheers

+1, impossible to do in DCS whatever the payload

Thx you Myse for your wonderfull work, i hope HB 'll integrate this one, you deserve it!