TotenDead

Really? How can we switch off F-16/18 datalink and decrease their radar ranges?

В новостях указана акция на ГС3, в чем прикол? Сейчас же скидки на ВСЮ продукцию ED

Russian law doesn't prohibit the use hakenkreuz if it isn't used for propaganda

Ну если так, то ладно, хотя сайт стоило бы обновить, дабы не вводить людей в заблуждение

Да. Так балансно же, понимаешь?)) Хорнеты с Ф-16 против Су-25 и 25Т в качестве ударников

Ф-16 все же является противником 29 Ну смотри, 3 истребительные жизни + 4 штурмовые (т.е все еще можно таскать Аим-9). Как-то так)

Там красные как, хоть иногда побеждают или 7 жизней на хорнете и 4 на Ф-16 решают? Почитал чутка, дискорде синих вроде все устраивает)

Понял, спасибо за разъяснения)

Т.е его все время нужно держать по курсу на руках? По курсу триммер не работает, на сколько я понимаю, а без АП вертолет заметно крутит.

People mainly fly F-16s, F-15s, hornets, harriers, Su-27s and MiG-29s, not F-5s or MiG-21s. That's, of course, if they have a choice

Welp, unfortunately that might be realistic for single player at best

Подскажите, после посадки с включенным автопилотом по курсу временами после взлета вертолет начинает крутить вокруг своей оси аналогично вращению при вихревом кольце рулевого винта. Проблема решается пересаживанием на место стрелка, после чего умный ИИ исправляет мои мудрые потуги управления и дальше лететь можно нормально. Вопрос - как выйти из такого состояния вращения и как в него не попадать в принципе

Yeah, I see that xd

Yeah, blurb. That's what we usually hear from Chief Operational Officer

i'm sorry, did I say official announcement? Check Kate Perederko messages in Discord

That's an official plan, not remote posibility

> Pleeeeez, we need a cold war F-16, block 50 is bad for 80s scenarios A few days later > ... so, this F-16 block 49.99 would fit DCS well

At least 4, including Syria. Their MiG-29s carry both r-77s and Talisman ECM pods

But Fw-190 isn't competetive against the Hornet either...

Well, that was painful. Interestingly enough, you're not the only one who calls these missiles in such a wierd way. IT'S like calling Aim-120C smt like Cam-120i R-27ER or R-27ET. R-27ER1 is a worsened export version of R-27ER, same with ET1. R-77-1 is a missile for RuAF, export version is called RVV-SD.

Despite the fact that some think that MiG-29 would be incompetetive and thus not popular, the popularity of this thread already prooves that there is a decent interest in the plane

And chances of encountering F/A-18C lot 20 were even smaller xd Really? Because everyone who did at least a little research knows that the problem was in equipment, which was in poor state or was abscent and poor commanders, thanks to 90s. All that had nothing to do with "Soviet thinking"

In the 80s F-16 had no datalink, as well as F-15 and F-18 IIRC. So nope, not really. (AIM-7>R-27R) Well, eh, hell no. I mean, Aim-7MH might be better against a slow bomber, but not a fighter. Furthermore, MiG-29 was designed to have the same DL as Su-27, but by the time USSR collapsed none were equipped with it. Anyway, you can find a switch TAKT on top of the screen in MiGs cockpit, funnily enough, according to the cockpit the DL should be switched on.

MiG-29 is capable of showing which target flies faster and which slower. But not in DCS. There also was MiG-25, Tu-128, yak-28 and other planes with pretty descent range Bullscheiss, sorry. Pilots ejected by themselves, ground commands were recomendations at best as only pilot decided wether to eject or not. Yea, you can say that CGI could order to eject, but final decision was always taken by the pilot. In fact, on many occasions pilots didn't obey "orders" as they wanted to save the plane