Sierra99 Posted April 24, 2016 Posted April 24, 2016 Really? We still gonna be flying fuel around with helicopters? A FARP in the middle of nowhere STILL has an unlimited supply of fuel...but a main operating base with roads and a runway can go empty? Does that make sense to anyone? Just asking. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Primary Computer ASUS Z390-P, i7-9700K CPU @ 5.0Ghz, 32GB Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 @ 3200Mhz, ZOTAC GeForce 1070 Ti AMP Extreme, Samsung 970 EVO M.2 NVMe drives (1Tb & 500 Gb), Windows 10 Professional, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS, Thrustmaster Warthog Stick, Thrustmaster Cougar Throttle, Cougar MFDs x3, Saitek Combat Rudder Pedals and TrackIR 5. -={TAC}=-DCS Server Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3, i7-3770K CPU @ 3.90GHz, 32GB G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 @ 1600Mhz, ZOTAC GeForce® GTX 970.
M460 Posted April 24, 2016 Posted April 24, 2016 Really? We still gonna be flying fuel around with helicopters? A FARP in the middle of nowhere STILL has an unlimited supply of fuel...but a main operating base with roads and a runway can go empty? Does that make sense to anyone? Just asking. Do you even Chopper Bra_? Just asking. 1 #I've been dreaming about an unlicensed version of the MIG-31... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
QuiGon Posted April 24, 2016 Posted April 24, 2016 - No Air to Air weapon limitations As someone who doesn't play FC3 I highly disapprove. Rest sounds great. Can't wait! Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
*Rage* Posted April 24, 2016 Posted April 24, 2016 As someone who doesn't play FC3 I highly disapprove. Rest sounds great. Can't wait! Why? What would you suggest? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22
BadHabit Posted April 24, 2016 Posted April 24, 2016 I have no problem with no limitations. So I can nuke now? ;) I would suggest an economy system on expensive weapons like aim120 so we avoid spam would be great and will add more realism if not implemented alrdy Mig-21 Headbutter "These are not the bugs you are looking for..":pilotfly: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] My YouTube channel SPECS -AMD FX8370 8 Core Processor 4.2 ghz -GIGABYTE 970A-UD3P -GTX 1050 TI Windforce 4g -16 GB RAM -Saitek X 52 -FaceNOIRtrack - 3 point clip Red Led
M460 Posted April 24, 2016 Posted April 24, 2016 I would really like to have more air defense options for deployment. maybe add strella or tunguska types to start testing. #I've been dreaming about an unlicensed version of the MIG-31... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
ApoNOOB Posted April 24, 2016 Posted April 24, 2016 (edited) Do you even Chopper Bra_? Just asking. I do and I agree with him. Will choppers that spawn/take off from airbases also use up fuel? Also I like the idea of MiG21 using up less fuel than bigger planes, introduces more incentive to use them. Edited April 24, 2016 by ApoNOOB
Shively Posted April 24, 2016 Posted April 24, 2016 I'd like to second complaints about the relaxation of weapons limitations for air-to-air engagement, but in a rather selfish manner, as I frankly don't want to be eating AIM-120 for breakfast, lunch, and dinner for the next week or so. That said, if there's Sukhois forcefeeding the enemy a load of R-27ET/ER, I think everything should come out about even. We'll have to see how it plays out in testing and during the event if it's not changed, may turn out to be ultimately a negligible difference.
ED Translators Foka1 Posted April 25, 2016 ED Translators Posted April 25, 2016 It was not changed. At the moment it will stay as it is. "At the moment" - you mean for whole round 6? It doesn't make sense. M2K and MiG-21 has less fuel consumption, less armament stores, less everything compared to su-27 or F-15. We will have a bunch of guys complaining about people taking MiG-21 and spending "their" fuel on it... Not to mention that L-39 probably will eat same amount of fuel that big fighters aswell? Even with reconaissance ability it will not balance it, those bombers will be hit easily, especially with SPAMRAAM... AKA LazzySeal
QuiGon Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 Why? What would you suggest? I prefer the 80s setting that has been used in the last couple of BlueFlags. That means no active radar missiles, just semi-actives like the Sparrow. Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
simo1000rr Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 I prefer the 80s setting that has been used in the last couple of BlueFlags. That means no active radar missiles, just semi-actives like the Sparrow. Great , You are probably one of those who fly SU-27 constantly and you want the opponent just to suit your desired wish . you easily say " Oh i think they shouldn't have active missile " and why would that be . just because you fly a plane that doesn't have it so we can't have active missile?? . A simulation shouldn't go by what you prefer rather than what it represents . and the simulation represents reality level to an extent and if in real life active missile is there so it should be in the sim as well. 1
Sierra99 Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 I would really like to have more air defense options for deployment. maybe add strella or tunguska types to start testing. What do you plan to carry them with? At 27,000Lbs Strellas are about 18,000lbs heavier than the MAX takeoff weight of a Huey... How about we carry things that are realistic like MANPAD teams. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Primary Computer ASUS Z390-P, i7-9700K CPU @ 5.0Ghz, 32GB Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 @ 3200Mhz, ZOTAC GeForce 1070 Ti AMP Extreme, Samsung 970 EVO M.2 NVMe drives (1Tb & 500 Gb), Windows 10 Professional, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS, Thrustmaster Warthog Stick, Thrustmaster Cougar Throttle, Cougar MFDs x3, Saitek Combat Rudder Pedals and TrackIR 5. -={TAC}=-DCS Server Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3, i7-3770K CPU @ 3.90GHz, 32GB G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 @ 1600Mhz, ZOTAC GeForce® GTX 970.
QuiGon Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 Great , You are probably one of those who fly SU-27 constantly and you want the opponent just to suit your desired wish . you easily say " Oh i think they shouldn't have active missile " and why would that be . just because you fly a plane that doesn't have it so we can't have active missile?? . A simulation shouldn't go by what you prefer rather than what it represents . and the simulation represents reality level to an extent and if in real life active missile is there so it should be in the sim as well. As I have stated on the previous page I'm not flying any of the FC3 aircraft. That leaves me to the MiG-21 and the Mirage 2000 regarding fighters and they are inferior to all FC3 fighters and their simplistic avionic simulation, even with restricted weapons. Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
Sierra99 Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 Will R-77s modded onto the SU-27 be allowed, then, to help balance AMRAAM usage? Will it be AIM-120B or C? Can Su-27s carry R-77s in real life? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Primary Computer ASUS Z390-P, i7-9700K CPU @ 5.0Ghz, 32GB Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 @ 3200Mhz, ZOTAC GeForce 1070 Ti AMP Extreme, Samsung 970 EVO M.2 NVMe drives (1Tb & 500 Gb), Windows 10 Professional, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS, Thrustmaster Warthog Stick, Thrustmaster Cougar Throttle, Cougar MFDs x3, Saitek Combat Rudder Pedals and TrackIR 5. -={TAC}=-DCS Server Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3, i7-3770K CPU @ 3.90GHz, 32GB G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 @ 1600Mhz, ZOTAC GeForce® GTX 970.
*Rage* Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 Great , You are probably one of those who fly SU-27 constantly and you want the opponent just to suit your desired wish . you easily say " Oh i think they shouldn't have active missile " and why would that be . just because you fly a plane that doesn't have it so we can't have active missile?? . A simulation shouldn't go by what you prefer rather than what it represents . and the simulation represents reality level to an extent and if in real life active missile is there so it should be in the sim as well. He's a bluefor pilot. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22
OperatorJack Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 Can Su-27s carry R-77s in real life? The Sukhoi is listed as one of the platforms cleared to use the R-77 IRL to be fair /да бойз/ [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
HiJack Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 (edited) NO! This round will have all the active missiles! End of discussion! :D Edited April 25, 2016 by HiJack
D4n Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 PLEASE please Tu-160 instead of Tu-22 ! 160 is a beast! What about 2x AWACS per team? And yea, PLEASE, Tunguska, Tor, Osa 1st person SAM!! :) DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013 DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.) Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 4060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence
OperatorJack Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 I think it would be nice if we're going to go full on with the weapons, to at least give RED all their SAM options /да бойз/ [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
BodyOrgan Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 What do you plan to carry them with? At 27,000Lbs Strellas are about 18,000lbs heavier than the MAX takeoff weight of a Huey... How about we carry things that are realistic like MANPAD teams. Have you even flown a chopper in Blue Flag? Do you honestly think they can transport the amount of fuel required to even load a single plane let alone an entire fleet of planes? What about the KUB system they currently deploy? How about the EWR? I'm all for realism, but removing those duties from the chopper pilots without replacing them with AI controlled deployment teams will cripple your Blue Flag experience.
BodyOrgan Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 Great , You are probably one of those who fly SU-27 constantly and you want the opponent just to suit your desired wish . you easily say " Oh i think they shouldn't have active missile " and why would that be . just because you fly a plane that doesn't have it so we can't have active missile?? . A simulation shouldn't go by what you prefer rather than what it represents . and the simulation represents reality level to an extent and if in real life active missile is there so it should be in the sim as well. I can't even.
ED Translators Foka1 Posted April 25, 2016 ED Translators Posted April 25, 2016 Hmm web-based map shows that server online, but I can't connect even via straight IP. What version is currently on server? CiriBob maybe you can add DCS version info to the web based map or desktop app? AKA LazzySeal
ED Translators Foka1 Posted April 25, 2016 ED Translators Posted April 25, 2016 Currently openBeta and stable version are same. So this is not the issue... AKA LazzySeal
xcom Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 To everyone discussing ammunition for the next "round" - We are working on creating different variants of Blue Flag dynamic campaign, each variant will have different setups, you will probably find yourself relating to a specific setup. So hang in there, if this round is less your cup of tea, the next one probably will be! Hmm web-based map shows that server online, but I can't connect even via straight IP. What version is currently on server? CiriBob maybe you can add DCS version info to the web based map or desktop app? Web based map is maintained by the awesome Crash. But I believe the issue you have is probably due to initial loading of the server, for the first 60 seconds, the server is not available to join, any attempts are rejected. You can find the run time of the mission in the server list. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] BuddySpike Website | Live Map & Statistics BuddySpike Twitch Channel Buddyspike Discord Buddyspike Facebook
Darkwolf Posted April 25, 2016 Posted April 25, 2016 I prefer 80s setup (please, make a real one without modern air/ground stuff as well). But... They are people that prefer modern era, so it's fine that they also have their blueflag. :) I do agree with others - It may be too short to arrange that before the launch, but please consider fuel consumption per plane type. (with their tanks). If it can ease the work, all data gathering stuff for this or other script, i can give time. Also, I hope that fuel won't be a crucial point like previous blueflag. It has been painfull for heli drivers, I prefer just no fuel system at all, its really boring, but more important CSAR work. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] PC simulator news site. Also....Join the largest DCS community on Facebook :pilotfly:
Recommended Posts