Jump to content

First fighter to be added to DCS: Black Shark?


Alexrey

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah no A-A in DCS :D

 

DCS:Tu-160 !

 

Exactly!

 

DCS: Tu-95, DCS: B2, DCS: Strela-10, BUK :P

 

We all having fun :D Good from time to time laugh ;)

Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D

ಠ_ಠ



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here an Idea guys, and I am fully aware that it will not happen. How about late 70 to early 80 aircraft. 1975 to 1985. Man, we would have such a rich variety. Fom F-4 to Mig-21. Hell, some countries still flew century aircraft like the F-104, F-100, real aircraft that required real pilots. Mirage III, Mirage 5, JAS-35, A-4, A-6, A-7, Mig-19, etc, etc. Talking about complexity, aircraft like the F-4, the Buccaneer, F-14 would not even be able to fly without a WSO. The start would be 5 times more complex and harder to understand with no internal starting systems. You guys imagine taking off on a UH-1 fully loaded with no computer assistence in any way? Pushing the throttles on a F-111 to go to faster at 50 meters off the gound. Man that would be awesome to me anyway.... :cry:

Now that is out of my chest I will move on to reality and wait for the next module with great hope and expectations. :joystick: What ever aircraft that may be.

To whom it may concern,

I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that.

Thank you for you patience.

 

 

Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would take anything if it would mean landing on a carrier. A2A, A2G, it makes no difference. Gimme some carrier ops and I'll be one happy camper. (A-6 would rawk)

 

I am with you on this one, brother!!! Could not have said it better myself! Only difference would be F/A-18 (Super) Hornet would be my choice over the A-6...not too familiar with that plane, though I'd still use it for carrier ops!

 

(I use to like flying the F-22 Raptor from a carrier in JetFighter III, not an official sim; but boy were those carrier ops awesome!)

 

(Actually, while thinking about it, there was a game put out by EA those many years ago, I don't remember the exact name, but it might have been F/A-18. I played it for hours and hours on my Commodore Amiga, that was my first experience with any type of fighter game...then moved on to simulations in the 90's, but those Amiga days still bring back fond memories with that game)


Edited by Sunjah

Remember, on Nov. 4th, vote for Black Shark for President!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DCS "A2A" will be a very very painful experience.

 

... and I'm a sado-masochist ... probably leaning to being more of a masochist :D

 

Cheers!

Teapot

"A true 'sandbox flight sim' requires hi-fidelity flyable non-combat utility/support aircraft."

Wishlist Terrains - Bigger maps

Wishlist Modules - A variety of utility aircraft to better reflect the support role. E.g. Flying the Hornet ... big yawn ... flying a Caribou on a beer run to Singapore? Count me in. Extracting a Recon Patrol from a hastily prepared landing strip at a random 6 figure grid reference? Now yer talking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets be fair - no a2a ! :D

 

DCS:Tu-160 !

 

 

"DCS Automatic Mission Rotator: 10 Minutes Left in mission"

 

OHHH NO! I've been flying for 8 hours and still haven't reached my target!!!!!!!!

 

YAWN!

 

:D

 

Might as well call it DCS:Surfing Porn, 'cause what the hell else ya gonna do with a 14+ hour hop?

 

Alt+Tab is gonna come in 'handy', brotha!

The code is probaly in Russian anyway.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DCS viper pilot says : *Well i need to move my ministick and hit the TMS up to lock the target. then I fire*.

 

DCS mig29A pilot says : *well i have to flip these 10 switches to get into a scan mode where I have a chance of finding him... Then of course if I lose the lock I must realign them all again ...* or something like this

 

DCS ka50 pilot says : *What the ... just happened?* - killed by r77

 

DCS f-15 pilot says : *Maddog, maddog, maddog.....ARRRRR what just happened, i used 3 amraams they said

they would be better than lockon!* - ate an archer

 

rofl..... :lol:

 

Mig-29 says: ...... i have 45° off bore sight shot....but where the heck...no that didnt work...:megalol:

Mig-29 says: ....hmm what did my instructor meant with i "turn" better then the viper boys...... :huh:

Mig-29 says: ...oh wow...he dropped all his tanks...why i cant do so funny stuff..

new DCS pilot says: ..where my speed gone :helpsmilie::music_whistling:

old Lockon pilot says: ...scew it...thats not fun..i cant dodge missiles anymore :D

..hill-monkeys say: hmm ?


Edited by A.S

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how people here are debating over... "national" stuff.

 

I guess, being greek, I shouldn't ask for more than what we already have: Falcon 4.0

 

However, following the tide:

 

1) I demand that we only get the AH-64A, which we are going to anyway, because that's what my country is using. No D whatsoever, sorry.(n itz eeez lol)

 

2) I also demand that the Mirage2000 present in lockon is promptly upgraded and incorporateded to the -9 standard, coz we also have it here. And with fully clickable cockpit pls. kthx. (n i knowsome d00d who makez som cockpitz n stuff 4 it)

 

3) I want full ASW* modelled. I want the 212, SeaKnight andwhatshit: want some non-coaxial shit coz I paid 4 my pedals, ya know? kthx

 

Moar will come.

 

P.S: I do want the Raphale

P.S.S: Nay, I *demand* it

 

 

 

*don't try this at home kids

 

Edit: forgor an awesome fighter-bomber (jabo for you IL-2 freaks) that I see on parades: A-7H Corsair II. We have it (we do!). You make it. It's thirdwire bonanza all over again. Yeah baby


Edited by lamarax
Edit2: shit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how people here are debating over... "national" stuff.

 

I guess, being greek, I shouldn't ask for more than what we already have: Falcon 4.0

 

However, following the tide:

 

1) I demand that we only get the AH-64A, which we are going to anyway, because that's what my country is using. No D whatsoever, sorry.(n itz eeez lol)

 

2) I also demand that the Mirage2000 present in lockon is promptly upgraded and incorporateded to the -9 standard, coz we also have it here. And with fully clickable cockpit pls. kthx. (n i knowsome d00d who makez som cockpitz n stuff 4 it)

 

3) I want full ASW* modelled. I want the 212, SeaKnight andwhatshit: want some non-coaxial shit coz I paid 4 my pedals, ya know? kthx

 

Moar will come.

 

P.S: I do want the Raphale

P.S.S: Nay, I *demand* it

 

 

 

*don't try this at home kids

 

Edit: forgor an awesome fighter-bomber (jabo for you IL-2 freaks) that I see on parades: A-7H Corsair II. We have it (we do!). You make it. It's thirdwire bonanza all over again. Yeah baby

if your refering to me, im not debating, and im not demanding, im just saying it would be nice to see some flyable british plane in this game, To me it would make a change, after all lockon, was russian american based aircraft, and DCS is the same.... End off

Tbone:thumbup::pilotfly::joystick::cry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i remeber many years ago when lockon was released there was evidence of some testing of the harrier jet in lockon, if i remeber rightly there were some residual files left over in the release build or somthing along those lines. Correct me if im wrong ofcourse... Harrier FTW !

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if your refering to me, im not debating, and im not demanding, im just saying it would be nice to see some flyable british plane in this game, To me it would make a change, after all lockon, was russian american based aircraft, and DCS is the same.... End off

Tbone:thumbup::pilotfly::joystick::cry:

 

Dear T.Bone, I wasn't refering to you in particular, although you gave me the incentive.

 

Take my post as a parody of a general mentality if you will; a comment on these futile discussions, when ED has clearly stated that what they are going to model, depends on their 'other' contracts and available information.

 

I was delighted when I first got my hands on Flanker 2.0, because, you know, this offered me a fresh insight into modern air combat on our limited medium, regardless if I have never seen a russian ship in my whole life.

 

Plus, I'm a commie bastard deep inside :p. So,there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would be really, really, REALLY interesting is if during air to air missions online, real-life control limitations are enforced.

 

Guess what that means? No HOTAS for the MiG-29 and Su-27. Or, you get a "HOTAS", but not in the same regard as the F-16 and F-15. Wanna schlemm? You gotta flick the switch on the dash board, aka keyboard. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...