jojyrocks

The F-15C was already in the wishlist, they kinda said it was not in the pipeline. But since RAZBAM decided to slam the F-15E and proudly say to the public, their customers who bought it, that they no longer are going to update...and now suddenly seeing the F-15C kinda gives me that sinking feeling that F-15E support is pretty much over. The F-15C is not actually going to fill the gap left by the F-15E which could do both air to air and air to ground. F-15C we are going to get is the seal clubb...I mean redforce smacking model. Not to mention, the only cold war class Red force they just had to stop considered we already have a very low redforce modules and campaigns. It is all blue force campaigns, never redforce.

Most probably a 3D Ai model.

But at least, increase the numbers on the late cold war era, like Mig 23 which is needed and Mig 27, Su-22/17 etc...these cold war planes can increase the collection. With this we can at least more playability at least in 90s and early 2000 era scenarios in prospective redforce campaigns, and these redforce campaigns are lacking. The F-35 will smash the redforce air to air, and it is only fun for those super precision style surgical strikes kinda missions. Mostly, ground pounding galore with the Middle east maps that already did have real life campaigns. Then there is very mega slow updates on the already AI 3d models, we still have GIMP/Paint Mig 23, Mig 25 and Su-30, totally awkward seeing those with present graphics. Do we have to wait like years to have those 3d models updated? I don't get what is the big excitement in seeing the J-35 Draken when it is only an AI 3d asset and not a full module... Cold war era is still lucrative.

F-35 будет использоваться так, как он используется сейчас в реальной жизни, наземные удары на Ближнем Востоке, точечные удары и т. д. Типичный сценарий, воздушное противостояние, которое практически не существует, за исключением, может быть, возможного сценария против Ирана, Ирака и сирийского парка воздушных боев МиГ-29, иранских F-14 и F-4.

Превосходство НАТО... На данный момент Красная сила готова! Похоже, мы даже не можем надеяться на Холодную войну, МиГ-27 и RAZBAM МиГ 23 уже выглядят мрачно. Как минимум, им нужно обновить 3D-модели ИИ МиГ 23 и Су-30.

If SOME balance to redforce, at least some semblance of it is not possible. I would at least like to see UPDATED Ai 3d models of the current Ai inventory of planes like Mig 23 and Su-30, the current models look totally out of place, it looks like, gimp/paint models. Hope if not any modern redforce, maybe just maybe, some cold war era, more of it, like the Mig 27, Su-7 or 22 and well a rethinking on the Mig 23 which just was canned.

Most probably a new AI model than a full module.

Certainly very exciting modules for the Blueforce, I mean, very strong blueforce package... The Redforce is pretty much doomed at this point, with just Mig 29 early version and sadly even their numbers are pretty low with no more Mig 23 for us, at least we could have had a good late cold war time to settle with some variety of choices. With F-35, F-15C and the Eurofighter, the modern Redforce time is officially cooked. An official redforce campaign is quite lacking too... Anyway, pretty sure we gotta long wait ahead The other thing we get from this video is that, Redforce is cooked. The least they could do for the redforce is at the very least, PLEASE update those AI 3D models, It is so ugly seeing AI paint gimp Mig 23, Mig 25 and even the Su-30.

I have disabled the hot plugging. Vsync off Using RTX 4070 32gb RAM Intel i5 13600K Win 10 pro, running at high performance power plan and running on SSD. So far, this issue is scene with Caucasus map and even Persian Gulf, using F-18 and even F-14 on carrier landing quick mission. This extreme stutter makes it very unplayable. However, what I so far found was that, this happens when you in in the vicinity of the carrier, not much issues with simple missions in Caucuses, like just VFR landing or just shore navigation. F-14 stutter at Caucus quick start map landing bug.trk F-18 stutter at Caucases supercarrier launch map bug.trk F-18 stutter at Caucus quick start map bug.trk dcs.log dcs.log-20250105-040601.zip

I have disabled the hot plugging. Vsync off Using RTX 4070 32gb RAM Intel i5 13600K Win 10 pro, running at high performance power plan and running on SSD. F-18 stutter at Caucus quick start map bug.trk F-18 stutter at Caucases supercarrier launch map bug.trk

At the very least, an early level Su-30 or Su-27...I suppose it is asking too much.

It would be wonderful IF they update the vapour effects for all FC3/4 jets, at the very least. Mig 29 has it so far...

Some day, I just hope they update the current GIMP/PAINT level Su-30 AI asset we have here. I know it is too much to hope for an Su-30 full fledged module.

Будут ли когда-нибудь эффекты пара в FC3? Я надеялся увидеть эти эффекты в последнем обновлении FC3. Он есть только у МиГ-29.

Will FC3 ever add vapour effects like the Mig 29 FC3 module has?

I was also hoping that they add the vapour effects to almost all FC3 planes like the FC3 Mig 29 has...it feels as though something is missing out.

I was hoping that ED would add some VAPOUR EFFECTS for the all the FC3 planes like they did with the Mig 29...

Mirage f1ee startup bug.trk Or...am I doing something wrong in the steps?

I can engine start the Mirage BE and CE just fine, but the EE version is now not starting up, the engine does not spool. BE and CE starts just fine. I tried this in the Instant missions, cold start missions.

I hope they do the F-104 model that has a gun...it did house the famed M61 Vulcan cannon first...then there is that famed engine howl.

Finally! My dream come true... Now comes the wait...2026 maybe...

I am just emphasizing that it is impossible to that in DCS Hornet. You cannot keep the nose up by modulating the stick with full flaps. It is possible with half flaps. But IRL it is seen being done by these pilots, despite NATOPS SOP, pilots seems to do it, especially in airshows and non Navy users. The emphasis is on the part of "doability"/possibility and not about following NATOPS SOP to the letter when we clearly see here, pilots doing just that, not following the NATOPS to the letter, especially non navy users of these planes, Hornet and the Tomcat. Anyway, its a softer smooth landing without smashing it in when you land in land bases, longer runway. Aerobraking is a skill in itself, to modulate the stick for that smooth braking on ample runways. Weather conditions also matter though...

I voted for F-105 and the AH-1 But I do not think there is much data on F-105 to make a module.

Flare nose up aerobrake touchdown in the F-14 is doable like the Iranians do on runway landing. For USN...only demo pilots seem to do it. Despite NATOPS saying not to...even USN pilots, especially demo pilots do it. In DCS it is possible if you land without cutting power to full idle and just modulate the throttle and pitch after rear wheels touch.

I was only quoting the Hornet coz we see Finnish pilots doing it with their Hornets and even in sometimes we do see even in the Super Hornet doing aerobrake landing by USN pilots. Despite NATOPS manuals saying otherwise, some pilots do this when landing on runways. It is also SUPER hard almost impossible to do a long flare nose up with the Hornet in DCS. But with half flaps it flaring and aerobrake is easy.