All Activity

you'll have to ask Gloria for it. I don't have the manual where it is

Have you tried these 2 liveries on user files? https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3321599/ https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3322190/

I'd love to have the 493rd's last eagle in Europe!

Observed as well

Yes, already fixed internally, thanks!

Just realised that there's already a wishlist item about the same topic. Sorry. Mods, feel free to merge.

Hello, These hangs occur when you use a Static Template that employs units from a User Mod, but you don't have that Mod loaded. For example, kirkenes has this warning on its file description: Static template for Kirkenes Airport for the Kola map. Required mods: - SAM Sites Asset Pack Beta 1.9 https://forum.dcs.world/topic/275571-sam-sites-asset-pack-a-3d-assets-mod-to-populate-you-sam-sites-farp-and-other-bases/ - VPC - AIRFIELD EQUIPMENT FOR DCS WORLD v0.9.6 https://forum.dcs.world/topic/211575-vpc-airfield-equipment-094-beta/ - CAP – Vehicles v1.0 https://forum.dcs.world/topic/270558-civilian-objects-and-vehicles/ - Civil Aircraft Mod V0.87 https://forum.dcs.world/topic/339882-civil-aircraft-mod-cam/ You need to have those user mods loaded on your DCS in order to be able to load the Static Template properly.

I would like to add the following thread into the wish list section since it is more or less and no harm at all: Please let me know if any suggestion.

Just one thing to note when looking at the store page for the NS430: - The device supports navigation on next maps: Caucasus, Nevada, Normandy 1944 and Persian Gulf And there are evidently no plans yet to extend the map support

In the navigation training mission I switched hud mode from from день (day) to сетка and back to день. And the day mode became just the same as night (ночь) mode

Hi, I am unable to hear the awacs answer. What am i doing wrong? I set the switches in the "on" position, turned the channel knob but...i hear nothing Help needed thx

The only way I can get decent results is with high supersampling. I have started using MSAA x2 with QVFR. Set VD to Godlike with 150% in the slider. Then set the peripheral resolution to 0.33. I get good aircraft sporting and only a slight flickering. Overall it's a better experience for Warbirds.

Hi! Has anyone else been experiencing stutters when the sniper pod renders an XR image, after the last hotfix update? I’ve done a slow repair to no avail. Any suggestions? Thank you

Comm shouldn't work on a military aircraft. Remember, the GPS offers non-encoded transmission, which isn't ideal for a military force to be using. Basic navigation, coordinate verification, altering of flight plans, extended flight plans (more waypoints than what the onboard INS can handle/was designed for (6 maximum)), SA (have a basic map with airports/VOR and other points of interest mapped, an additional (and reliable) navigation aid, +++. It's actually quite a lot, depending on how creative you are, and how realistic you wish to go.

This has been an off and on issue for many years espeically with the normal antiship harpoons where they will just go off in completely different directions between clients or client-server. We've stopped using them in vCSG-3 at this point because of it.

When AUTO INT is turned off interrogations will only be run on the L&S automatically. But if you're setting the friendly as L&S them there may be an issue with outside of STT. Will do my own testing. I do have to ask tho, are you playing with Link-16 not turned on? This would be the only time a problem like this would turn up for friendly aircraft that i see.

My pleasure!

I know, but so far the mig29 is flying as intended. I remember watching a documentary about dogfights during Desert Storm, that either Captain Cesar Rodriguez or Captain Craig Underhill said that they were always told not to engage in a dogfight with a MIG-29. So far, the F-4s I've encountered at close range haven't had a chance to escape!

You're awesome someone! [emoji1] [emoji1303] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

I'm aware, but there is no ETA.

Wrong in all aspects. Those nations have a different approach to the resolution of aerial combat. IF, we consider all aspects in each given system, then the following applies: - The radar capability between F-15A and Su-27 are somewhat mixed. F-15A has more modes, and they somewhat more advanced digital suite, whereas Su-27 has the sheer size and power. This is actually a very nuanced topic, as it all depends and what conditions the radars operate in (ECM, range, altitude, meteorological conditions (wet/rain, clouds, etc...)). This topic is too expansive to be written about in a couple of sentences. It is widely regarded, and rightfully so, that the aircraft had very simmilar, yet different capabilites. The difference lie in the approach. What you fail, however to understand, is that Flanker/Fulcrum (and going all the way back to pre- MiG-21/Su-7, the Soviets "demanded" reliance on GCI for better strategic picture. As such, the Su-27 had datalink, when the F-15A (even C) had none. Question about radar - Soviets relied on GCI and AWACS heavily, that was before US really got into AWACS as a support element, properly. Hence, when you compare Su-27/MiG-29 to whatever, it is both what is on the aircraft, as well the GCI supporting the aircraft (they can tell the pilot when missiles are launched, what maneuvers to make in different situations and guide the missiles for the fighter, +++). US aircraft simply don't have those capabilities at the time we are talking about. - Relating to the above, SA is the whole situational awarness picture, not only what your radar shows. Tell me, who has hypothetically the better SA; the US pilot with his radar/RWR, or the Soviet pilot with radar/RWR/GCI/datalink?! This answers itself... It's often not taught of, but with a competent GCI, the western pilot would go up against two (pilot + dedicated GCI operator), and that's two heads vs. one. That alone, should put one on edge. - Again, you write in too broad terms. What specific AIM-7? What specific R-27? In history, there is always a cat and mouse game with whoever has the newest tech, is the king only until someone else develops something better. If you wish to be objective, then you won't chose to mention F-16 until it got BVR missiles, as before that, it was the underdog in just about every way to the MiG-29 (e.g.). Forgetting even the (often stupid) notion of dogfight. In real combat, if doctrine would be followed on both sides, F-15 would meet both Su-27s as well as MiG-25s. MiG-25's dynamic field of interception and missiles (R-40R/T) would pose serious problems for F-15s. I'm not even counting the different ground installations (AAA/SAM) which would plague both sides.

Thank you for this even more in-depth reply!

I would love such a feature. For me personally it would be sufficient if the implementation would be "gamified" to some degree. For example with hit feedback through the DCS UI (overlays). So whenever you fired a captive training missile, or fired your gun in training mode, the sim would calculate the projectiles "virtually" and display results in an overlay for both shooter and target. Surely useful and fun for immersive training dogfights.

Well, the solution to your problem either way is to fly at the minimum speed (100kph) required to launch multiple rockets.