Jump to content

Harrier poll  

542 members have voted

  1. 1. Harrier poll

    • AV-8B Harrier II Night Attack
      250
    • GR7/GR9 Harrier
      293


Recommended Posts

Posted

Even as is too early to actually start creating a Harrier devoted forum, i wanted to know what kind of Harrier you were craving for, so here is a poll

questions is simple

A: AV-8B Harrier II Night Attack

B: GR7/9 Harrier

  • Replies 205
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I expect I'll be outvoted here but for me it's the GR9 all the way!

Ditto

Intel® i9 9900K Coffee Lake OC 5.1GHz, ASUS ROG Maximum Formula LGA1151 MB, Windows 10® 64bit Pro, 64GB 3200MHz DDR4 RAM, EVGA Black Edition 2080Ti OC GPU, 2 x Samsung Evo 970 NVMe 1TB Drives, 1 x Samsung Evo 860 2TB SSD, 1 x Seagate 2TB HDD, 1 x Acer™ Predator 35" 4K Wide Flat Monitor, TM Warthog HOTAS, MFG Crosswind pedals, Oculus Rift S

Posted (edited)

I'll be happy with either, but the Av-8B nudges out the Gr. due too it getting an actual gun pod, and that makes up for a good chunk of fun in any sim. Even if it wasn't for that, I would still want the Av-8B because 1. Marine Corps 2. It would be awesome to fly with the F-18 and F-14.

 

But I would honestly be happy with either.

Edited by Bullfrog_
Posted
AV-8B because of the ability to mount a gun.

 

GR7/9 because of two extra sidewinders on dedicated pylons mounted on stations 1A and 7A which also contain countermeasures dispensers. That and the ability to carry a targeting pod (TIALD, LITENING or SNIPER) and TERMA countermeasures pod on the stations 4A and 4B in place of the non existent gun's which also free up space on stations 3 and 5 for weapons carriage. Those would be far more valuable than 300 rounds of 25mm for the GAU-12. Stations 4A and 4B are far better positions for targeting pods than stations 3 and 5 on the AV-8B(NA) as they have a much larger field of view being mounted that low on the airframe.

 

I voted GR7/GR9. my assumption being that RAZBAM will eventually do an AV-8B+ with the APG-65 in the future. Additionally, the choice of Harrier GR9 practically guarantees the inclusion of a targeting pod whereas the AV-8B Night Attack does not have that kind of guarantee as it spent the first half of its career without one.

Truly superior pilots are those that use their superior judgment to avoid those situations where they might have to use their superior skills.

 

If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck!

 

"If at first you don't succeed, Carrier Landings are not for you!"

Posted (edited)

AV-8B hands down, and I finally broke down and got a forum account just to say it.

 

At the risk of seeming too 'Merika-centric, the AV-8B is the most iconic jump jet in the world and the Night Attack variant offers a lot of outstanding opportunity for an amazing ground-attack aircraft. It wouldn't be the first night fighter in DCS, with the A10C offering enough onboard systems to fill that role just fine, but to me that proves that any extra armament on the GR9 would prove irrelevant when someone can just as easily use the Warthog in an online match. That would make the Harrier a forgettable and irrelevant addition to the DCS line-up, and would be a very poor choice on the part of RAZBAM marketing.

 

Meanwhile, the AV-8's gun pod and VTOL capabilities (versus the GR7s mostly STOL takeoff) would make for a fun, interesting, and unique edition that people will be sure to purchase instead of just passing over it in favor of other ground-attack or multirole airframes. Bare in mind by the time the Harrier launches the Mirage 2000 will likely take the fore-front as the premier multi role airframe in DCS, making the GR9 irrelevant as a tactical fighter as well. The only future this module seems to have would be by embracing the gun pod, VTOL engagement, and the optics systems that would only be available in the AV-8B package.

 

With the AV-8B, the Harrier will become an important team player in flights after the introduction of the F14 and F18 while remaining relevant in an online setting. Moreover, the AV8 can use in-game Naval assets that are already available by launching from American aircraft carriers instead of relying on the addition of new British naval assets that rely on the use of a ski-jump to launch fighters.

Edited by Warrior Nine
Posted

I voted GR7/GR9. my assumption being that RAZBAM will eventually do an AV-8B+ with the APG-65 in the future. Additionally, the choice of Harrier GR9 practically guarantees the inclusion of a targeting pod whereas the AV-8B Night Attack does not have that kind of guarantee as it spent the first half of its career without one.

 

 

It would be awesome if we got the GR.7/9 now and the Av-8B+ later, or the Av-8B(NA) now and the Sea Harrier later.

 

I'm not sure if the Av-8B+ can carry HARMs but I know the Sea Harrier can carry ALARMS, would be awesome to have it for that alone.

Posted (edited)

The GR9 is just better,

 

No. 1 has to come with a TGP for it be authentic not really a way out of that. Unlike the F-14A/B with LN which could go either way.

 

No. 2 equally awesome, It can carry more Also with the GR9 your able to load things in far more configurations then the AV-8B. No gun but, who cares..If you want some gun action use the A-10

 

Both of those reasons make it much more versatile then the AV-8B and I think that makes the GR 9 better i.e. it can do everything the AV-8B can and more.

Edited by Wizard_03

DCS F/A-18C :sorcerer:

Posted

I would say you guys should make the variant of which you have more data and documentation for it. I'm happy with both, although I find the AV-8B a tad more appealing.

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

Tornado3 small.jpg

Posted

the AV-8B + would probably been the ultimate variant but would probably be alot harder to get info about.

 

The AV-8B + has the same APG-65 Radar of the F-18 and is AIM-120 capable making it both much more effective air-air then the earlier strike harriers.

 

But im probably leaning towards any of the AV-8B variants ahead of the GR-7-9s

 

for the simple reason that the AV-8B has been produced in larger numbers and seen use with multiple nations (currently in use by the US, Spain And Italy.

 

(AV-8B + is in use with all 3 though they all started with earlier AV-8B variants)

Posted (edited)

Harrier poll

 

I'm British but the av8b as its more advanced but then it all comes down to how much razbam is going to model and such......

 

After reading further down looks like there av8b version won't contain half its stuff in that case I vote GR

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Regamuffin

Reg:pilotfly:

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...