Jump to content

Spirale

Members
  • Posts

    503
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Spirale

  1. Spirale

    And now?

    Hello, is there any road map planned? Any news about a complete manual?; a new campaign ( estimated date of release)?; possible additions? This module is great and deserve more attention. Thx
  2. Thx Myse for your hard work
  3. It's huge and make the Viggen better. Many many thanks HB for this piece of art ps: just a little wish for the next update is about the akan'sbullet correction, they hit too short pps: static object now radar visible= i am happy
  4. Simply amazing, thx!! The radios FR 22 and 24 will be complete now and a pleasure to use. Thx HB for this incoming update, you make my day. The Viggen is a wonderfull jet and very endearing.
  5. I know Machalot BUT, for me ( only if you want/accept), the RB15 have his own detection system in terminal guidance phase. This is why i wonder why it is impossible to use it againt a bridge for example. I hope i am clear enough. Imagine a 100m long ship and a 100m long metallic bridge/ What's the difference for the missile ( understand : why it is impossible IRL and/ or in DCS)? For me ( again) it's a question.
  6. Thx for your reply Myse, but overall it's kinda weird not knowing why he can't spot some other "solid" than a simple ship. In DCS there are tons of discussions about weapons employment and often a result/solution are given (after pages of discussions). For the RB15F the mystery is here.
  7. Agree with you with hypthetics colateral damages...but...Is it possible to target other things than ships with RB15F was my question in DCS? I really don't see any reason why it can do it . What are the limitations?
  8. Yes, why not but what about waypoints for the RB15F? It can follow a route so i expect it can hit a waypoint, a target? Speculations ok but....what are the real reasons?
  9. For "our" RB15F: What are the limitations that prevent this missile from heading towards a land target?
  10. Thx a lot
  11. Hello , i often wondered why RB15's couldn't impact a terrestrial object? A ship is a solid, a building is a solid. A ship is mostly a metal structure, a bridge is a metallic structure often. What is the best explanation for this paradox? Thx for your replies
  12. Thx Mike for this head up...appreciate this. I guess we'll be happy in december even if i am bit frustrated at the moment.
  13. I know but i 've spoken in general kind of effects in DCS
  14. Thx a lot for this wonderfull info , Harrier rocks!
  15. I agree and disagree: MK20 for example are quite ineffective yes but CBU 97 are effective for me
  16. Yesterday was the October 14th, blessed day for the Viggen update...Result= no update, not even a word from ED to explain what's going on...
  17. exciting to read : thx Renhanxue
  18. Thx for this Machalot
  19. nowadays what are the biggest differences/ lacks between, lets say, 15-30km and 60 km? I would like to add that your daily presence on "our beloved Viggen forum" is a great pleaseure, make me feel the Viggen is alive
  20. Thx Mike for your reply
  21. I've posted above, no problem to see active tanks but not possible to see "objects" tanks. However thx for your help
  22. I can see tank as active ones. If they are "objects" i can not see them. Is there a way to define an antenna elevation cursor? mentally like i do? or is there another way? Thx
  23. I did tests over Caucasus on the dark shore, perhaps it's me but i can not see tanks even if i tune with finesse the radar, because the ground appears very dark and tanks appears always dark on the radar (no WHT mode). I'll try again.
×
×
  • Create New...