A-6 "Intruder" by Razbam

[Robert31178]

Ooooh.....what about a Spark Vark??? Electric Fox for the win!!!

[probad]

never gonna happen.

[Robert31178]

Awwww.......

 

:-(

[ghostdog688]

Ooooh.....what about a Spark Vark??? Electric Fox for the win!!!

 

 

 

ED needs to correctly model jamming and Electronic Warfare before flying an EW aircraft becomes tactically useful.

 

Now, the original f111? That’s another conversation :)

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ghostdog688]

I have been reading some A-6 stuff here this week, one source said twenty eight 500lb bombs could be carried, and another stated that the KA-6D could hoist 13 tons of fuel on five stations and internals. This is off of a carrier deck mind you....

 

Intruder be like "do you even lift Bro?"

 

 

 

The intruder was (and still is) and impressive feat of carrier aviation. The fact that it wasn’t retired until the 90s and even then under considerable pressure (the navy wanted the a12 - basically a super intruder - but were not given the budget for it). We still see them around as EA6’s but not for much longer (basically until there’s enough Growlers in service).

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[AG-51_Razor]

I am curious if the KA-6 was able to take on the role of an attack aircraft. It had an awful lot of internal plumbing to make it a KA-6, not just a buddy pack hung on a hard point.

[drPhibes]

According to Squadron Signal In Action #138, the all-weather avionics were removed, but the KA-6D retained the capability to be used for daylight bombing. It doesn't say anything about whether or not this feature was ever used.

[AG-51_Razor]

Thanks :thumbup:

[skypirate]

OK, I bought the Mirage I also prepurchased the Harrier.. I see 39 pages of Intruder discussion. What more do you Razbam guys need to get to work and make one of the most impressive planes in the history (A6E)?... :) :) :)

[evilivan]

OK, I bought the Mirage I also prepurchased the Harrier.. I see 39 pages of Intruder discussion. What more do you Razbam guys need to get to work and make one of the most impressive planes in the history (A6E)?... :) :) :)

 

...the proper implementation of multi-crew maybe? :smilewink:

Edited November 28, 2017 by evilivan

[Robert31178]

And a solid ground radar from ED. I know HB and the Community A-4 guys have more or less made their own, but I keep hearing that the 3rd party guys are waiting for the release of Hornet, and the ground radar coding, to implement on future 3rd party releases.

 

Am I close on this or just listening too much to my mates' speculations??

 

~Rob

[BlueMax]

Ok RAZ... maybe you think the Harrier was just an awesome Idea and such a great plane... k.. you decision. But the INTRUDER was a time dominating plane over decades. Like the A7 or the F4. It is now MORE THAN TIME to get an Intruder and go hunting SAM Sites, bridges and the ho chi min track...

[Prowler111]

Ok RAZ... maybe you think the Harrier was just an awesome Idea and such a great plane... k.. you decision. But the INTRUDER was a time dominating plane over decades. Like the A7 or the F4. It is now MORE THAN TIME to get an Intruder and go hunting SAM Sites, bridges and the ho chi min track...

Once we have an A/G radar in DCS, it will happen, we already have the 3d assets and they are not the ones we used in FSX or SF

[iLOVEwindmills]

Once we have an A/G radar in DCS, it will happen, we already have the 3d assets and they are not the ones we used in FSX or SF

 

Does this refer to assets for both the A7 and A6 or only the latter?

[T.Eason]

My dream aircraft in DCS - oh and a prowler!

[phant]

 

Once we have an A/G radar in DCS, it will happen, we already have the 3d assets and they are not the ones we used in FSX or SF

 

Prowler, do you have any ETA about availability of AG tech from ED?

 

 

Bye

Phant

[kraszus]

Looking forward to this!

[chev255]

Prowler, do you have any ETA about availability of AG tech from ED?

 

Nice try :music_whistling:

[Robert31178]

What post # is the above post by Prowler 111 as referenced by Phant?

 

~Rob

Edited December 2, 2017 by Robert31178
Spelling error on Phant's name

[unknown]

What post # is the above post by Prowler 111 as referenced by In any?

 

~Rob

It's the last post on page 39.

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3306928&postcount=390

 

I'm looking forward to fly this ugly beauty. :D

[Robert31178]

Ok, thank you very much. I am too. I enjoyed flying his add on cockpits for Intruder in SF, way more realistic than the stock TW plane.

[skypirate]

Once we have an A/G radar in DCS, it will happen, we already have the 3d assets and they are not the ones we used in FSX or SF

 

Guys, don't we have that already in the Viggen? I doubt the A6 radar was much fancier (still remember how the b/n Tiger Cole used to reset/restart the stuck drumms of their A6 radar in the notorious novel).

 

Multi crew is different story. We need to see how the Tomcat Jester will pan out.....:joystick:

[Einherjer]

Guys, don't we have that already in the Viggen? I doubt the A6 radar was much fancier (still remember how the b/n Tiger Cole used to reset/restart the stuck drumms of their A6 radar in the notorious novel).

 

 

 

Multi crew is different story. We need to see how the Tomcat Jester will pan out.....:joystick:

 

 

 

No - the viggen Radar is just a lethernecks workaround to show some Topography on the scope- but they will not give their work to other 3rd party studios like razbam.

 

You could say- go razbam, build your own radar... but we all know that ED will bring a solid and workable AG radar to DCS world, that would make the work on a workaround solution obsolete...

 

So , let’s wait for the new tools , so we don’t need to fiddle around on such things by hand ;)

[exray]

[hansangb]

I guess it was easier to draw it with front and back? Or did some variants have front/back seating?