Lucas_From_Hell Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 The title of the thread is "Patch 1.13 Requested Features..." New airplanes designed form scratch is alot to ask for a patch. But he's not asking for new aircraft, only for a flyable. So, if ED made the F/A-18C flyable, I guess it would work too. (But I still think modernizing the MiGs is more urgent than that :D)
vrv Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 They already have the models and it is entirely doable. I am not expecting a Su-25t level FM but it just seems like NATO could use another flyable. But modernizing the Su-27 or MiG-29 would be paramount. Imagine flying in these pits: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] EtherealN: I will promptly perform a sex change and offer my hand in marriage to whomever
GGTharos Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 Not going to happen, stop asking for it. :) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Lucas_From_Hell Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 Not going to happen, stop asking for it. :) The NATO carrier-based fighter, the upgraded MiG (or/and Sukhoi), or both :D? I think everyone here is aware of the grounding of the MiG-29 fleet, after two crashes on Siberia. After that, they started repairs due to corrosion and upgrading the MiGs to the current SMT standards. Maybe if you guys just brought them to the earlier SMT standards :music_whistling:
GGTharos Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 No new aircraft, I'm sure. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Frostie Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 How about a driveable Ticonderoga then, its already modeled just add a few bells and whistles and hey presto i'll be downing bandits left, right and centre. :D:spam_laser: 1 "[51☭] FROSTIE" #55 'Red 5'. Lord Flashheart 51st PVO "Bisons" - 100 KIAP Regiment Fastest MiG pilot in the world - TCR'10 https://100kiap.org
104th_Crunch Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 (edited) lol. The moon is in Lock On. Maybe they can just whip up an Apollo 11 in a few minutes and we can land there :) Edited October 28, 2009 by Crunch 1
vrv Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 lol. The moon is in Lock On. Maybe they can just whip up an Appolo 11 in a few minutes and we can land there :) DCS: Skunk Works with an additional patch for LOMAC. I called it :pilotfly: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] EtherealN: I will promptly perform a sex change and offer my hand in marriage to whomever
Aeroscout Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 ...finer control of trim in the non-AFM aircraft. +1 This is a big one Aero DCS Wishlist: 1) FIX THE DAMN RIVERS!!! 2) Spherical or cylindrical panorama view projection. 3) Enhanced input options (action upon button release, etc). 4) Aircraft flight parameter dump upon exit (stick posn, attitude, rates, accel, control volume, control-surface positions, SAS bias, etc). 5) ADS-33 maneuver courses as static objects. 6) Exposed API or exports of trim position and stick force for custom controllers. 7) Select auto multiple audio devices
Lucas_From_Hell Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 (edited) Maybe, but in Russian aircraft, it would just inutilize trimming dials and whatsoever... Plus, the centering button wouldn't work also. But I do prefer to have trim on the joystick. Unfortunately, my ***** joystick only has one hat, so, until I upgrade, I can't use it. But I support the idea :D Edit: Just checked the F-15C cockpit, and it also has the trimming on the joystick. About the A-10, I'm not sure, but judging by the sticks look, I guess it also uses the same system. It conflicts a bit with the marketing they used for the G940, saying something like modern aircraft using it and so on... Edited October 28, 2009 by Lucas_From_Hell
pauldy Posted October 29, 2009 Posted October 29, 2009 Decrease the times/rates the AWACS announces contacts to you.. Right now, the English AWACS sounds like a very talkative B**ch~ More like talking every 30-40 seconds unless there are no more hostile contacts... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Lucas_From_Hell Posted October 29, 2009 Posted October 29, 2009 Pauldy's idea is interesting. However, I don't know how it actually works in real life. But yes, it sometimes is annoying. "Chevy 11, Olympus. Contact bearing..." (I'm still a bit confused it they are going or not to consider the MiG-29S and/or Su-27 upgrade. Maybe a surprise :D? Don't care. Only knowing that they will someday give us an update to our beloved game makes me happy :).)
71st_Mastiff Posted October 30, 2009 Posted October 30, 2009 (edited) as it has been almost 6 months since any word from Wags himself, I'm beginning to wonder? :huh: Eagle Dynamics Update – 03 May 2009 Edited October 30, 2009 by Mastiff "any failure you meet, is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back", W Forbes. "Success is not final, failure is not fatal, it is the courage to continue that counts", "He who never changes his mind, never changes anything," Winston Churchill. MSI z690 MPG DDR4 || i9-14900k|| ddr4-128gb PC3200 |zotac RTX 5080|Game max 1300w|Win11| |turtle beach elite pro 5.1|| ViRpiL,T50cm2||MFG Crosswinds|| VT50CM-plus rotor Throttle || G10 RGB EVGA Keyboard/MouseLogitech || PiMax Crystal VR || 32 Asus||
thaFunkster Posted October 30, 2009 Posted October 30, 2009 I have a feature request. A release date! +100 Funk on YouTube!
Prophet Posted November 1, 2009 Posted November 1, 2009 Well its been 2 years since this thread started. It would be a huge surprise to me to see anything come out. A welcome surprise, but one none the less.
Sanch0 Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 Enforce separate engines startup, so the simple startup procedure will be more real and takes more time. PVAF "A fighter without a gun... is like an airplane without a wing" dedicated to F-4 Phantom
3Sqn_Sven Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 I take full credit. It's my 1.14 ranting that got us all past the requests for 1.13. Ed loved is so much they said "screw it, we'll call it 2.0". I told you all so! 3Sqn - Largest distributor of Flanker, Fulcrum and Frogfoot parts in the Black Sea Region
71st_Mastiff Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 it wasn't you it was me! lol "any failure you meet, is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back", W Forbes. "Success is not final, failure is not fatal, it is the courage to continue that counts", "He who never changes his mind, never changes anything," Winston Churchill. MSI z690 MPG DDR4 || i9-14900k|| ddr4-128gb PC3200 |zotac RTX 5080|Game max 1300w|Win11| |turtle beach elite pro 5.1|| ViRpiL,T50cm2||MFG Crosswinds|| VT50CM-plus rotor Throttle || G10 RGB EVGA Keyboard/MouseLogitech || PiMax Crystal VR || 32 Asus||
Vekkinho Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 Enforce separate engines startup, so the simple startup procedure will be more real and takes more time. Why?! You can always do it yourself (LShift , LAlt) but if enforced you'll never be able to spool both at the same time if you're in a hurry. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
joey45 Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 (edited) as it has been almost 6 months since any word from Wags himself, I'm beginning to wonder? :huh: Eagle Dynamics Update – 03 May 2009 Golden Wounder no longer mate... Edited November 17, 2009 by joey45 The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
Vekkinho Posted November 17, 2009 Posted November 17, 2009 I take full credit. It's my 1.14 ranting that got us all past the requests for 1.13. Ed loved is so much they said "screw it, we'll call it 2.0". I told you all so! 2.0 is logic choice as it's more similar to DCS than LOFC 1.12. I remember few years back when we thought of LO:Black Shark 2.0! ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
TheMoose Posted December 26, 2009 Posted December 26, 2009 Not sure if that was asked, but here goes…Would it be possible in FC2, in multiplayer sessions if I kill a target that the same target remains destroyed if I have to respawn due that I get shot down? Regards, Antec 900 gaming tower, PSU: Corsair 750W, Q6600, Asus P5K, 8Gig Mushkin, Nvidia eVGA 280 GTX Superclocked 1G DDR3, SSDNOW200 Kingston Drive, TrackIr 3000+Vector, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro joystick, Saitek rudder pedals pro, Sharp 42" inch LCD Aquo. OS: windows 7 64bit.
theGozr Posted January 3, 2010 Posted January 3, 2010 (edited) 2.0 is logic choice as it's more similar to DCS than LOFC 1.12.Well not All aircraft will remain with the scripted SFM and S= Simplified! So basically we will have what we did already by mixing FC and DCS files together with some tweaks from the devs. Seriously we should complain about the lack of realism and work on cockpits and SFM instead of AFM ( A= Advance ).. Many went back to FC and got bored really quickly with Black Shark and the non existent adversary, So i think the sales are going down so why not making a FC 2.0 by making some minor tweaks that were suppose to be on an update like the 1.3 and sale it as FC 2.0 but by keeping the same crap FM planes .. The only worthy to fly is the Su25T and this is for Years now.. Just a disappointment!!! again.... Edited January 3, 2010 by theGozr 1 Fly it like you stole it..
Lucas_From_Hell Posted January 3, 2010 Posted January 3, 2010 theGozr, you're kidding me, right? Some people are unbelievable... Luckly, they aren't a majority here. If you want it, keep flying the Su-25T then. Most folks will be happy to get a lock on you with their same crap FM planes, be sure. Hopefully, ED ignores such trolls and knows that the rest of the community is thankful for their hard work. ED IS working on new cockpits, advanced flight models and etc., but one plane at a time. Some call it... DCS. Sounds familiar? I know your time is very very precious, and you can't miss your stupid NFL game or whatever while waiting for a new title, but while you're just complaining about someone else's hardwork, there's a whole team spread around Europe and U.S. that is sweating working on various projects simultaneously. You see, they are: Adapting Lock On to the DCS world Working on DCS:A-10C Working on diverse military projects I know your wishes are more important than anything in the world, but for heaven's sake, keep your useless opinion to you instead. Eagle Dynamics won't do porked 3D and AFM just to do so, that wouldn't be professional. Instead, they're modelling it with care, paying attention to every single rivet, modelling flight as it really should be. If you can't wait and think it's all horrible and etc., then go play FSX and, instead of killing planes, "kill time" as some genious put in this forum. If you don't want to fly those boilers, then be patient and wait. In Eagle Dynamics we trust 1
Recommended Posts