Response To EvilBivol's Post

[Chappie]

Documentation is wonderful but I would prefer present documentation and no training missions (by now I have no need for them anyway) in exchange for the Mi-8 bombing gunsight, infantry showing up in my copter, sling load operations, more weapon options, more paint schemes, and more features period.

 

For the UH-1, I would prefer to see infantry in my chopper, more weapon options, ability to replace wounded gunner, more accurate gunning by AI, more paint schemes, complete sling loading, and more features period.

 

The documentation I have for the UH-1 is fine. I expect a focus more on completing your pema-beta helicopters (btw Leatherneck is updating their product...) and a focus on delivering me more of what I want. It matters not to me the difficulty because I already paid for your products not a beta but as complete. Show that good-faith I placed in you by purchasing your product and deliver.

 

While you are at it, I would appreciate a focus on delivering an Mi-24 Hind which I would be happy to even help back (fund) before betaing any other project.

Edited November 19, 2014 by Chappie

[Silver_Dragon]

- Infantry in the choppers, ED feature (part of skeleton animations / infantry improvements / CA plausible improvement) no exclusive of BSK.

- Mi-8 Bomb sight, can required to ED improve some type of feature before BST can improve them.

- More weapons options (mines?, firebombs?) ED feature, no excursive of BST.

- Ability to replace wonder gunner Arma style? ED feature (no planned), no BST exclusive.

- Sling load operations (part of ED / Belsimtek common features)

[QuiGon]

I want to add the implementation of engine temp for the Huey to the list. That is IMHO the most needed feature for the Huey!

[Flagrum]

I am confused. What is this thread about? To which posting of EB are your refering to, OP?

[cichlidfan]

I am guessing, this.

 

Alright, the manual working doc is on its way for review and formatting. There are still some bits of translation left, but no more than a day's worth. It does however still need a thorough editing pass at the moment not only for general language, but consistency in terminology and naming conventions. Shouldn't be more than a few days.

 

With this part...

 

...and a focus on delivering me more of what I want.

 

...being why it ended up in the wish list before it got moved again and then back to the wish list.

Edited November 19, 2014 by cichlidfan

[iFoxRomeo]

I want to add the implementation of engine temp for the Huey to the list. That is IMHO the most needed feature for the Huey!

Unfortunately engine temp is only the tip of the iceberg...

 

 

Fox

[Aginor]

That's right, at the moment you can fly it pretty recklessly, without any consequences.

EDIT: referring to the overheating thing

[Rongor]

Multicrew-Cockpit for Multiplayer please!

[hannibal]

Multicrew-Cockpit for Multiplayer please!

 

+1

 

i think the world of multiplayer will get extremely exciting with upcoming tandem seat helicopters attack helicopters (i.e. cobra, hind) doorgunners for uh1 & mi8 (i hope belsimtek will make dedicated axis assignments for the minigun/doorguns that would be separate from the camera view assignments) and of course if there is a multicrew WW aircraft (i.e. blemhiem, PE-2)

 

when i was new to flight sim, i was blown away be the original il2/trackir videos when a copilot gunner would blast at enemies while his pilot manuevers him to position.

 

BUT TO DO THIS IN VR would be beyond AMAZING!

 

i wish this will be true, and i can not stress enough separating the weapon from the camera view, super immersion killer to have a gun stuck on your face, i want to be able to look at my six while aiming the the door gun to fire port side or forward...

[Ninjaofdoom]

I expect a focus...on delivering me more of what I want.

 

 

I stopped caring about this post after I got to this. How old are you?

 

As a 15 year testing vet, things do not happen overnight. They'll be addressed in due time.

[Darkwolf]

I'm warming the popcorn, waiting for a mod to jump in. :P

 

I am not completely happy with BST too, but I don't understand this thread either.

[NineLine]

* patiently awaits sithspawn to tell you, you are "wrong" ( in whatever way he decides to word it)*.

 

BST lost me as a customer a long time ago.

 

Why would I tell him he is wrong? This is in the wishlist section, looks like a bunch of wishes... now if you will excuse me I have to run off to the Mall and tell the kids getting off Santa's knee that they cant have what they wanted... :doh:

[outlawal2]

[Chappie]

I stopped caring about this post after I got to this. How old are you?

 

As a 15 year testing vet, things do not happen overnight. They'll be addressed in due time.

 

What is due time to you? A year? Five years? Ten or how about twenty? How old am I? How intelligent are you? Your attitude exemplifies the reason not only I but others are getting fed up. Testing? I am software developer and there is no such thing as a permanent beta program for anything. The speed of other projects coming out of beta just proves my point.

[Chappie]

* patiently awaits sithspawn to tell you, you are "wrong" ( in whatever way he decides to word it)*.

 

BST lost me as a customer a long time ago.

 

They have already lost me as a customer ... period. I know the color of this room's walls and have been there before.

[NineLine]

there is no such thing as a permanent beta program for anything

 

Correct, not here either.

[NineLine]

They have already lost me as a customer ... period. I know the color of this room's walls and have been there before.

 

Well then that nullifies this thread doesnt it, I mean non-customers dont have wishes or suggestions. So I will just close this thread.