Darlakan Posted July 3, 2019 Posted July 3, 2019 (edited) When having the F-14B equiped with 1 or more TALDS speed seems to be greatly reduced. this speed reduction continues even after launching/jettisoning both the TALD and the racks. making it so that in an almost clean config the F-14B is barely able to substain mach 1 on AB, Tested on multiple heights. To reproduce simply equip any amount of TALDS to the F-14B and keep an eye on your speed guage pre and post jettison/launch. Edited July 22, 2019 by IronMike
IronMike Posted July 3, 2019 Posted July 3, 2019 Thank you, we will investigate that. Heatblur Simulations Please feel free to contact me anytime, either via PM here, on the forums, or via email through the contact form on our homepage. http://www.heatblur.com/ https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/
IronMike Posted July 4, 2019 Posted July 4, 2019 Thank you Silvern. Heatblur Simulations Please feel free to contact me anytime, either via PM here, on the forums, or via email through the contact form on our homepage. http://www.heatblur.com/ https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/
mattag08 Posted July 21, 2019 Posted July 21, 2019 Just updating this post, my unit conducted an operation in multiplayer using TALDs just now without afterburner we could not achieve a speed greater than 300 KIAS at any altitude. Four separate aircraft with four pilots and three RIOs. We launched the TALDs on a target, no increase in performance. We then dropped the racks that were carrying the TALDs and still gained no performance increase. It very much feels like someone accidentally moved a coefficient of drag one order of magnitude last patch. Flying the DCS: F-14B from Heatblur Simulations with Carrier Strike Group 2 and the VF-154 Black Knights! I also own: Ka-50 2, A-10C, P-51D, UH-1H, Mi-8MTV2, FC3, F-86F, CA, Mig-15bis, Mig-21bis, F/A-18C, L-39, F-5E, AV-8B, AJS-37, F-16C, Mig-19P, JF-17, C-101, and CEII
fat creason Posted July 21, 2019 Posted July 21, 2019 (edited) https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3980929&postcount=20 TLDR: We think something strange is going on with stores drag or gross weight on the DCS side but we’re not entirely sure. We're working with ED to get to the bottom of it. Edited July 21, 2019 by fat creason Systems Engineer & FM Modeler Heatblur Simulations
Home Fries Posted July 21, 2019 Posted July 21, 2019 Another data point: the TALD reduces performance and ceiling (likely parasitic drag), even after launching all TALDs. However, jettisoning the racks puts the jet's perfomance back in norms. -Home Fries My DCS Files and Skins My DCS TARGET Profile for Cougar or Warthog and MFDs F-14B LANTIRN Guide
fat creason Posted July 21, 2019 Posted July 21, 2019 If anyone can provide track files or videos of any ordinance being released at constant power and level flight that would be appreciated. We need to gather examples of this happening. Systems Engineer & FM Modeler Heatblur Simulations
Ramsay Posted July 21, 2019 Posted July 21, 2019 (edited) If anyone can provide track files or videos of any ordinance being released at constant power and level flight that would be appreciated. Here's a track, it's not very precise but should do. Tacview shows I'm in error and the track didn't show what I thought Stores Dropped ... Change in airspeed (TAS) after 1 minute • 4x TALDs ... 414 -> 427 TAS after 1 minute • 2x AIM-9 ... 428 -> 437 TAS after 1 minute • 2x AIM-7 ... 438 -> 453 TAS after 1 minute • 4x bomb racks 459 -> 473 TAS after 1 minute Tested Open Beta 2.5.5.33552, default settings @ 14,000 ft, Kobuleti - Sochi Edited July 23, 2019 by Ramsay Tacview shows I'm in error and the track doesn't show what I thought i9 9900K @4.8GHz, 64GB DDR4, RTX4070 12GB, 1+2TB NVMe, 6+4TB HD, 4+1TB SSD, Winwing Orion 2 F-15EX Throttle + F-16EX Stick, TPR Pedals, TIR5, Win 11 Pro x64, Odyssey G93SC 5120X1440
Skarp Posted July 23, 2019 Posted July 23, 2019 Here are some of the full mill speeds I was able to achieve with the different weapons. I'm not sure if the gbu38 is correct I can get to almost 1.1mach at full mil? But I can't get there with only 2 aim9m and 2 aim7?
fat creason Posted July 23, 2019 Posted July 23, 2019 Maybe the GBU38 is the sleekest bomb ever designed! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Systems Engineer & FM Modeler Heatblur Simulations
QuiGon Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 But isn't the GBU-38 a JDAM which our Tomcat shouldn't have? :huh: Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
viper2097 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 TLDR: We think something strange is going on with stores drag or gross weight on the DCS side but we’re not entirely sure. We're working with ED to get to the bottom of it. Not sure if it may also belongs to that over all problem, but I had a strange experience two days ago on the GAW server: Took off with the cat on the Stennis with tanks, 4x Aim9, 2x Aim54 and 1x Aim 7. Shot all except the Aim7 in a furball. Landed on Mayhkop, refueld and rearmed. Took off and was not able to gain more then 20kft and 150kts IAS without burner. Felt pretty weird as my buddies with the F-18 had no problem to climb to 35kft and mach 0.8 without any burner and also full ordnance. May it possible, that rearming doubled my drag? It felt that way... Steam user - Youtube I am for quality over quantity in DCS modules
CaptJodan Posted August 15, 2019 Posted August 15, 2019 Sorry to necro this, but has there been any movement on this issue? I've noticed it's still around. Track file included.Tald.trk
Recommended Posts