"Buddy Spike" - DCS World Online Events

[xcom]

broadcast including the radio -

first from F-15 point of view, then from GCI, after a while I also show the radios so scroll to the last 30 minutes if you want to see the GCI working with the radios on the overlay.

[D4n]

Why did you delete the output values etc (all that technical stuff) from the chart??? I thought it is important for ranges etc??

 

Also not that stacked atm, nearly balanced sides nice!

Edited July 18, 2016 by DanielNL

[D4n]

Also please bring back R-77 until Matra 530 vs. chaff is fixed (currently chaff completely useless, I already reported it).

[Sweep]

Also please bring back R-77 until Matra 530 vs. chaff is fixed (currently chaff completely useless, I already reported it).

 

So you get killed once and its a bug?

 

:megalol:

[RAZBAM_ELMO]

Also please bring back R-77 until Matra 530 vs. chaff is fixed (currently chaff completely useless, I already reported it).

How about notch and no

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

[D4n]

Sry don't know the word "notch" what I mean? Am German.

 

Sweep don't you understand that when there is chaff between a radar missile and the target, and when the target is moving straight away from the missile in a straight line, the missile seeker CAN'T see through there chaff (if huge amount) and WILL detonate on contact/close proximity to the chaff (depending on fuze) ? Glad I could teach u sth. and that u learned sth. :)

[T_A]

Also please bring back R-77 until Matra 530 vs. chaff is fixed (currently chaff completely useless, I already reported it).

 

lol so this is the new thing the kids are complaining these days?

 

if you managed to get hit by a 530 even without releasing chaff than the mirage had a lucky day , currently its very unreliable and many of us mirage pilots choose to go 4xMagic II

[AussieGhost789]

Sry don't know the word "notch" what I mean? Am German.

 

Sweep don't you understand that when there is chaff between a radar missile and the target, and when the target is moving straight away from the missile in a straight line, the missile seeker CAN'T see through there chaff (if huge amount) and WILL detonate on contact/close proximity to the chaff (depending on fuze) ? Glad I could teach u sth. and that u learned sth. :)

 

Pretty sure chaff just creates a chance to miss in DCS. It doesn't function as you would expect it to in the real world.

[LuSi_6]

I dodged 2 Matras and killed a Mirage with a R-27R yesterday evening. works as it should

[StandingCow]

Really liking this with simple radio, adds to the atmosphere. Still some folks not on it but at least the majority are.

Edited July 18, 2016 by StandingCow

[QuiGon]

Sry don't know the word "notch" what I mean? Am German.

 

Sweep don't you understand that when there is chaff between a radar missile and the target, and when the target is moving straight away from the missile in a straight line, the missile seeker CAN'T see through there chaff (if huge amount) and WILL detonate on contact/close proximity to the chaff (depending on fuze) ? Glad I could teach u sth. and that u learned sth. :)

 

Missiles exploding on chaff? That's new too me :huh:

 

About notching (~"seitwärts fliegen") and chaff and stuff: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=2821850#post2821850

Pages 60 and 61 in the german version. ;)

Edited July 18, 2016 by QuiGon

[dannyq8]

Also please bring back R-77 until Matra 530 vs. chaff is fixed (currently chaff completely useless, I already reported it).

 

C'mon mate don't ask for something to be added (R-77) until something you believe is broken (Matra 530) is fixed.

 

Reading the post you made about this issue, it doesn't appear that it is definitely broken.

 

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=170555

[StandingCow]

Simpleradio might bring another dimension to blueflag... trying to find out enemy radio frequencies and encryption if they are using it.

[Voodooflies]

Also please bring back R-77 until Matra 530 vs. chaff is fixed (currently chaff completely useless, I already reported it).

 

This one made my day. :megalol: Not to mention, the RDI is still WIP onboard the M-2000C. That said, it looses lock very easily.

 

Standing-by for Simple Radio Standalone frequencies page on Blue Flag.

[Sweep]

Sry don't know the word "notch" what I mean? Am German.

 

Sweep don't you understand that when there is chaff between a radar missile and the target, and when the target is moving straight away from the missile in a straight line, the missile seeker CAN'T see through there chaff (if huge amount) and WILL detonate on contact/close proximity to the chaff (depending on fuze) ? Glad I could teach u sth. and that u learned sth. :)

 

IRL or in-game?

 

In-game, it doesn't work that way - The missile goes after chaff and its *done*, it shoots off to nowhere and times-out or hits the deck.

 

IRL there are other problems with low aspect targets - At least with older missiles... ;)

[D4n]

In-game, it doesn't work that way - The missile goes after chaff and its *done*, it shoots off to nowhere and times-out or hits the deck.

 

Then weird that my chaff didn't work although the missile was on my six.

[QuiGon]

Then weird that my chaff didn't work although the missile was on my six.

 

If you don't turn, the missile will just fly straight through the chaff, reacquire you and splash you.

[D4n]

But Sweep wrote the missile is "done, it shoots off to nowhere and times-out or hits the deck."

[BodyOrgan]

If you don't turn, the missile will just fly straight through the chaff, reacquire you and splash you.

 

Not in this case. He's speaking of Blue Flag, and right now there aren't any active missiles, so if the missile is defeated by chaff, then they'll be no reacquiring.

 

Right now missiles are buggered up pretty hard, so I think a simple bug report of "fix the missiles" will suffice, but then I think that's been on the list for 20 years, and with each patch we keep getting these amazing results. Maybe we should tell them the missiles are perfect, so they can break it in the other direction.

[Ktulu2]

I think we should just fly with Sparrow II and AIM-4s. Who knows...IRL ones might even beat the missiles we have in a few patches lol

[Voodooflies]

But Sweep wrote the missile is "done, it shoots off to nowhere and times-out or hits the deck."

 

Are you familiar with defensive tactics ?

[D4n]

Yes.

 

Hey, what is the function of the new introduced comm arrays? Simply EWR that can be captured or only destroyed?

 

And can Gazelle transport Kub and troops aswell? (Kub radar and 3 launchers together or one by one?)

[Beeroshima]

Ive been told they extend the range of EWR'S in that pak if you control them.

 

Sent while I should be working instead.

[Chrinik]

So, since I understand removing the A-10C is a bad idea, how about limiting targeting pods?

 

Also, the fuel deal was made so that both fighters take about 5 minutes to refuel to full...a 0% Flanker would need about 7, has no ability to carry bags and cut this process short in a pinch and so on.

 

And this argument that "you can´t fight with bags on!" yes you can...disadvantaged, but then again you did just take off within a couple seconds rather then wait for 5 minutes, so you want to have your cake and eat it, too?

Edited July 19, 2016 by Chrinik

[Beeroshima]

So, since I understand removing the A-10C is a bad idea, how about limiting targeting pods?

 

Also, the fuel deal was made so that both fighters take about 5 minutes to refuel to full...a 0% Flanker would need about 7, has no ability to carry bags and cut this process short in a pinch and so on.

 

And this argument that "you can´t fight with bags on!" yes you can...disadvantaged, but then again you did just take off within a couple seconds rather then wait for 5 minutes, so you want to have your cake and eat it, too?

If we're doing 80's only and you wanna get rid of targeting pods, you cool with giving away ka50's as well? They weren't around in the 80's.

 

Sent while I should be working instead.