motoadve

39PPD with motion smoothing any value below 0.7 for peripheral DCS crashes Without motion smoothing, you can put any value for peripheral and no crashes. Currently running 1.2 Focus, and 0.7 in peripheral, would be ideal if we could use a lower value here ,so Motion Smoothing can take advantage of some performance..

Ok, so PD in game to 1.2 increases the resolution of the whole screen, then you add DFR , focus 1.0 (no changes) Pheripheral 0.7 lowers the res on the pheripheral area from 1.2= 84% DFR Focus to 1.2 increases the resolution where your eyes look, 0.7 pheripheral reduces the resolution to the pheripheral area from 1.0 so should have a better performance moving the values in DFR =70% Now I read somewhere the PD in game every.1 you add is like 20% resolution? Is there a file where we can see the resolution I am playing at? (I dont use OXR tool kit) so I have the same resolution as with 1.2 PD in game ? need to know what value I should change focus to.

Is increasing focus to a value above 1 the same as increasing pixel density in the VR tab in game? What we are doing is increasing resolution, or is there a difference?

This is the main point. And yes the bubble canopy on the Spit might as well be just a flat canopy, with current DCS no limits we have more than a bubble canopy in all the planes , since we can stick our head out. IL2 I got used to it quickly, but it is too restrictive, for example, I cannot see the fuel contents of the P51 fuel gauges, so doing it right, with the limits where the head cannot get out of the cockpit would be great, but that you can still move around and be able to see fuel gauges like in the P51, I am all in for it.

Yes I think you are right, and it uses SimShaker, correct?

Seen the box since the very first flight I did with DFR, does not bothers me at all and hardly noticeable, a very small price to pay compared to the better performance we get with DFR.

I have bass shakers, they work pretty good, only compliant is I don't get hits effects in any of the WWII planes, does this seat gives hit effects?

Use SRS and fly with your coworker or someone as a wingman, its a much better experience, and eventually I recommend you guys join a squad. I am new to DCS and after a week of flying on my own , joined I/JG7 squad and now really I am enjoying the experience.

Is there a way to have auto connect, without having DCS out of focus? then have to remove VR headset, click ok, put back VR headset. I start SRS before DCS, and connects, but then when in game and when starting the multiplayer session I get a new menu , and that gets DCS out of focus. Auto Connect prompt should be ON or OFF?

Will this plane have the detailed damage model as the other warbirds in DCS?

Was my same experience with 45FPS locked and Motion Smoothing, was not impressed and still not impressed, Automatic does help, give it a try. I have peripheral at 0.6 and definitely, its performing great and 99.9 % of the time I don't see the edges.

I never bothered with OXTRK, just plain FDR.

Guys give it a try with Automatic VSync and motion smoothing, works better than 45 on my system, (4090, i9 10900K) almost perfect, now and them some slow downs but some epic and smooth dogfights in WWII Channel map, a lot less artifacts than with 45 locked , also smoother in 39 PPD, and 1.2 in DCS, looks super crisp.

So the 109 campaign P51 Blue nosed bastards Spitfire IX The Big Show. Would be nice to get new campaigns for the P47,P51,Mosquito, Spit,190 and 109 in the new Normandy map.

I am enjoying this, today flew it for the first time in a 190, do missions change? Or is the same mission over and over again? Today's date was May 19th 1944

With DFR enabled and Motion Smoothing locked at 45FPS finally is almost working perfect, still planes look a bit blurry to the sides, but better than before for sure. Problem is that if we reduce Pheripheral below 1.0 to gain a bit more performance DCS crashes. If we could reduce Pheripheral below 1.0, maybe we could get the performance we need to be able to run Motion Smoothing better. I guess eventually it will happen.

Pimax no thanks, whatever they make , I wont buy again from them. By the way the Aero with FDR activated in MT Beta in DCS has amazing clarity and performance.

I reduced peripheral value and saw a pretty good performance increase. DCS crashes if I use motion smoothing, same as it happens to you. DFR definitely increases performance, the reduced resolution in the peripheral area its hard to notice, the performance increase its worth it.

What am I missing? null

I just tried 1.1 with Motion Smoothness and no crashes

Will Open XR toolkit increase performance? I am pretty happy with how DCS looks in the Varjo Aero, not bother to modify the look, but if this can increase performance then I am in.

Like this mod a lot 0.2 was too much for me, looked a bit unrealistic, I am happy with 0.6

Why there are no hit effects on warbirds? Is there a way to make them work? apart from this all works perfect, but hit effects are needed.

Currently I have an HP Omen with an i9 10900 K, and a 4090, DCS runs decent in VR. Want to retire this PC and make my working PC use a 2080Ti and keep the 4090 for my gaming PC. Which would be the best Intel processor /motherboard combo for DCS?

Which would be the Intel best processor to run DCS? 13900K?