Robert31178 Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 Ooooh.....what about a Spark Vark??? Electric Fox for the win!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
probad Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 never gonna happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert31178 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Awwww....... :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostdog688 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Ooooh.....what about a Spark Vark??? Electric Fox for the win!!! ED needs to correctly model jamming and Electronic Warfare before flying an EW aircraft becomes tactically useful. Now, the original f111? That’s another conversation :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostdog688 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 I have been reading some A-6 stuff here this week, one source said twenty eight 500lb bombs could be carried, and another stated that the KA-6D could hoist 13 tons of fuel on five stations and internals. This is off of a carrier deck mind you.... Intruder be like "do you even lift Bro?" The intruder was (and still is) and impressive feat of carrier aviation. The fact that it wasn’t retired until the 90s and even then under considerable pressure (the navy wanted the a12 - basically a super intruder - but were not given the budget for it). We still see them around as EA6’s but not for much longer (basically until there’s enough Growlers in service). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AG-51_Razor Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 I am curious if the KA-6 was able to take on the role of an attack aircraft. It had an awful lot of internal plumbing to make it a KA-6, not just a buddy pack hung on a hard point. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drPhibes Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 According to Squadron Signal In Action #138, the all-weather avionics were removed, but the KA-6D retained the capability to be used for daylight bombing. It doesn't say anything about whether or not this feature was ever used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AG-51_Razor Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Thanks :thumbup: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skypirate Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 OK, I bought the Mirage I also prepurchased the Harrier.. I see 39 pages of Intruder discussion. What more do you Razbam guys need to get to work and make one of the most impressive planes in the history (A6E)?... :) :) :) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Regards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilivan Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 (edited) OK, I bought the Mirage I also prepurchased the Harrier.. I see 39 pages of Intruder discussion. What more do you Razbam guys need to get to work and make one of the most impressive planes in the history (A6E)?... :) :) :) ...the proper implementation of multi-crew maybe? :smilewink: Edited November 28, 2017 by evilivan [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert31178 Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 And a solid ground radar from ED. I know HB and the Community A-4 guys have more or less made their own, but I keep hearing that the 3rd party guys are waiting for the release of Hornet, and the ground radar coding, to implement on future 3rd party releases. Am I close on this or just listening too much to my mates' speculations?? ~Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMax Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 Ok RAZ... maybe you think the Harrier was just an awesome Idea and such a great plane... k.. you decision. But the INTRUDER was a time dominating plane over decades. Like the A7 or the F4. It is now MORE THAN TIME to get an Intruder and go hunting SAM Sites, bridges and the ho chi min track... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prowler111 Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 Ok RAZ... maybe you think the Harrier was just an awesome Idea and such a great plane... k.. you decision. But the INTRUDER was a time dominating plane over decades. Like the A7 or the F4. It is now MORE THAN TIME to get an Intruder and go hunting SAM Sites, bridges and the ho chi min track... Once we have an A/G radar in DCS, it will happen, we already have the 3d assets and they are not the ones we used in FSX or SF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iLOVEwindmills Posted December 1, 2017 Share Posted December 1, 2017 Once we have an A/G radar in DCS, it will happen, we already have the 3d assets and they are not the ones we used in FSX or SF Does this refer to assets for both the A7 and A6 or only the latter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T.Eason Posted December 1, 2017 Share Posted December 1, 2017 My dream aircraft in DCS - oh and a prowler! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phant Posted December 1, 2017 Share Posted December 1, 2017 Once we have an A/G radar in DCS, it will happen, we already have the 3d assets and they are not the ones we used in FSX or SF Prowler, do you have any ETA about availability of AG tech from ED? Bye Phant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kraszus Posted December 1, 2017 Share Posted December 1, 2017 Looking forward to this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chev255 Posted December 1, 2017 Share Posted December 1, 2017 Prowler, do you have any ETA about availability of AG tech from ED? Nice try :music_whistling: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert31178 Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 (edited) What post # is the above post by Prowler 111 as referenced by Phant? ~Rob Edited December 2, 2017 by Robert31178 Spelling error on Phant's name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unknown Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 What post # is the above post by Prowler 111 as referenced by In any? ~Rob It's the last post on page 39. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3306928&postcount=390 I'm looking forward to fly this ugly beauty. :D Modules: KA-50, A-10C, FC3, UH-1H, MI-8MTV2, CA, MIG-21bis, FW-190D9, Bf-109K4, F-86F, MIG-15bis, M-2000C, SA342 Gazelle, AJS-37 Viggen, F/A-18C, F-14, C-101, FW-190A8, F-16C, F-5E, JF-17, SC, Mi-24P Hind, AH-64D Apache, Mirage F1, F-4E Phantom II System: Win 11 Pro 64bit, Ryzen 3800X, 32gb RAM DDR4-3200, PowerColor Radeon RX 6900XT Red Devil ,1 x Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB NVMe, 2 x Samsung SSD 2TB + 1TB SATA, MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals - VIRPIL T-50CM and VIRPIL MongoosT-50 Throttle - HP Reverg G2, using only the latest Open Beta, DCS settings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert31178 Posted December 2, 2017 Share Posted December 2, 2017 Ok, thank you very much. I am too. I enjoyed flying his add on cockpits for Intruder in SF, way more realistic than the stock TW plane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skypirate Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 Once we have an A/G radar in DCS, it will happen, we already have the 3d assets and they are not the ones we used in FSX or SF Guys, don't we have that already in the Viggen? I doubt the A6 radar was much fancier (still remember how the b/n Tiger Cole used to reset/restart the stuck drumms of their A6 radar in the notorious novel). Multi crew is different story. We need to see how the Tomcat Jester will pan out.....:joystick: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Regards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einherjer Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 Guys, don't we have that already in the Viggen? I doubt the A6 radar was much fancier (still remember how the b/n Tiger Cole used to reset/restart the stuck drumms of their A6 radar in the notorious novel). Multi crew is different story. We need to see how the Tomcat Jester will pan out.....:joystick: No - the viggen Radar is just a lethernecks workaround to show some Topography on the scope- but they will not give their work to other 3rd party studios like razbam. You could say- go razbam, build your own radar... but we all know that ED will bring a solid and workable AG radar to DCS world, that would make the work on a workaround solution obsolete... So , let’s wait for the new tools , so we don’t need to fiddle around on such things by hand ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exray Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 i7-4790k @ 4.4GHZ, 32GB G. Skill Ripjaws DDR-2133 RAM, EVGA GTX 1080Ti FTW3, Crucial M500 SSD, VKB MCG, TWCS Throttle, MFG Crosswind, TrackIR 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hansangb Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 I guess it was easier to draw it with front and back? Or did some variants have front/back seating? hsb HW Spec in Spoiler --- i7-10700K Direct-To-Die/OC'ed to 5.1GHz, MSI Z490 MB, 32GB DDR4 3200MHz, EVGA 2080 Ti FTW3, NVMe+SSD, Win 10 x64 Pro, MFG, Warthog, TM MFDs, Komodo Huey set, Rverbe G1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts