Jump to content

Renko

Members
  • Posts

    203
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Renko

  1. May i ask for more info about this added feature: "Added new features for JF17 thanks to Uboats / Deka unlocked by a later DCS patch" I see that we have a third radio on the JF17 named VHF/UHF Expansion, but i cant find info about it on the forums. Or how to change its freq Is a new radio that its going to be added?
  2. Answer with same phrase but using bold at the end? I dont know if you are make fun of me... But i understand you dont see my point. So i will leave it there Very dissappointing Good day
  3. While having feedback is great, you guys must know wich is the best way to optimize development. So you can get the Hornet out of EA and beyond, in the best and fastest way. And we can show more interest, for example, in having the AG radar instead of the ATFLIR. But at the end that could not be the best or fastest way to get both. I hope you see my point and why i expressed those concerns Regards
  4. I really dont know what to think. Now you are doing a survey. Meaning what, that the features with most votes are going to be prioritized? That doesnt sound very good, its supposed to be done by the develop team. Not dictated by popularity but from what you are working and can achive with your team. You should know better than us about that Sorry to say but doesnt sound very professional if you do that
  5. Thanks for the answer It would be good to add a line on the manual, warning that POINT will only work if initiated on WHOT. For future and current users of the LANTIRN :)
  6. I found out that if you try to do Point Track using BHOT, you cannot achive it. But from WHOT you can. Is that a expected behaviour in the LANTIRN? I cannot find anything on the manual. The only remote mention i found is this one: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3851484&postcount=27 Please, can some developer confirm that?
  7. Well after the last hotfix this still remains unplayable, with same 10FPS. Let me asure you that i had a good settings for perfomance, im not one of those that just put all in max. I had 60FPS stable (60Hz is my native monitor) in both SP and MP. And I have more than the recomended system requirements. While it wont hurt review the missions, there is clearly something wrong with the actual state of the 2.5.6. If you see the GPU or CPU usage, you can see something is not fine. Lets hope it doesnt take much time to got back to 2.5.5 performance
  8. I can confirm this. Before on the 2.5.5 had 60FPS stable. Now it doesnt go up than 10FPS UnPlayable
  9. How could i have missed that? Maybe because i didnt flew it in years Thanks for the tip :thumbup:
  10. Question Do you think that the HUD in the new cockpit have a low bright value? I mean, i tried some of instant action missions and in all is the same. HUD is barely or not visible. Here is an example with the "Ka50 attack insurgents" instant action. Where you can cleary see this. With other aircraft with HUD this doesnt happens My gamma setting is 2.2, wich match my gamma monitor which is 2.2
  11. Sorry, i only have the new build. And i would go back, but with the speed that provides ED and this heavy weight update (11,3Gb compressed, and 34Gb uncompressed) it would take 4hours minimum But i can assure you it was fine. Yesterday night i flew with my VSquad in the RIO seat and i didnt got those FPS.
  12. No, its just by changing seats. I tried the white flood and i dont recall a performance hit. Lower than those 45FPS
  13. Like the title said. I have 60FPS stable (its my native MHz monitor refresh rate) on the pilot seat. When i switch to RIO i got 45FPS I tried to do repair, restart, no mods, with mods, different maps, etc etc Same result Yesterday it was fine Anyone with same issue?
  14. Oh, i see. Didnt saw it on the first post or the description Thx :thumbup:
  15. I dont know whats happening but i keep getting this message at start. All scripts seems to be deactivated. I tried even to do a repair of DCS, still same results. In Caucasus and Gulf missions Anyone with same problem?
  16. Again have to come back after trying a mission, to get intructions and answers to be able to success. Intead of flying. Its very very frustrating And im good with helos. Not a total expert, but good I flied over those vics three times, tree top level, fast. Nothing happened... Maybe because the first pass was from W, as i came from the LZ. Maybe it broken some triggers Snapshot of their location > But before i had to try to land blind on the mountain. I mean with almost zero visibility This is a snapshot. Cant see nothing, and the LZ its more high than where that capture was taken I dont know about those vehicles, but please. Move up that cloud layer. It only need to be up just a bit. And for the player to know where to land on the mountain, you can remind him that its the same LZ where you first land on mission 5-1 I know its hard to fine tune those missions, but its getting an average of 4-5 attempts to success. And that after coming to check the forum. And not because of flying skills Its a great campaign, and I dont want this to be an easy campaing, but in my humble opinion it only need some fine tunning to be a better player experience. P.S.: sorry if that may sound rought, im only trying to give some feedback
  17. I got to say that i´m really enjoying the campaign so far, even the demanding parts. But today i tried again, and again got killed by a Ka50, on the first Manpad drop. While i was flying less than 10feet from ground and meters from the watchtower Its really frustrating having to keep repeating the mission because of that. Im going to repeat one more time but... Edit: Fourth time the same, Killed. The Ka50 approaches so easy to the watchtower. Meanwhile the manpad miss every single time And the other UH1 seem not to bother the Ka50, just my UH1 got targeted Edit 2: Finally ! Somehow the Ka50s got scared away this time The only issue for me to complete this mission were those Ka50s
  18. I understood the instructions on the second run. Its not very clear on the voice over When you get to the zone and land the first time on the orange smoke up the hill, thats the point you need to pass. Keep going straight from there to S-SE, keeping the hill and enemy on your left. Then a message appears telling you to land on the first tree on your left WARNING, later on you need to go up the hill to the watch tower. And there are Ka50 on the zone that will kill you. Its frustrating getting killed by those after fighting with the instructons. I got killed both times. One with Vikhr, the other with cannon I think putting those Ka50 there are a overkill, and not good for the player experience
  19. Thank you, there is no hurry at all :thumbup: I was just wondering if it was an error on my side
  20. Very glad to hear and see all that love to the Viggen :) May i ask one thing regarding the "Red Flag 16-2 Viggen Campaign". I search inside DCS and its not activated for download, or in the Campaign menu either. Is that campaign only for new buyers? Or planned for the future?
  21. The WIN10 update is the 1903 or the new 1909 ?
  22. I want to bring into the discussion one thing. In TOO page you have TOO1 and TOO2. And it supposed to work as two memory slot for storage coordinates. But right know they are not working Its already on the TOO page but does not work. PP1-6 on the PP page, are working. I wonder why not fix that and give us something that we can work on TOO. Making possible to do two drop to different tgts in one single pass, using the TGT.
  23. Sad to hear that, we need more love to the helicopters. And with the Hind coming next year (finger crossed) the Cobra could have been a good balanced Appreciate the new transparency policy though
  24. Thank you for the fix Hope we get that VOIP in DCS in near future. So all is integrated
  25. I know you guys have this on the queue, but can we get some words about the Data Cartridge on DCS? Maybe about how its expected/planned to be, and the functions that it will bring to DCS Im asking this since in the Viper its a important feature to have Thx
×
×
  • Create New...