eatthis

when i use cockpit lights with the index, the lights only appear in 1 eye, unpleasent to see

are they the same setting just on a different scale?

hows that done now? synchronization has been a thing in electronics forever

il be getting a 5900x when therye out, im building an entire system from the ground up and selling my existing setup iv got 32gb of viper 4400mhz sat in boxes ready to go

so they have to manually assign tasks to seperate cores? if somebody could automate that then surely it would be a HUGE breakthrough performance wise??

whats the problem when it comes to multicore cpus? why dont games spread workloads around the cores?

ive used a warbird with 100mm extension for months. no problems at all with it. the main chassis appears to a milled from a single block of ali. VERY robust mechanically. the mongoose base gives a bit more adjustability really but thats about all ive noticed. both are top draw mechanically

switch your tcs on, its brilliant for vizid

i cant comment on vkb because ive never used 1. as for virpil i have 2 warbird bases and a mongoose cm2 base. mechanically theyre both fantastic, VERY well built and great to use, they do however have 1 achilles heal and thats the cable that runs from the stick to the main pcb in the base. all 3 of mine have gone, their customer service is good though and theyve sent me new cables every time without issue. compared to the warthog base theyre amazing and i highly recommend them

wings are good for 13g iirc

no garauntee of that overclocked or in dcs, im going for that to upgrade from a 7700k though

im no fan boi,m over the years iv had 386, 486, cyrix (yes really haha) athlon, 920 (i think), 3770k at 4.8 and atm i have a 7700k at 5ghz. im doing a build from the ground up now and ive gone for x570 and 5900x, 32gb 4400mhz ram, undecided on gfx card yet, im tentatively awaiting the 20gb 3080. see what thats like

i dontr know what im doing with teh calcs. my current and next pc will have cpu and gpu watercooled so alot of the heat is going out of the case theres a block you can get to watercool the ram. are they worth it?

any chance we could have the crew hang 1 arm out of the pit when taxiing with wings swept and canopy open?? im serious btw lol

What is it?

why is that? iv bought 4 x8gb 4400 cl 19 kits for my new build, you reckon i should aim get it running 3800 at cl16?. ps il probably end up with a decent x570 mobo IF the new amd cpus beat intels for dcs

i tested it loaded in 1k foot increments from 30-40k at mach 0.72. 35k was the sweetspot for fuel usage in them test conditions ps with no stores and little fuel you can EASILY cruiser at 1500pph per motor at 35k

i havnt even decided what im getting yet, let alone attempted to buy 1 :lol:

not sure why, thats the cruise altitude so surely thats the best fuel/speed ratio?? itl use less fuel higher because theres less air (so less fuel needed for the same a/f ratio) but the power will drop off for the same reason

you can get rid of pylons in rearm menu, also i think best altitude for mx speed is 35k. not 100% on that 1 though

am i right in thinking 1080 works in dcs vr sli?

2 weeks

no, its literally the purpose software to work efficiently on existing hardware! a balanced system is great but if a piece of software massively overloads a part of the hardware (eg cpu cores) whilst underutilizing others then theres no amount of hardware balancing you can do to make up for that inneficiency, you can get part way with brute force but even the best hardware out there can only do so much.

i know its not officially supported anymore (although they still have the bridge!) but ive seen benchmarks in non dcs games and it still works there

im building a proper system from the ground up, going nearly all in (probably not as far as a 3090 though) cpu and gpu will be watercooled and overclocked. waiting for this gen stuff to be out, its looking like the new ryzen might beat the 10900k atm. gfx card is up in the air atm maybe thinking 20gb 3080 or navi. anybody compared 3080 vs 3090 for dcs vr yet?