TotenDead

Sounds usa-ish. I suppose you don't have proofs, only your imagination

Why not C?

Guys, Just think a little. So you want an iconic phantom or the most capable you can get? Because if the latter then you might probably prefer F-16/18, they are even more capable

А ведь я только-только написал про 21бис, и вот тебе на

According to War Thunder - yes, pretty much

Typical F-4 fanbase: - We want an F-4, it's such an iconic plane! We could make vietnam era battles even more realistic as there were so many phantoms in Vietnam! - Okay, so which version do you want? - Ze yone from lait eiteez

ДКС про Х-66 на МиГ-21бис?

А если смотреть снизу вверх?

Это как так? Научатся неправильному

Nope, not necessarily MiG-29 has EO You want to say that our F-16 doesn't lock the target instantly? Eh? Dude, do you read what i write? Oh gosh, okay, whatever

But Aim-9 is enough...

Without notching? How? I wouldn't say F-16s radar interface is even near as good as the MiGs' In NEZ? I'm sorry, but if your F-16's cold, it's already probably dead. MiG-29 has 2 R-27s and 4 R-73s, so going cold would make you killed He-he, 8 miles? At 30k feet, mach 1.5? And what about R-27 NEZ against hot? I don't really need that, thanks. An hour or so ago was playing on blueflag 80s' run into a pair of F-16s in a MiG, made one defensive and that gave me more then enough time to shoot down his buddy in WVR with R-27. Shame it was too dark for the gun fight, so one of the F-16s managed to return home as i noobishly missed a few gun opportunities

It's just US was wrong in terms of F-16s' weaponry from the start. Upgrade to AIM-7 IIRC was problematic due to the amount of cables needed (compared to the aim-120 upgrade) and, as AIM-120 was not that far away from entering service, in a way irrational. You do know that that makes your plane way more vulnerable compared to notching? R-27 could be launched in no escape and MiG can crank as well in order to avoid getting into your weapon employment zone as long as possible Well, okay Yeah, but MiG wouldn't need to break the lock Welp, not sure about that, anyway, MiG wouldn't need to accelerate at all as it won't need to bleed the speed as much as F-16 would Ehm, yes, okay, didn't get how would it help F-16

Dude, Mig launches 1st 27, you turn to evade, then he launches the 2nd one and you need to evade again. IF you manage to, then you'll be in range of R-73s and will have to find and lock MiG-29 while being targeted. F-16A is a weaker aircraft overall, though it's cute to see when people try to make it look competitive

But why did it need those Aim-7s when Aim-9s are more than enough?XD

So you don't need SARH missiles? Even though 27 and 29s not only have R-27R/T, but R-73s which are way more capable than aim-9s? Welp, good for you

F-15 lacks FBW and still flies OK

IMO adding F-16s without Aim-7s would make them unplayable in DCS, they would get obliterated by any plane with medium range missiles. I think that the perfect solution for an early F-16 would be a non-amraam, but aim-7 capable variant

Let's pray for La-7 by OctopusG

Нет, это же ПАРГСН

Как-то LDFM мне больше заходит - все динамичнее, да и вид на море у обеих сторон всегда - красиво)). Однако, увы, народу там нет. На этом же сервере, как уже было написано, адовейшие расстояния, совершенно ни к чему такие не нужны. И пустые счета у большинства не из-за любви к полетам - тупо не найти никого. Собственно, для меня проблемы с обнаружением противника и крайне затянутые вылеты убивают все желание возвращаться на сервер

Не видно тут как-то про внешнее целеуказание ничего. Только про то, что РЛПК и ОЛС в одних ситуациях дополняют друг друга, в других один из этих двух сенсоров является ведущим, а второй - в ведомым

Думаю эта книжка у разрабов есть) А вот обратить из внимание на какой-то конкретный абзац/раздел было бы здорово. Посему и пишу про скрин.

Ты б скрин с документа кинул что ли

Okay then. Any non-amraam teen would be great to be added IMO as it restricts you to a completely different gameplay.