TaxDollarsAtWork

It seems as though somethings are being lost in translation this thread does a good job at explaining it https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=254127

I'm certainly glad this has helped. There are other things you can try that might help like putting the flaps down or enabling/disabling the FCS at certain points in the recovery. I just haven't tested them enough to see if they're truly impactful in the manoeuvre.

What are ED's thoughts on Predictive Guidance laws as part of a later missile overhaul?

Where did you find the full version?

With regard to this 'Deep stall' as I don't know what else to term it. The best way to recover is by inducing as much violent up and down nose rocking, by putting the stick full roll right full & rudder right and alternating full roll left & full rudder, when you reach the highest point the the nose will go on either side. Eventually the rocking builds up and at about 60 degrees you are able to roll out of the maneuver into controlled flight. By which point the engines will also recover from their compressor stalls automatically. It is important to start the recovery process as quickly as possible as it will take time to build up again the momentum to carry the nose to that sweet spot again. I've attached a track showcasing this. Su-27 Deep Stall recovery.trk

Could you post these charts here? Are the JF17 ones included in the manual?

That's not true, I'd even be willing to take something such as the F-7B In sims Chinese Origin planes have been quite often overly neglected despite them being quite popular in the export market and proliferating like wild fire, You can't have Marianas, Malay-Indonesian or Korean map without PLAAF planes or any East Asian map for that matter

Some of it seems like ground mapping modes which would imply some kind of N001VE / VEP which we are not getting To me it sounds like a partial upgrade adding just the MFD not any new ordinance or radar modes If they could clarify that would be appreciated

One suggestion based off the stream clip, Try and use the gun funnel more often LCOS tends to be much more inaccurate unless you're dead six on him within like 20 degrees of his tail Chances are you could've gotten him earlier in the scissors Simply set it to 13m or 10m at the start

Had this weird issue where an engine burst into flames a few moments after an enemy missile hits the water I don't know what could cause it as I don't have random failures turned on track attached desync through ground.trk

I've modded them onto the J-11A before and found them to kinematically be pretty much the same the only difference was the CCM Uboats once said the PL-12 was trialed on a J-11A but it really shouldn't be implemented in game as that's virtually a prototype and not representative of the J-11A fleets capabilities I would like them to do a later version of J-11A or a Su-30MKK though, I believe they have the documentation for that Though a more realistic question would be when can we expect more AI planes in the Chinese asset pack such as J-8s J-11Bs J-15s H-6s

It doesn't let you see the J11 perspective as well? It received no warning until it went active I thought you would be able to spectate it as it's a player aswell

Is the R-27 missile update still coming this month?

Certainly if they could do it though I would be much more interested in seeing a Su-30MKK or later model of the J-11A Ideally the 30 for more added PGMs / Anti Ship missiles

Any type of Flanker PLAAF or otherwise

While granted, DCS is currently in a very weird transitional period in regards to missile modeling and radar as well. I don't think OP should scream bloody murder in this fashion, it certainly doesn't help his case Maybe inquiring about the progress of ECM implementation/Adder & Alamo performance in a slightly more erudite fashion might work, get more flies with honey than vinegar and all that jazz.

If that's the case, why not just do a Single seat SK? I'd personally would want one with better avionics first and if possible single seat (of course not possible really with things like the Su-30MKM or Su-30M2)

What will it include? Manually settable way points in flight? Higher data link contact limit? Will it have peer to peer and fighter to fighter datalink implemented? Will it be a separate screen over the monochrome TV? A two MFD set up or just the one? You guys have been a little elusive as to what exactly it will encompass more clarity on this would be nice Also happy to hear a FF J-11A & Su-30MKK might be in the cards

I'd be mighty excited for that where did they say it and can they give their response on if a Su-30MKK (or any flanker) is indeed in the cards

Q-5D or Q-5III Its a bit like a PLAAF Jaguar in a sense would certainly be the most popular

I'd like to preface this with saying that I am not the most familiar with the F/A-18 and would like to be enlightened about this behaviour which to the lay person seems awfully odd at such a dramatic angle What little mentions I've found cite altitude loss which wasn't the case in game though I do not know the loading and power settings of the planes they referred to If this is a bug what causes it? CG shift from the racks plus too little drag? Track showing the prolonged 50 AOA at 90 knots with no alt loss in some instances it climbs Nevermind High AOA spectacle.trk

Yes here is a track about the 120s not giving warnings when launched in STT server-20200706-124834.trk

Is there any talk of missiles like the R-73 & AIM-9L/M family getting aero reworks as well?

I see that the current R-73 implementation has an on the rail acquisition cone of 45 but in flight tracks as wide as 75 Correct me if I'm wrong but there are 2 versions which went into service one with an acquisition range of 45 and in flight tracking gimbals of 60 degrees And a later version which has an on the rail acquisition range of 60 and tracking range of 75 degrees (from say about the late 80s?) If this is correct wouldn't that mean the game should have 2 Archers one early and one late?

Я вижу, что в файлах дальность обзора после запуска составляет 75, но не должно быть также и с диапазоном захвата 60 в самолете и 75 в полете Поправьте меня, если я ошибаюсь, но ранний P-73 имеет диапазон обнаружения 45 градусов и поле зрения 60, в то время как в конце 1980-х один имеет диапазон измерения 60 градусов и поле зрения 75 градусов