smithyc Posted October 17, 2007 Posted October 17, 2007 Hello. Would it be possible to play multiplayer cooperative as a pilot-copilot configuration in AH64-D model ? I hope so, otherwise you guys killed another good sim...:(
VMFA117_Poko Posted October 17, 2007 Posted October 17, 2007 I wouldn't be worry. It's only reasonable decision to do this.
Yellonet Posted October 17, 2007 Posted October 17, 2007 Hello. Would it be possible to play multiplayer cooperative as a pilot-copilot configuration in AH64-D model ? I hope so, otherwise you guys killed another good sim...:( What other sim did they kill? :noexpression: 1 i7-2600k@4GHz, 8GB, R9 280X 3GB, SSD, HOTAS WH, Pro Flight Combat Pedals, TIR5
Avimimus Posted October 17, 2007 Posted October 17, 2007 This paves the way for the Su-24 and the Mi-24 (although only one version could be modeled)
ZoomBoy27 Posted October 17, 2007 Posted October 17, 2007 What other sim did they kill? :noexpression: They killed my Lockheed Kitten-35 sim. It was purrty :P ZoomBoy My Flight Sims Page - Link to My Blog - Sims and Things - DCS Stuff++ - Up-to-Speed Guides to the old Lockon A10A and Su-25T - Some missions [needs update]
uksub Posted December 27, 2007 Posted December 27, 2007 From the FAQ: :smilewink: Not the Longbow but still great... Why not the Longbow? If you want a proper Study Sim it has to be the longbow no? It would be nice to have a decent complex Radar system to operate in a chopper.
Highwayman-Ed Posted December 27, 2007 Posted December 27, 2007 Hello. Would it be possible to play multiplayer cooperative as a pilot-copilot configuration in AH64-D model ? I hope so, otherwise you guys killed another good sim...:( And to kill the sim, they first have to make it... :huh: 1 Intel i9-9900KF @5.2GHz MSI Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon 32GB G.Skill Trident Z DDR3200 RAM MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio 40" Panasonic TH-40DX600U @ 4K Pimax Vision 8K Plus / Oculus Rift CV1 / HTC Vive Gametrix JetSeat with SimShaker Windows 10 64 Bit Home Edition [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
ED Team Groove Posted December 27, 2007 ED Team Posted December 27, 2007 Why not the Longbow? If you want a proper Study Sim it has to be the longbow no? It would be nice to have a decent complex Radar system to operate in a chopper. Hello uksub, a "proper study sim" needs proper data. So as soon as you can provide classified AH-64D data they will be more than glad to offer you a proper AH-64D study sim. As long as they dont have the accurate data we will have to fly the AH-64 which will be awesome too ;) Our Forum Rules: http://forums.eagle.ru/rules.php#en
CAT_101st Posted December 27, 2007 Posted December 27, 2007 As long as they make a AH-64 I will be happy. :pilotfly: Home built PC Win 10 Pro 64bit, MB ASUS Z170 WS, 6700K, EVGA 1080Ti Hybrid, 32GB DDR4 3200, Thermaltake 120x360 RAD, Custom built A-10C sim pit, TM WARTHOG HOTAS, Cougar MFD's, 3D printed UFC and Saitek rudders. HTC VIVE VR. https://digitalcombatmercenaries.enjin.com/
VS461 Posted December 27, 2007 Posted December 27, 2007 AH-64 Coop.... Mi-24 with dual cockpit in the future? It would be great! Nowadays' Mi-24D/Vs would be quite interesting in DCS. Track the target manually in the Raduga or with the KPS-53 gun sight... Crew's cooperation with the 1-2 secs delay of TeamSpeak... Handling the so-called "built-in" GPS Pilot III... or the DISS-15D... Mmmmm! After the digital wonders of Su-25T, A-10 and Ka-50...That would be VEEEERY nice. THX! За всю историю никто и никогда не сумел завоевать Афганистан. Hикто и никогда
Weta43 Posted December 27, 2007 Posted December 27, 2007 Crew's cooperation with the 1-2 secs delay of TeamSpeak E.D.'s said that they will attempt to integrate voice comms into the sim (with terrain blocking etc) in a future module - the AH-64 with dual cockpit co-op would be a good place to start (though so would the A-10 module, allowing retrofitting to the Ka-50 ..) Cheers.
Deigs Posted December 30, 2007 Posted December 30, 2007 Hello uksub, a "proper study sim" needs proper data. So as soon as you can provide classified AH-64D data they will be more than glad to offer you a proper AH-64D study sim. As long as they dont have the accurate data we will have to fly the AH-64 which will be awesome too ;) I think I asked something like uksub wrote a few weeks back, but when I sobered up I knew it wasn't possible. The great thing about Black Shark is the level of detail and realism in the systems and controls that the DCS lads are putting into it. That could never be reproduced for the AH64D because (like Groove pointed out originally) of it's classified nature. I would rather fly something that is as close to the real thing, then "we think the system, weapons, radar might do something like this?". Just the thought of having the AH 64A Apache (to be released 9 months after Black Shark) to the current level of the Ka 50 makes me count the remaining months. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 161 Squadron Australia's DCS Community
4c Hajduk Veljko Posted December 30, 2007 Posted December 30, 2007 E.D.'s said that they will attempt to integrate voice comms into the sim (with terrain blocking etc)People will just use Team Speak instead. I don't want to loose comms just because I am behind the hill. However, it would be nice to have comms with different channels for different purpose (approach, combat packages, ground markers ...). Thermaltake Kandalf LCS | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R | Etasis ET750 (850W Max) | i7-920 OC to 4.0 GHz | Gigabyte HD5850 | OCZ Gold 6GB DDR3 2000 | 2 X 30GB OCZ Vertex SSD in RAID 0 | ASUS VW266H 25.5" | LG Blue Ray 10X burner | TIR 5 | Saitek X-52 Pro | Logitech G930 | Saitek Pro flight rudder pedals | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
Weta43 Posted December 30, 2007 Posted December 30, 2007 People will just use Team Speak instead. I don't want to loose comms just because I am behind the hill. It might cut out when their is a hill in the way, but it would be instant, which has advantages. PS - do people think that by constantly saying the AH-64 will be next and not the A-10, they can make this come true, or are they just not reading what ED says and creating a self perpetuating rumour ? From the thread "New Interview with Jim Mackonochie from Simware 08" My mistake in the interview, it was a bit busy at the show! Next aircraft is planned to be A-10, not Apache. Cheers.
predaeus Posted December 30, 2007 Posted December 30, 2007 I think they say that from the point of view of a helicopter driver. So I would also talk like that :-D
Eagle Driver Posted December 30, 2007 Posted December 30, 2007 IMO, it makes more sense to release the Apache first as it would pair up the two choppers an make room for fixed-wing jets. This is probably why most people thing this way, because it is the option that makes logical sense. Now, there's obviously something that ED knows that makes the A-10 work better, and I'm fine with that becaue I personally like the A-10 a lot and can't wait to get my paws on it. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] If you fly a perfect Defensive BFM and the bandit does a perfect Offensive... Someone you know is going to be recieving Insurance money very soon.
britgliderpilot Posted December 30, 2007 Posted December 30, 2007 IMO, it makes more sense to release the Apache first as it would pair up the two choppers an make room for fixed-wing jets. This is probably why most people thing this way, because it is the option that makes logical sense. Now, there's obviously something that ED knows that makes the A-10 work better, and I'm fine with that becaue I personally like the A-10 a lot and can't wait to get my paws on it. Simple guess? Modelling the A-10 first gives them more time to work on the dual-control code. That's going to an interesting challenge . . . http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v121/britgliderpilot/BS2Britgliderpilot-1.jpg
CAT_101st Posted December 30, 2007 Posted December 30, 2007 Simple guess? Modelling the A-10 first gives them more time to work on the dual-control code. That's going to an interesting challenge . . . Or they ar already working on somthing for real pilots to train with and it just happens to be the A-10. Home built PC Win 10 Pro 64bit, MB ASUS Z170 WS, 6700K, EVGA 1080Ti Hybrid, 32GB DDR4 3200, Thermaltake 120x360 RAD, Custom built A-10C sim pit, TM WARTHOG HOTAS, Cougar MFD's, 3D printed UFC and Saitek rudders. HTC VIVE VR. https://digitalcombatmercenaries.enjin.com/
ED Team Wags Posted December 30, 2007 ED Team Posted December 30, 2007 Simple guess? Modelling the A-10 first gives them more time to work on the dual-control code. That's going to an interesting challenge . . . Actually, more simple than that: the A-10A is simply much further along in development due to number of factors over the past year. Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/wagmatt Twitch: wagmatt System: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3729544#post3729544
rogue_blade Posted December 30, 2007 Posted December 30, 2007 why the f wont we get the a10c and the ah64d [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
DarkStar Posted December 30, 2007 Posted December 30, 2007 Hello uksub, a "proper study sim" needs proper data. So as soon as you can provide classified AH-64D data they will be more than glad to offer you a proper AH-64D study sim. As long as they dont have the accurate data we will have to fly the AH-64 which will be awesome too ;) That's why
CAT_101st Posted December 30, 2007 Posted December 30, 2007 To due a true study sim they need all the info on each. I am sure that their is sone classified info on each to prevent a true representation of each. Thats just my 2 cents. Home built PC Win 10 Pro 64bit, MB ASUS Z170 WS, 6700K, EVGA 1080Ti Hybrid, 32GB DDR4 3200, Thermaltake 120x360 RAD, Custom built A-10C sim pit, TM WARTHOG HOTAS, Cougar MFD's, 3D printed UFC and Saitek rudders. HTC VIVE VR. https://digitalcombatmercenaries.enjin.com/
Weta43 Posted December 31, 2007 Posted December 31, 2007 IMO, it makes more sense to release the Apache first as it would pair up the two choppers and make room for fixed-wing jets. At some levels I agree with you, but there are a couple of things that probably make the A-10 more sense. 1/ The A-10 doesn't need any new technology - they have the AFM developed from FC, the system modelling developed from BS, WAFM for A2G & ballistics from BS. No 2 person online co-op/Dual control code needed etc. 2/ It gets a fixed wing air craft into the DCS lineup ASAP to catch all those who have no interest in a hellicopter sim (drag more of the LOFC crew across). 3/ It gets something from the US into the DCS lineup ASAP, to catch those who have no interest in flying anything not made in the USA (drag more of the LOFC crew across). 4/ Or they (have) already (been) working on somthing for real pilots to train with and it just happens to be the A-10. posted from page 2 of a 3 page thread :-) Cheers.
VMFA117_Poko Posted December 31, 2007 Posted December 31, 2007 (...) 2/ It gets a fixed wing air craft into the DCS lineup ASAP to catch all those who have no interest in a hellicopter sim (drag more of the LOFC crew across). 3/ It gets something from the US into the DCS lineup ASAP, to catch those who have no interest in flying anything not made in the USA (drag more of the LOFC crew across). (...)Weta is right but i think ED does exacly same way now.
uksub Posted December 31, 2007 Posted December 31, 2007 Hello uksub, a "proper study sim" needs proper data. So as soon as you can provide classified AH-64D data they will be more than glad to offer you a proper AH-64D study sim. As long as they dont have the accurate data we will have to fly the AH-64 which will be awesome too ;) Fair play. Cant blame a guy for wishing can you? Looking forward to the AH-64 anyway. Cheers
Recommended Posts