Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

 

Operation Snowbird: Stunning air-to-air shots of 184th Fighter Squadron A-10Cs by Jim Haseltine

 

By Joachim Jacob, Warthog News Editor

snowbirds2012.jpg

snowbirds3.jpg

 

snowbirds2.jpg

  • Like 3

ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup:

Posted

AF.mil Week in Photos 03/02

 

KoBaZ.jpg

Red Flag

Capt. Brandon Lavalley (left) and Maj. Derrick Vincent, both pilots assigned to the 4th Fighter Squadron, fly toward the Nevada Test and Training Range on day three of Red Flag 12-2 at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev. Coalition partners from South Korea and Saudi Arabia participated in the joint training exercise. (U.S. Air Force photo/Master Sgt. Ben Bloker)

 

uvb7R.jpg

Exercise Cope North

A KC-135 Stratotanker refuels an F-16 Fighting Falcon over the Pacific Ocean during Exercise Cope North 2012 on Feb. 16, 2012. The U.S. Air Force, the Japanese Air Self Defense and the Royal Australian Air Force began Exercise Cope North 2012 here Feb. 11. The exercise, which ran through Feb. 24, was the latest in a series of multinational exercises designed to enhance each country's air operations. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Posted

Seen this sometime ago, can't find high res :(

 

scaled.php?server=29&filename=0502uacrussiaru.jpg&res=medium

Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D

ಠ_ಠ



Posted

rvR2aXIMBco&feature

  • Like 1

To whom it may concern,

I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that.

Thank you for you patience.

 

 

Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..

Posted

The french are not having as much trouble. They have mature carriers that were built recently and the planes to go along. I cannot understand why the british impose so many budget cuts and their programs are still increasingly expensive and behind schedule. Its such a shame I feel for them.

.

Posted
The french are not having as much trouble. They have mature carriers that were built recently and the planes to go along. I cannot understand why the british impose so many budget cuts and their programs are still increasingly expensive and behind schedule. Its such a shame I feel for them.

 

Why? Iraq? Afghanistan? where do you think the money comes from then?

 

Come pay us a visit on YouTube - search for HELI SHED

Main Banner.PNG

Posted (edited)
The UK MoD has a long history, not to say an impressive pedigree in botching up defense projects, but the carrier saga beats it all. I really wish we could zap to 2020 just to see on what ship which aircraft will be landing. :=)

 

:music_whistling: It'll be French for sure, which i haven't a problem with. An awesome Naval force, what better way to seal FF FE relationships? We are already training fairly hard with French Ground Forces, particulary Infantry ~(my own area of expertise) and HAC and Arty. It's only been recent, but after serving 26 years so far, i welcome it!

Edited by Tyger

 

Come pay us a visit on YouTube - search for HELI SHED

Main Banner.PNG

Posted
Wellington turns in his grave.

 

Not even mentioning the grumbles coming from the St Paul's crypt.

Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career?

Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell....

One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'

Posted

lmfao!

 

Well as a serving soldier actualy 'doing it' and not sat in an armchair criticising, My opinion has far more weight, like it or loathe it. Not that i really care.

 

Wellington was actually Irish despite his fantastic successes, which of course we all know, were made in a boardroom or on a horse!

 

St Pauls crypt grumbling, aye, probably, but again as we have our own chapel in the cathedral (MBE), I'll have words with them too. ;-)

 

'T'

 

Come pay us a visit on YouTube - search for HELI SHED

Main Banner.PNG

Posted

My opinion has far more weight, like it or loathe it. Not that i really care.

Your opinion, for what it is, has no more weight than the rest of us. 'Ole boy.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

Some day, the irish, scots, and british will live peaceful in harmony. Meanwhile, us german peepz are sitting here drinking beer and laughing at all of you. :)

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Wasn't our carrier [design] supposed to be easy the convert from a ski resort into a porpa carrier..??

 

Some day, the irish, scots, and british will live peaceful in harmony. Meanwhile, us german peepz are sitting here drinking beer and laughing at all of you. smile.gif

 

We do, but the goverments can't.

Edited by joey45

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.

"Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.."

https://ko-fi.com/joey45

 

Posted

As I recall the arguments that I have read in the press about the carrier issue, it boils down to this:

 

- The F-35C has more payload and range than F-35B

- weapon bays are larger, offering more weapon integration options

- It could also be used by RAF as a long range strike aircraft, flying from land bases

- It can takeoff and land on the Charles the Gaulle using cat & trap

- adapting the Britisch carrier to cat & trap would allow Rafales to take-off and land from it. Hence Britain and France would operate two carriers together, and always have one available while one is in overhaul

- F-35C is supposed to cost less than F-35B

 

- F-35B can already land/takeoff on any carrier, also on WASP class carrier, maybe also on Mistral, and could do the same on Spanish and Italian vessels

- has much more basing options, closer to the conflict

- will be fielded much sooner than F-35C: this would mean less time having a carrier without planes

- costly refit of carrier to cat & trap is not necessary and saves money

- cat & trap operations are difficult and require substantial training. This would be detrimental to RAF usage

- F-35B take-off and landing is supposed to be revolutionary simple compared to Harrier

- cooperation with US is still possible, even on more carriers.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...