All Activity

Thanks for the replies now I understand

I haven't jumped into the CH-47 yet, but it's working great in the apache. I'm currently fiddling around with the extra command lines to see if I can get the fuel state visible from the EUFD. If that's available? Great work BTW I'm absolutely loving it.

This was, as I orbited around 5/7 miles from the outpost. Another great campaign,so rewarding when see Unfortunately there're this negative result in M10 Part 1...oh well.I'm quite happy to have bought and played this ( and the Hornet's) Campaign. Thank you Sir

Thanks for the feedback mate. I think I'll make my own and use hamsters and hares. The animal feed will probably bee cheaper.

France stepping up its air capabilities with this upgrade definitely shows how AESA tech is becoming a standard across modern fighters. Excited to see how this influences future deployments.

Fair shout - here´s more videos and shots from those vids - as one can clearly see ( no pun intended) the contrast difference is huge, and that's at around 12nm in couple of those shots in NON XR. Its as if our TGP has a layer of grease covering the lens.

На 92-м году жизни умер авиаконструктор, создатель штурмовика Су-25 и первый главный конструктор пассажирского самолета SSJ100 Юрий Ивашечкин. https://www.forbes.ru/society/545181-umer-sozdatel-sturmovika-su-25-i-pervyj-glavnyj-konstruktor-ssj100-urij-ivaseckin

I agree. It's a shame that adding an EWR to the group won't change a thing in vanilla DCS. Regardless, the higher detection range in a ~50° sector is nonsensical.

Hot air tube for windshield ventilation

Monopoly, unfortunately, is the key here. ED knows there is little if no alternative. I too think there's room for improvement especially if they commit themselves in specialized advance modules. Speaking out matters but ED should respond if they care

or at least the ability for the users to add points and routs by their own. Think here are enough people willing to do the job.

Terrain teams do not work on modules. thank you

I would pause the new dev and update what you have to adequacy, then turn new dev back on. ED may have over committed with f-35, Iraq, Fulcrum and others.

Unfortunately you cannot display them in the mission editor. Only on the F10 Map in the game. Displaying Fixes and Waypoints in the ME is a huge wish!

Так точно)

Has anyone got the last version that was released of the Eurofighter - 1.1?

Sounds logical.

The map is feature complete, meaning it has met all the planned additions and features. Anything new would be new; it doesn't mean it's "missing" anything based on the original plan. I think many of us at ED would like this as well, its just a matter of dev time and a balance of new maps vs updating old ones. But its on our minds.

Please tell us how is that related to PG as there are so many missing airports and I already asked about a specific one farther south on the map! No name, no ATC is like the development stopped mid work and no update came along. thanks We also remember that there are tools to provide a map of entire world for the size lesser than than 100GB but will never see it here, aren't we?

Before eveyroje gets their pitchforks and torches out, here me out! I know most people don't like monthly subscriptions but in my opinion the model of it sort of fits in DCS. If a weekly/monthly subscription model for both aircraft and maps were to be implemented it would sit between a full purchase of an individual module and the 2 week trial feature. Pricing obviously should be less than what an actual module costs. I'd love to hear everyone's opinions, both positive and negative which I'm expecting there'll be a decent amount. Try to keep them civil and any counter points should be constructive.

Because, for example, MiG-29S is one of the most dangerous in visual range. In my BFM experience against it. Then again, there is no ultimate aircraft. Each excelling in certain areas and outcome mostly depends on situation.

Guys, It is not 2017 anymore, we now have Cold War, Afganistan, Iraq, Kola, South Atlantic, Syria To pull together the nav data for each of these is a day's work and publically available for it to be entered into a data file. Can we explain why the NS430 is not being supported with "new" map data. It has to be said the current lack of navigation as a critical process in flight simulation, is very much out of focus within both the mission editor and F10 map. All the normal routes, low and hi, intersections points and beacons, sid/stars should be present for each map. This adds in additional importance when you consider the upcoming c130 release. Please can one of the team get this in order and updated. Even a base standard would be a start, i dont think anyone is asking for a monthly AIRAC cycle but a base requirement is going to be required. Also as a heads up the C130j has the potential to pull over a new crowd into DCS, but you never get a second chance to make a first impression and as such the nav modules and presentaton within DCS needs dramatically improving, and its not complex surely?

@-Rudel- Poke

ED has still not provided bindings for a 3-position A/P Pitch switch. I added this myself into the LUA file. If you don't want to make the LUA edit, you need to use the pushbutton bindings. You may have missed one of the necessary bindings. Can you post a screen shot of your bindings?

BVR down to WVR. Cannot be treated in isolation when inserted in a context of a mission.