Qcumber Posted January 16 Posted January 16 2 minutes ago, Silver_Dragon said: waiting about the roadmap newsletter to some info about WW2..... Yes. Where is WW2 stuff? 5 9800x3d: rtx4070: 64Gb: 2Tb NVME: Rift S: Quest Pro
Beirut Posted January 16 Posted January 16 What about my passion? What about my support? What da dilli-o- daddy-o? 4 Some of the planes, but all of the maps!
JD Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Just now, TheFreshPrince said: I'm also wondering why there is no mentioning of Vulcan anymore after it has been praised for years. Did they give up on that? how they can show it in video? Tomorrow there will be (should be, at least) a huge newsletter with some explanations and plans for the future, hope to see release windows for 130, DC, Vulkan, 4C and Typhoon 1 minute ago, Beirut said: What about my passion? What about my support? What da dilli-o- daddy-o? honestly, that was one of the main things in "20XX and beyond". Passion and Support always made me feel proud 1
Bucic Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Quote -I have a bad feeling about the F35. It is Pandora's box of problems with the lack of data, and also glass cockpits are boring. All glass cockpit modules are Pandora's boxers... Quote -No "Hi, this is Nick from ED..." -The music was not epic enough and came too late. My highlights of the 2025: - F-5E remastered, - fog, - AH-64 rotor animation and audio - new standard for pilot/cockpit immersion 1 F-5E simpit cockpit dimensions and flight controls Kill the Bloom - shader glow mod Poor audio Doppler effect in DCS [bug] Trees - huge performance hit especially up close
Ghost79 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 15 minutes ago, Sunbather said: I am still wondering what those palm trees were all about. I didn't really see any Vietnam or Marianias Pacific WW2 action. I'm wondering if this is actually Caucasus 2.0. The first part of the Video showcased the dynamic campaign over Georgia, the palm trees featured around this point too. And... if you go onto google maps and look at say downtown Poti on street view, you can see plenty of palm trees. Just my theory. 2 Youtube channel @Flightenvy680
Beirut Posted January 16 Posted January 16 6 minutes ago, JD said: honestly, that was one of the main things in "20XX and beyond". Passion and Support always made me feel proud We've been downgraded. 2 Some of the planes, but all of the maps!
Silver_Dragon Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I think the night images, with better lights, fog, clouds, etc, will be Vulkan. 4 For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
St4rgun Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Silver_Dragon said: I think the night images, with better lights, fog, clouds, etc, will be Vulkan. I watched a lot of ED's videos in the past years, but the sheer quality of this first part is breathtaking. The motion, the lights, the crisp details... Sometimes I genuinely tought it's real world footage it's so good. Hats off ED. We're eagerly waiting for the newsletter. Edited January 16 by St4rgun 7 PC: 14700K | Gigabyte Z790 | Palit 3090 GamingPro | 32GB | Win10 Pro HMD: HP Reverb G2 | OpenXR @ 150% | DCS 2.9: PD: 1.0, DLSS 4 Profile "K" / "Performance" with Sharpening 1 Controllers: VKB Gunfighter MkIII base & 200 mm curved extension center mounted + TM F16 Grip / MCG Pro Grip | TM TFRP
gunterlund Posted January 16 Posted January 16 23 minutes ago, Aja said: My feelings about the video: -No "Hi, this is Nick from ED..." -The music was not epic enough and came too late. -I have a bad feeling about the F35. It is Pandora's box of problems with the lack of data, and also glass cockpits are boring. -The next F-15 full fidelity model without resolving the Razban situation is salt in the wound. +-The level of detail of infantry seems to be a waste of resources, I would prefer adding better movement animation for current models. +The German map looks to be nice, ideal for helicopter player +The C-130 is still in the work, I am looking for that module. +Alternative HUD for F-14, it is always good to have the option to choose. +-It would be funny if the first full-fidelity ground vehicle was the T-34-85 +Dynamic campaign will be nice. And if it is also connected with AI to voice narrate some in-game radio text or even the auto-generated briefing, it would be better. I hope that with the dynamic campaign, they will brink the save-load function into the DCS. I think having Nick on there would have started a riot... Just sayin'. 4
Zebra1-1 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 6 minutes ago, Silver_Dragon said: I think the night images, with better lights, fog, clouds, etc, will be Vulkan. That crossed my mind too. Was hoping it would be mentioned in the credits. Fingers crossed. 1
macedk Posted January 16 Posted January 16 5 minutes ago, St4rgun said: I watched a lot of ED's videos in the past years, but the sheer quality of this first part is breathtaking. The motion, the lights, the crisp details... Sometimes I genuinely tought it's real world footage it's so good. Hats off ED. We're eagerly waiting for the newsletter. GA is very very good 2 OS: Win10 home 64bit*MB: Asus Strix Z270F/ CPU: Intel I7 7700k /Ram:32gb_ddr4 GFX: Nvidia Asus 1080 8Gb Mon: Asus vg2448qe 24" Disk: SSD Stick: TM Warthog #1400/Saitek pro pedals/TIR5/TM MFDs [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
toni Posted January 16 Posted January 16 So, for the next 2026 and beyond......Southeast Asia map + a F-105 module ? 5
Silver_Dragon Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Qcumber said: Yes. Where is WW2 stuff? F6F, F4U and Zero (starting to think, that will be a module on the future) appears, but not other PTO stuff (Carriers, tanks, etc)..... Marianas WW2 appears on some shots. And of course, a T-34 ETO incoming? Other module missing has be the La-7. Edited January 16 by Silver_Dragon 3 For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
MAXsenna Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Shame, I would prefer the F-22A moreBut imagine how easy it will be to make a simpit. Just purchase a huge secondary touch screen, and you're good to to. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk 2
T.Power Posted January 16 Posted January 16 47 minutes ago, Canada_Moose said: its NOT an F22 look at the intake and the nose profile It even has the F35A shoulder hump for the gun. Yup I see the F-35A in the module list, it just didn't look chubby enough in the video, meh, not interested anyway. “War is nothing but a continuation of politics with the admixture of other means.” ― Carl von Clausewitz, On War
Bikerguy302000 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 36 minutes ago, TheFreshPrince said: I'm also wondering why there is no mentioning of Vulcan anymore after it has been praised for years. Did they give up on that? Not sure how they would mention it in what is just a cinematic video without narration.
T.Power Posted January 16 Posted January 16 55 minutes ago, Punkmonkey22 said: It's the F-35A, there's a sub forum for it now with a Q & A Yeh I found it, this has to be the single most pointless module ED has ever committed to, hence my disbelief, oh well. 3 “War is nothing but a continuation of politics with the admixture of other means.” ― Carl von Clausewitz, On War
bfr Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) I can't help but think they've made a huge rod for their own back now that the standard 'do you have declassified docs for that?' reply to amendments/upgrade requests to existing jets holds no water. If they were going to do a stealth platform and were relaxing the stance on 'we need the docs' that surprised they didn't have a tilt at the F-117 first. I know it featured fleetingly in the video but I assume from us having an F35A sub-forum within minutes but not an F-117 that its not a module actively in the works. Plus it'd probably feel much less out of place/time in the wider game than the F-35. The Germany map looks pretty mega from what they showed, and i've been looking forward to see what the Typhoon ends up like for a while. Also kind of curious about the Herc when it materialises. I'm not going to lie, i'd much rather have a finished Strike Eagle than the F-15C. On that note, I hope the complete absence of RB jets in this years video isn't a sign that the conclusion of that spat isn't going to be a positive one. 7 minutes ago, Jayhawk1971 said: No AI A-6? Its gone awfully quiet on the A-7 front too. Edited January 16 by bfr 5 3
pjbunnyru Posted January 16 Posted January 16 45 минут назад, JD сказал: can you provide a text plese? (in russian if possible) im under verification of all my messages. even if I do not agree with u, i will not be able to object 2 u. нахожусь под проверкой всех моих сообщений. даже если я не согласен с тобой, то не смогу тебе возразить.
wilbur81 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) SO pleased to see the visible progress on the Dynamic Campaign front! Well done, ED Team! Edited January 16 by wilbur81 2 i7 8700K @ Stock - Win10 64 - 32 RAM - RTX 3080 12gb OC - 55 inch 4k Display
MAXsenna Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) 24 minutes ago, bfr said: If they were going to do a stealth platform and were relaxing the stance on 'we need the docs' that surprised they didn't have a tilt at the F-117 first. Rumor has it FF F-117 is coming from a 3rd party. Have heard that rumour before, while I don't remember where and when by whom. Edited January 16 by MAXsenna 177 -> 117 1
bies Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) I absolutely love the full fidelity F-15C, but when it comes to the F-35 so many questions come to mind: No DCS module used AESA radar before No DCS module used stealth before Real F-35 avionics alghoritms, EW, sensors integration, weapon systems, radar modes, all the software etc. has probably more lines of code then whole DCS (!) - how to code such thing, even assuming access to full documentation? It's cutting edge technology and one of NATO's trum cards just barely starting to enter service - let's be honest, it's just strictly classified... Maybe ED has received contract from the military, as 1100 F-35 has already been produced, to make a training tool for the USAF/NATO and they came to conclusion they can make it to the commercial public DCS is some shape or form? Or maybe it's better to wait for ED's take on the F-35 before speculating too much. Edited January 16 by bies 2
Recommended Posts