Vfa-81 Fix

Excellent! Looking forward to the release :)

Point track is working. It does so only on moving targets and inside 20nm though and it´s missing the underline beneath PT.

Put a Marsden Mat FARP at a Road and you´re done. Can roll on even with full fuel and 2 tanks, rearm to your liking and roll off, then use the road as runway. No support Vehicles needed and only a single tile to align.

There is hope though! Hope that all the Cry Babies learnt their lesson and will not buy the F-15E once it is available. Hope that consequently they´ll stay clear of the then to be F-15E Sub Forum. Hope that we won´t get a new set of CB´s. And finally, hope that we´ll have a much happier place then. Back on topic: I had so hoped (see, there is hope everywhere) to fly the F-15E by March or April and I´m good for a F-16 style release. Maybe RAZBAM would consider a limited run "Fanboy Super-Early-Access" Release.

I wish we had a "Wishlist" Sub-Forum like in the F-16/ Hornet Section. If we did, I would wish for the "Resolved Bugs" and the "Public Bug Tracker" to be removed. Don´t know if they ever did server their purpose, but for sure they don´t right now and thus should go away. Think about it RAZBAM.

Works just fine here with the WH pretty much spot on, just tested. @Tanö This topic did come up before and if you manage to get not only the same angle, but also the same focal lenght you´ll notice that the difference is only marginal. And it does not affect Hover performance in any way whatsoever.

At least in part the CAS page will be usable/ populated with the introduction of JDAMs. It remains to be seen if this can be used for other weapons/ deliveries and if other players will be able to populate your CAS page.

It´s so subtle, it can only be seen by those who know where it is. ;)

I´m more concerned about the gun reticle being above the FPM.

August 2019. https://www.dvidshub.net/image/5700194/340th-ears-conducts-aerial-refueling-operations

Not me.

We did this years ago in the A-10 with good effect. And we could even use the computer to do it, no skill was needed.

Not for a Jedi. Each update makes it harder and harder to find something to complain about. Now it´s Friction and Buttons. Next is Fuses and Oxygen. Finally Air Condition and Restrainers.

Looked at and can confirm both AFC as well as Altitude Hold work as advertised - no problems at all.

Real life is of no concern for many DCS Pilots.

"An aircraft" or the Harrier? The Harrier you can place anywhere cause it uses the same logic as an Helicopter. You can not taxi over grass though, but any road will do and right from Mission start if you so wish.

Harrier can TO from every road already tough, no mod needed for that. Not really "anywhere", but close. The tricky part s the refueling/ rearming.

The VREST page is active and populated as soon as you turn on battery power.

A Dynamic Campaign with the current AI is of no use to me.

Why do you even think you have to defend yourself here?

Look! A fake MARINE is planejacking a Harrier :helpsmilie:

This can be set as a special option in the Mission Editor, but I think it´s not working right now. The toggle via the ODU only changes the displayed time below the HUD and will blank out after a short time.

https://old.reddit.com/r/hoggit/comments/byaxlv/ccip_full_implementation_is_now_done_for_the/

Thank you for pointing that out! Now, looking at the store page of the Harrier: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/shop/modules/av8bna/ we can see that everything - except the JDAM type of weapons - is already implemented and just needs some refinement. Thus one could say that "concern over Harrier development" is really not called for at all. Of course, whether implementation of said features aligns with your personal view of what a module "should" have is another story.

Back then when ED implemented the PFM for the F-15 I made a 90+ mins roundtrip at different speeds and altitudes and came home within 300 pounds of what I´ve calculated (which might be down to my sloppy flying). I know they made some adjustments to the performance and power output after that and I have never tested again, but at least at one time, and for the F-15, it was pretty much spot on.