All Activity

patience.

Your characterization here is not accurate.

Fitted? Sure, the lugs should be the same, and likely the data cable and fuzing lanyards too. Actually useable? That's where it could be debatable. The Stores Management System won't have a weapon code for it on the Weapon Insertion Panel. No code entered means no option on the STORES page wingform.

ED has the "timeframe" standard. We can all argue about that standard for as long we want. But that's what it is. To that standard, the GBU-54 did not even exist within that date and wasnt introduced onto the legacy hornets till 2012. This is a pretty cut and dry discussion. I don't understand why this keeps coming up.

I know that, but there's this bug or quirk where the radar will have a target somehow and you have to select that screen and hit the unlock button (backspace).

I really like the Dora too. Initially I was a little disappointed in my combat results,until I heard Greg say(pretty sure it was Greg) that if you're in the Dora,you have no business trying to turn fight most fighters.The P47 is fair game though. And the key to the Dora,for me, is to keep your speed high and quit pulling back on the stick.It will fly beautifully.

Forgot to mention it seems a per usual with the AGM65H.

This issue just recently popped up for me also. I have had this AGM65D mission I created several years ago to brush up before a mission since I don't get to fly everyday. I don't have any SS's from previous but I did run this practice mission earlier this month as well as others and all was as usual. Yesterday I pulled a mission up and right away noticed the blurry AGM camera, more so than usual. So I pulled up my practice mission and same thing. Checked all my settings which had not been changed. Did a full repair, no change. I do not have any mods at all. Frame rates are all still good as you can see from these attached screen shots, just a more blurry camera now. I see there was some tweaks to the AGM65 in the last update and I had not used them since before then.

Then what is your question? You say something about fire or guide in SNP 2 is wrong but you also mention radar is in STT?

Where did I say "its a less important thing"? The programmers can't do two things at once. Especially since the engine modeling and WEP are very laborious. The list is simply a "note" that we are aware of problems. Not the status of when the problem will be fixed, sorry.

First, adding a GBU-54 to the F/A-18C wouldn't be dragging into infinity since and afterall the GBU-54 and its functionalities are already modeled thanks to A-10C2. And regarding your points: 1) Perhaps having modeled a 2012 F-18 would have been better in order to go along with for the example A-10C2 which you mentioned. But on the other hand, there's probably not much diference between a 2005 F/A-18C and a 2012 one, this apart from very small diferences such as carrying GBU-54 which is what's being requested here. 2) I fully and totally disagree with you and I can't see the logic of that reasoning of yours. There's nothing that prevents a 2005 F/A-18 to be fitted in 2012 with a GBU-54. At the same time there's no way on Earth that a 2005 F/A-18 could go back to 1989 (unless someone invents Time Travel!) 3) This argument isn't nearly bad as the ones you gave ("If you want the GBU-54, just get the A-10C2". "If you want the GBU-54 on the F-18, just play a different game"), not even by a long shot! My argument doesn't force you to play like I would like to but your argument forces me to play like you want to. Get the diference? Besides, if I wanted to use the GBU-54 with the A-10C2, I wouldn't be here in this part of the forum (DCS F/A-18)!

It’s based on the SM Avionics manual which is later 2000s. Our F-16 is based on the October 2007 TO 1F-16CM

I did see a small decrease in CPU frametime (about 3%) which could be within the margin of error but as far as quality, very diffcult to assess. There is still some smearing and it seems less than previously but very hard to measure.

Je recommande à tout le monde le site web DCSmiz.cn ! Il peut compiler directement les fichiers miz des missions de DCS en français – c’est génial ! En plus, il peut même compiler directement les dossiers de campagnes, trop cool !

My choices (of the above choices) are: Chinese Aerobatics Team / Vietnam Camo 2072 / Vietnam BM 2047 / Czech MiG-17 "Red" / Indonesian Aerobatic Team Red / Egyptian Nile Valley Camo / United Arab Republic / US "Have Drill" Camo / Randy Ball 1611

Probably nothing. Im new to the whole DFR and pimax thing. Ive found all versions to have some serious issue. I cant get consistent results from anything yet and I cant figure out how to replicate or reproduce problems or stop them lol. with PP latest 1.41.2 I did get it to run at 75 to 90 fps several times but its also crashing still and sometimes will revert back to running at only 35fps. It all seems highly correlated to mbucchas quadviews its complex... lots of combos.

Thank you so much - I will run this and report back! Thank you again!

I upgraded to the latest version of Pimax SW and noticed a considerable hit on my FPS. I have an OG crystal. In the new SW under the DFR section when I set the RR to 100% in the gaze section and 5% in the prereferral section my FPS settles in at 55. If I downgrade my SW 1.39 or 1.40 and I use Mbucchas QV and the QV companion tool and turn off QV in the Pimax SW, I can crank my RR up to 200% and maintain a nice 72FPS. What am I doing wrong? I have not adjusted any other settings other than the DFR settings between the old SW and the new SW.

Sorry! Thank you so much!!!!!!

You have to steer with differential braking, the front wheel just casters. If both brakes were to be controlled by a single control, how would you do differential braking? I binded two axes, one for each wheelbrake.

I didn't say that, but anyone that keeps asking for more things instead of enjoying what we already have been given, does come across as a bit ungrateful.