

Cab
Members-
Posts
1242 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Cab
-
Trimmed for AOA? On-speed trim at 250KIAS?
-
As has already been said above, fly AOA not airspeed. If the mission is designed properly, it will be grading you on AOA when it says you're fast.
-
Would someone who’s seeing this ballooning or excessive nose up post a track demonstrating it?
-
Here is a track of gear and flaps being lowered at 250 knots. Flaps go straight to Full. Hornet landing config 250 knots.trk
-
You balloon lowering gear and flaps at 250 kts?
-
Sales. A lot of us will buy it even without assets.
-
Was this a post-production modification, then? Did the Su-25 originally have a brake lever on the stick?
-
Looking at it again, I think you’re right
-
It’s not? What is it then? I always assumed it was an abbreviation for Sukhoi. Like “MiG” is for Mikoyan and Gurevich. Now it just needs a proper ADI.
-
FWIW I just tried a quick instant action with a clean Hornet. Gear down at 250kts followed by full flaps did not result a pitch up of any kind. It was quite stable in level flight. Update: There is a gentle nose up movement as the jet slows to on-speed, but it quickly settles back even with no trim input.
-
300 knots? Just a reminder the gear and flaps should be lowered at 250 or below.
-
That makes sense since I don't use those. Thanks
-
Interesting. Where was this originally posted?
-
I'm not sure there would be a lot of demand for the S-3 as a paid module.
-
Well, it is better than it was but still needs more work. The good news is ED has acknowledged that.
-
Can you point to the information?
-
Sorry, I probably accidentally deleted the “B” when I deleted the rest of your post.
-
Pilots I've heard interviewed, who flew both the Phantom and Tomcat, are unanimous in their opinion that the Phantom was much easier to bring aboard.
-
If you're still talking about the B model, then I wouldn't either. I tend to buy all the new aircraft just to have them, but I think I'd wait for the F-111B to be at least 50% off. The Air Force versions are a different story.
-
You can always be counted on to have colorful opinions.
-
Their solution will have to be judged on its own merits. Might be better, might not. We'll have to wait and see.
-
No it isn’t but I know there’s no convincing you of that. Thankfully, ED disagrees with you too, as they’re actively looking to change (read: improve) it. So, by all means, keep compensating for a flawed flight control model. However, I and others look forward to further improvements.
-
So what you’re say is, the current state of the F-5 is accurate and only requires a “pilot” to know how to fly it correctly?