Fisu_MAD

i refered this. About ghost objects ...

Yesterday i see this. I was between some staff i dont see. This comes from other perspective

It is a great tool. I have had to stop using it because it produces loss of FPS, so precious in DCS right now. I hope that soon I can enjoy it when they give the push to the VR.

Thx BN for the answer

Nice job bkthunder, this will be usefull for track bugs. I love the data "Age of unsolve bugs". Here you can see how frustrating is report a bug and devs or CM or RB ignore it for years. This module need tons of love to shine as what it stands for. One of the best aircraft in the entire history of aviation. It is a real shame that it is in this state for long time.

With the latest updates, visibility at airports has been substantially improved. But there are still a couple of things. Green taxi lights for airways at airfields, along with more signs and directions at airports for a better taxi would enhance the experience.

Same here: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=270495 :)

When the planes are on the parking platform at night and we have light bulbs on them, the ground lights up perfectly, but the planes don't light up. The planes are still in absolute darkness. If a friend plane passes and has the taxi lights on, you can see how the textures light up, but not with the headlights. The same happens with all the lights that exist at the airport (Red, blue, ...) Same here: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=270052 Regards

So i have the same issue, i dont know what im doing wrong. Today arrive a LED lamp and tomorrow a powered USB hub. Room has good light.

its actual, and its hard to revive this zombie post for years. I dont know if bugtracker make sense...

+1

Nice, Bignewy, we wait the better for DCS, i wish ED find these problems in the short time

Hahahaha, :thumbup: Quigon, So it isn't strange,you wanna the coca-cola composition for create your own one? Share is good in some cases, but Pikey needs all the details, need the composition, this is impossible. Happy to explain things to you

DCS is open source??

-10000 This over time is called pay to win. The model is changed and the game will be changed, since if you pay you have to have some type of benefit on which it does not pay. You are not going to do it altruistically, no matter how much you write it here. I would change from simulator to kill kill, a more expensive War Thunder. DCS has already passed version 1.2 .... it is its core, why we have not to pay for its CORE that is freeee, we have enough to pay for modules that are not cheap at all. Modules that stay in EA for years, I pay for these modules over a free CORE man. Don't give absurd ideas.

Falcón parece que estás en lo cierto https://m.facebook.com/notes/por-la-raz%C3%B3n-o-la-fuerza/misiles-bvr-aim-120-amraam/370062426487043/

mmm i think isnt normal 5000ft RMax 7 miles, head to head Su25T vs F18C, no man, 2 miles more and can use IR missiles, something is wrong here. Im not expert are you one? Because you are saying that this is correct. Time ago missiles had reached more far away.

Here a comparison SD10 vs 120C. https://youtu.be/sLX02w8gWfw This is hilarious. See specification section. Range information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PL-12#SD-10 and compare with https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-120_AMRAAM. If is modeled C5 versión have the same Range. 70–100 kilometres (43–62 mi) SD10 ~ AIM-120C-5: 105 km (56,6955 mn) In DCS im firing 120C at 5000ft to a chopper in RMAX 6 mn, how is this possible??. Hot contacts 15 mn at 25.000ft and 19 mn at 35.000ft. I think the characteristics of the missiles are far from being modeled on DCS. I am not an arms expert, but here the numbers do not deceive anyone. It can not be that the performance of the missiles have losses of 50% of their effective range.

Please fill bug section with all miss or isn't ok. Seems Harrier is finished. I understand people are tired from being ignored by RB it's the only way to raise their faults.

Rmax, wait 4 seconds more and you can use AIM9X or AIM9M. I was destroyed by SD10 launched at Angeles 5. I was at Angeles 25, and Rmax reached, 15mn??? and FOX3. RWR alert the SD10, 4 seconds and F18C destroyed. He lauched the SD at 5000 ft and have range before than me that was a 25000 ft??? The ranges for the AIM120 are shorter than before.

si :thumbup:

Yep, over 10 meters

+1000 Forget, He is a big troll.

I have smooth experience in VR with HP reverb. Things are optimised? Placebo effect?. Since 2.5.6 I have to OC my ring I7 5o 5000mhz and gpu 15%. With this is enough to reach the 2.5.5 fps. The stability is better?? Let's see. Only suffer lost of fps in Caucasus in late afternoon with cover sky and rain. This cause horrible fps numbers and VR become unplayable.