darkman222

Although I said I would not investigate. Seems like the stutters getting worse each time you visit the menu when connected to a server. Might be placebo, but it seems to help if I respawn with the keybind ( its per jet and called: Get new plane - respawn) instead of using the menu to respawn. EDIT: Forget it. Its a placebo. I spawned into a stuttery mess on the server right from the beginning. Also reverted to the previous Geforce drivers did not help. Unplugging the mouse as some people say it causes stutter did not help either. To sum it up: I really give up now.

Yeah stutters are back. I had good results using process lasso to disable E Cores and Hyperthreading for DCS but after the latest updates its just micro sutters again. Also not related to be close to other aircraft that can trigger LOD switching. Its something new now. I give up because I dont have the nerves to investigate again in it.

@Deltaalphalima1For the Force sensor TDC slew upgrade for WW F16EX Throttle your website says that youre awaiting more stock for July 2024. Did I already miss it, and its sold out again, or are you still waiting for it to be produced?

Same here. Could not identify it. Only happened in Afghanistan though. Turned the radio down completely, which works if you are flying as singleton on the map. But together with teammates its not a solution. I thought it was a multiplayer issue only. Apparently not.

Thanks for the info. While I am waiting for my order to process, the only thing that worries me comparing the VR1 to the Aero is the front heaviness for dogfighting. Checking six and the headset will fall off is my biggest concern with it. Also I purchased without MR cameras as I hope to save weight.

So what are the current recommended steps to get rid of this FC3 install. I am stuck in a loop too. I click install. It installs something with 7.9 MB. And the message of pending modules is still in game. The launcher shows me 5 available installs, that are invisible.

For LSO and Air Boss. This guy here: null

I can not get the interactive control cross in VR. The green one to control the carrier if I create an own mission with LSO slot in VR. Works fine in 2D. But no cross in VR. null

Works just fine on my DCS installation. Post a track as we dont know what you did before you started the video recording. As a quick test. Start the F16 Caucasus free flight mission. Dont touch DGFT or MSL override switch. Just press AA or AG. Works on my end.

Thanks for the clarification. So unfortunately no trolling of unware F18 or F14 players on MP servers. Commanding a turn of the supercarrier is awesome. Has a better turn rate than an F16. I wonder if the jets will fall off the deck

Possibly ordering is not open for public. I made an order reservation months ago

Currently owning the Aero. Not disappointed with it though. Ordered the Somnium VR1 anyway. The only thing that concerns me for DCS is the Somnium being front heavy, which can be an issue when dogfighting.... we will see....

I works like when you spawn in and the SAM site is not hidden for you by the mission maker or by mission setup, it will show on the HSD. Create a simple single player mission. Put a player F16 and a SAM site only on the map. The sam site will show in the jet. So when you spawn in the jet the thread ring is set for you. The threat steerpoint we currently dont have is a separate thing. But whats creating the thread symbols on the HSD for you at the moment is just DCS magic at the moment.

Thats 7 months old posts...

There is a current bug that keeps the symbology from the previous released weapon. There is an entire thread about it. But the easiest way to fix or to check if the "low" is a remainder from a CCRP drop for example: On the ICP press AG once, to go back to NAV. Then press AG again and see if "low" disappeared. If not, "low" refers in deed to the HARM sub mode and it should be considered as bug.

As far as I can remember you can start up the engine while GPS is aligning, if you want to save time by overlapping processes. I have not tried it recently if its still the case tho. But throttling up with engaged brakes will make the jet drop the nose slightly which will definitely throw off the GPS alignment.

Why shouldnt it work on W11? Works great. You can use the trial version and see if it helps. From my further investigations it seems to help on most of the intel users with stutters. Not sure about AMD.

So this is the millionth time people flew circles for Tacview and look at the STR and say, wow now I know why I could not win. I just could not sit here at STR and wait for the bandit to slide into my HUD. But STR is only a part of how good a jet is. What about drag, drag at high AOA, energy retention, thrust to weight ratio? If you bleed down your energy and regain it quicker than the bandit, that is what makes the difference at comparable STR. For the guys being around here longer. Remember the first flight model the F16 was released with? There was never something wrong with STR. But once you bled down your energy, you literally could not get it back when exceeding 3G at slow speeds at high AOA. So you were stuck at low speed or you'd have to completely unload and fly straight and level, which is not desirable in a dogfight. Once that drag was adjusted, the DCS F16 instantly became a better dogfighter. Without changing anything at the STR. What that proves is that only STR is not an indicator how good a flight model is. If something else is off, the STR can be spot on and it just means not much in terms of over all jet performance.

Why is it always that STR is investigated and questioned. Nobody seriously doing guns only dogfighting just sits at perfect rate speed and waits 1500 degrees to score a win although you start to see losing cues, to get shot down after 3 circles. It is drag and energy retention up to rate speed again that often makes a win or a lose. In the F18 you'd just bleed your airspeed, because you gain it back while you still point your nose at the bandit all the time. How is that measured and compared to real life jet performance?

Where is the performance data from the 9,5 G regime when pulling the paddle coming from?

You overlooked one major point. We might have an EULA stating what you say. But on the other hand nobody forces the users to stay with DCS and play DCS. You could also use products from competitors. And thats the other major point. There isnt a serious alternative. So its in EDs hands and in EDs responsibilty how good they want to maintain their modules, also during EA. And this is why people feel so disappointed with bugged modules. Whatever the EULA says, losing trust in ED in the long run will be visible in sales, I agree. Do you want to know things look like with competition, even while both are for free? DCS Voice Chat vs SRS. If you are not forced to use a bugged product, and have an alternative, people just dont use it, including me, although I would love to.

I dont want to understand how ED operates and how they make money. Thats their business. If you guys here are smarter, and want to help ED, apply to the respective position at ED. I just want to emphasize from a customer point of view, and what this thread is about: If I purchase a product even one that is labelled as "early access" and this product has certain features at the time I purchase, even if it is worked on, I expect the features to go on working. And not that it gets broken and stays broken for a year or longer.

I request the location. i would travel to this danish mall just to have a seat and check how the button resistance feels, the moveable range of the stick is etc

If someone gets one, please let us know how the weight distribution is. Also in terms of how it fits on the face, or if it falls off if you have to do a quick check six glance

As he says. Its not a Mig29 obviously Dont we have an unclassified text passage in the F16 Lockheed manual saying "just dont land on the field"? Not really sure how to prove obvious things to ED without a document saying so. Even if it said so, I have the feeling that ED would only implement it if there was a speed mentioned with that. The reason for not having data on that is, that no one in real life would test this on purpose to gather data for that. Apart from that the DCS F16 gear seems to be pretty indestructible. It comes out and goes back in at Mach 1.