Jump to content

WWII Multiplayer poll. We need your opinion

eekz

By eekz
in Western Europe 1944-1945

 Share

WWII Multiplayer poll. We need your opinion  

85 members have voted

  1. 1. WWII Multiplayer poll. We need your opinion

    • 1. I want to fly over Nevada map, and will do when there will be such WWII server
      8
    • 2. I'd better kept flying at Caucasus. Someday Normandy will come out, and then...
      43
    • 3. I don't care much about the map. I have Nevada and will fly over any map that is on the server.
      31
    • 4. I don't care about multiplayer.
      3

Recommended Posts

gavagai

gavagai

Posted
Posted

I was only able to try out Nevada a few minutes ago before I leave for work in the morning (it was downloading overnight). Please leave this poll up for a few days so I can vote intelligently. Thanks!

P-51D | Fw 190D-9 | Bf 109K-4 | Spitfire Mk IX | P-47D | WW2 assets pack | F-86 | Mig-15 | Mig-21 | Mirage 2000C | A-10C II | F-5E | F-16 | F/A-18 | Ka-50 | Combined Arms | FC3 | Nevada | Normandy | Straight of Hormuz | Syria

Solty

Solty

Posted
Posted

I have voted on 2.

 

The map has nothing to do with WW2 aircombat of 1944. We don't even have planes to fly with over desert trying to to simulate Africa 1941-43. I am waiting for Normandy.

 

The map is also too expensive to justify its purchase. It costs nearly as a AAA game and it exceeds the price of a AAA game in my country (120PLN vs 201PLN). I don't see the justification of value for the price.

  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]In 21st century there is only war and ponies.

 

My experience: Jane's attack squadron, IL2 for couple of years, War Thunder and DCS.

My channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyAXX9rAX_Sqdc0IKJuv6dA

QuiGon

QuiGon

Posted
Posted

I prefer realistic scenarios, so I voted for the 3rd option, mainly because of Normandy. For the two current maps I think that the BS map might be a bit closer to an authentic WW2 environment, but I can also imagine afrika missions in NTTR.

 

What is more important than the map is the actual mission design.

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

Tornado3 small.jpg

otto

otto

Posted
Posted
I have voted on 2.

 

The map has nothing to do with WW2 aircombat of 1944. We don't even have planes to fly with over desert trying to to simulate Africa 1941-43. I am waiting for Normandy.

 

The map is also too expensive to justify its purchase. It costs nearly as a AAA game and it exceeds the price of a AAA game in my country (120PLN vs 201PLN). I don't see the justification of value for the price.

 

+1

saburo_cz

saburo_cz

Posted
Posted

Caucasus map offers more options than NTTR, so I voted No.2.

(although already have NTTR)

F6F

P-51D | P-47D |  F4U-1D |  Mosquito FB Mk VI | Spitfire | Fw 190D | Fw 190A | Bf 109K | WWII Assets Pack

Normandy 2 | The Channel | Sinai | Syria | PG | NTTR | South Atlantic 

 F-4E | F-14A/B |  F/A-18 | F-86 | F-16C | A-10C | FC-3 | CA | SC |

Alladyn

Alladyn

Posted
Posted

My vote don't count. I will fly multi only on Normandy, or any other theatre 1939-1945

I'm dedicated only to World War II

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

TwilightZone

TwilightZone

Posted
Posted

i'm sure whatever maps come out i'll get just to have the variety.....having said that i still would like to see a true WWII period map with airfields and vehicals of the same era.:joystick:

P-51, 190-D9, 109-K4, Spitfire MK IX, Normandy, and everything else:joystick:

i7 4770K, 4.3ghz, 32gb ram, Windows-10 Pro, Z87 Exstreme4, Corsair 850w psu, Samsung Evo 1T SSD & 250 SSD, Titan-X 12gb OC, Asus ROG Swift 27"/1440p/144hz/1ms monitor, Trackir 5, TM Warthog & 10cm extension, Saitek TPM, MFG crosswind pedals

WinterH

WinterH

Posted
Posted (edited)

I may or may not get Normandy when it comes, but won't be getting NTTR myself. So I'd prefer most servers to have a Caucasus map available. I didn't vote because there is no option for I don't have it and I won't have it. Anyway, I don't fly online much, so take my opinion for what it is: just voicing of opinion :).

Edited by WinterH
typo

Wishlist: F-4E Block 53 +, MiG-27K, Su-17M3 or M4, AH-1F or W circa 80s or early 90s, J35 Draken, Kfir C7, Mirage III/V

DCS-Dismounts Script

Ala13_ManOWar

Ala13_ManOWar

Posted
Posted

I want a full WWII theatre of course, but IMO it doesn't matter the map while we're waiting. I'm not flying quite much lately for various reasons, but in a regular basis I won't wait and miss the experience of these warbirds just because where I'm flying.

 

My vote don't count. I will fly multi only on Normandy, or any other theatre 1939-1945

I'm dedicated only to World War II

So Kuban map is a WWII scenery :smilewink:.

 

S!

"I went into the British Army believing that if you want peace you must prepare for war. I believe now that if you prepare for war, you get war."

-- Major-General Frederick B. Maurice

fastfreddie

fastfreddie

Posted
Posted

Why not ... just use the empty area in the NW portion of the map where there are 2 airfields and nothing in between. Its not like we're currently using a map where the Dora, Mustang, and K-4 saw any activity to begin with for those "strictly realist". It may be another year or more before we see the Normandy map so hopefully some servers run desert missions from time to time.

Cripple

Cripple

Posted
Posted
Why not ... just use the empty area in the NW portion of the map where there are 2 airfields and nothing in between. Its not like we're currently using a map where the Dora, Mustang, and K-4 saw any activity to begin with for those "strictly realist". It may be another year or more before we see the Normandy map so hopefully some servers run desert missions from time to time.

 

Can we set boundaries on the map? If so, that would indeed be rather cool.

My *new* AV-8B sim-pit build thread:

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3901589

 

The old Spitfire sim-pit build thread circa '16/17:

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=143452

Talisman_VR

Talisman_VR

Posted
Posted

Voted 2 as I am waiting for Normandy map and have no interest at all in Nevada for goodness sake!

As a WWII enthusiast I am feeling like the poor relation to the more modern fast jet community at the moment.

I, and many squad mates and fellow WWII flyers that I am trying to convert to DCS are not seeing much reason to rush into action with DCS yet.

We live in hope that WWII is going to be shown to be deliverable.

I have stopped any interaction with DCS at the moment, apart from the forum, because everything is in a state of flux and somewhat confusing. When can we expect some sort of public release for the next stage of either v1.5 or 2 that does not include the Nevada map and what are the options for WWII focused groups who want to fly decent public release MP maps and servers?

My P51D is mothballed at the moment pending a more stable, inclusive and equitable product across the board.

No pain no gain as they say, so I am waiting and trusting in DCS for now. I am hoping that in the future DCS will be 'the' place for the best WWII experience, just like it appears to be for more modern fast jet action now.

 

Happy landings,

 

Talisman

Bell_UH-1 side.png

fastfreddie

fastfreddie

Posted
Posted
Can we set boundaries on the map? If so, that would indeed be rather cool.

 

Not that I know of but the Groom Lake AFB and Creech AFB would be perfect for WWII combat. Small airfields about 10 minutes apart with nothing but open/mountainous terrain that I'm sure we can find some type of Algeria/Tunisia missions to throw in there. It will be up to server operators as some are more open to different mission types than others but I'm pretty tired of looking at the Caucasus map at this point.

Captain Orso

Captain Orso

Posted
Posted

I voted 3, but it's really not my answer, because you haven't asked the question correctly.

 

I've per-purchased NTTR, so that's not a question for me. I'll also fly WW-II missions on it, because... why not? Besides, the landscape will be new and purdy after all the time in the Caucuses.

 

However, I'm still looking forward to a Europe map with WW-II era airfields and equipment, which I will definitely also acquire, no doubt about it.

 

So, that's my answer :)

When you hit the wrong button on take-off

hwl7xqL.gif

System Specs.

Spoiler
System board: MSI X670E ACE Memory: 64GB DDR5-6000 G.Skill Ripjaw System disk: Crucial P5 M.2 2TB
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D PSU: Corsair HX1200 PSU Monitor: ASUS MG279Q, 27"
CPU cooling: Noctua NH-D15S Graphics card: MSI RTX 3090Ti SuprimX VR: Oculus Rift CV1
 
Ripcord03

Ripcord03

Posted
Posted
I have voted on 2.

 

The map has nothing to do with WW2 aircombat of 1944. We don't even have planes to fly with over desert trying to to simulate Africa 1941-43. I am waiting for Normandy.

 

The map is also too expensive to justify its purchase. It costs nearly as a AAA game and it exceeds the price of a AAA game in my country (120PLN vs 201PLN). I don't see the justification of value for the price.

 

Ditto. I voted #2 as well.

 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...