Shimmergloom667

I dropped four GBU-31 today with elevation set in feet and all hit their mark (Caucasus)

Adding to this, only on NTTR - Mission set to "Client", game freezes after turning on the MPCD, regardless of loadout.

This is a month old and I have not seen any information on this, so: has anyone managed to remove the playback limitation settings for tacview on the dedicated server by now? Thanks!

It's only a few posts back: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3938461#post3938461

The necessary alignment of the INS (Inertial Navigation System) to the actual, physical location your plane is located at. The system in the Hornet so far has been a placeholder and the team is starting to implement the correct procedure now, so that's why we are seeing changes.

Given that the F-14s burner is invisible right now I guess that's really temporary ^^

Them 2.5.5 trees really do look a lot better!

This. (Some) Hornet bugfixes, the general VR improvements and fixes for the 3rd party modules are (were) still scheduled for today.

Literally unplayable

Also we will still see bugfixes this week, as per the same thread https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3935071&postcount=42

No, he's pretty on spot with his reasoning.

Easy: the current state of the F-18 is *fine*. It received constant updates every few weeks since it's release, it's absolutely playable and usable and we are *now* entering more complex systems which take a bit more time. There is literally nothing to whine about. That's why I preordered the F-16 the minute it went online for pre-purchase: because I think ED is doing a pretty damn good job and I want to express my feelings by voting with my wallet.

And here we have a prime example, again.

This so much. The sense of entitlement of part of the player base is simply unbelievable.

Ah so I understood that right! Brilliant, thanks so much, Wags! :)

NineLine or Wags: are we getting a patch on the 5th without JSOW and a small one on the 12th adding them? While I think the F-18 development is progressing fine we really need that drag model fix for the F-14 that was planned to come in this patch back in may. :)

Because others might own the module you don't own, so understandably the company managing all them modules wants to ship a patch that is tested as good as possible against *all* that stuff.

Except for the fact that ATFLIR is more complicated to implement and depending on core DCS work being done (which is why they went for LITENING as a stop-gap), that's exactly what we are getting. Dont't forget last year's poll, which directly influenced what the team is working on *right now*. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=219023

That is true. 2.5.5 has some bigger VR changes incoming, they need to be sure every module, includign 3rd party, works and given the nature of software development there simply has been unforeseen problems and delays. Nothing more, nothing less.

It's almost as if software development is no exact science and unforeseen problems can arise, that force delays. Crazy, I know.

Let's not start with semantics now, shall we? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States#20th-century_wars

Mainly Jester, but only rarely in MP, maybe two times a week: still - none so far.

At this point, my money and me will already be two days apart :D

This really seems to be a weird problem, I never, ever had a single crash using PAL/STT in both SP and MP.

How 'bout the F-14B Bugs & Problems Forum? https://forums.eagle.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=628 And seriously, if you don't want a probation or ban: read forums rule 1.16 and remove that NATOPS (the rule says "not newer than 1980, and one can argue about the F-14 documents, since it is a) still in use with the IRIAF and b) the late models are certainly newer)