Jump to content

=52d= Skip

Members
  • Posts

    221
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by =52d= Skip

  1. And what exactly would you say is it that is still unresolved?
  2. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3308802/ Same Author has more PAF Liveries.
  3. =52d= Skip

    F-15E?

    Saved me alot of typing, so Thank you! for this ;)
  4. Some Class A flying there! Music I had to turn off tho :)
  5. In the current release (Open Beta V. 2.5.6.50321) the Harrier is still missing the ToT functionality. But is it really needed? A Time on Target Exercise.
  6. Some 47 Mins in, Bookmarks in the Description. Low, fast and steady. Be generous. If your bombs fall long, aim short, if they fall short, aim long.
  7. The negative G´s are not the cause, but they amplify your "Problem". You are very much out of trim and this contributes as well. I tried to reproduce what you are seeing and here is what I think is happening: - At 0.09 things look ok; you are in an upward motiona gainst a Mountain with a valid solution - At 0.11 you somehow created a TGT designation against the slope and ofc your solution is immediately invalid because your target is right where the FPM is. Pushing the nose down makes it worse in this case. - At 0.32 you undesignate the TGT and voila´ CCIP pipper is back where it needs to be. Video ends. I´d say CCIP tracking works well even agains a slope (to some degree). At one point the system can not cope anymore tho and quits, which is expected. So I would suggest you check your bindings to make sure you´re not accidently designating when you don´t want to. If you have access to the TAC-000 you can read up on how it is calculating the CCIP impact point.
  8. Never saw this erratic behavior. The whole idea behind the SE was that you can fly low, and thus undetected, and still could hit your target without fragging yourself. So yes, fast (450-500kts) and low (200-500ft) is the way to go - or a shallow dive. As you can see in my example this works well. Target was an SA-6, with an SA-15 and some Shilkas as close in Defense. Not sure if I understand your last question.
  9. Have a look here: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=266835&page=4
  10. Can a Mod move this to the Wishlist section please? /s
  11. The Spanish Targeting Pod on a US Hornet approach? Totally pure and untainted.
  12. You would think that in a Sub-Section called "Wishlist" someone would be able to express his wishes whatever they may be without being harassed by the bearers of the pure? Noone but the Developer has to make a decission on what will or will not be included. And yes, DCS is full of the so called "Frankenplanes".
  13. If the sources are open then no harm can be in naming them, right? Maybe even a link?
  14. What strikes me most is the shockingly low number of participants.
  15. Not sure about your TacView problem, but for you to show up in your recordings you need to tick "Resume on load" in your advanced Server settings.
  16. Nellis HI-ILS Recovery, RWY 21L April 2020, DCS World Open Beta V. 2.5.6.45317
  17. If you just got the JF-17, why not concentrate on this one for now? By the time you learned all there is to know both, the F-16 and the F-18, will be more complete and for sure there will be other sales to come.
  18. Excellent work! Thanks for sharing.
  19. The Dawn Raider Mission has 2 Tankers in it, both having TCN Channel 1 assigned. This might cause the problems. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=260839
  20. At what speed would that happen?
  21. Looking at the Mission there are two possible things that can cause this: - The Mission has two Tankers and both have TACAN Channel 1 assigned - Both Tankers did show a blank "Unit" field Changing the TACAN from Shell to 11 and adding the correct Unit name I was able to have them show up on the HSI.
  22. There was a thread already, might be a couple pages back by now.
×
×
  • Create New...