All Activity

Why should ED give Razbam a PENNY if RB violated the contract? We do know this. Not just from EDs statement, but a few people who were vocal about it BEFORE the lid was closed. While we may not know the EXACT wording of the contracts and legal agreements, it doesn't take a genius to figure out what's in them. We know that ED has a specific version of DCS that is meant for military use. We know that RB didn't have access to it beyond what they did for Dassault for the Mirage 2k. Is it really hard to understand that RB violated that agreement to make a military grade sim out of the same DCS we play when they weren't supposed to? ED has stated they had a contract ready for RB to sign, and they'd have had the money coming in again. One E-Sign, and none of this would be happening. And yet it is. And the only reason people are shaking the pompoms for RB is because Ron went public claiming to be the victim. Why is it so hard for people to understand that when someone is in breach of contract, they don't. get. paid. Employers do it all the time with employees. Do something wrong with your contract (IE, what they're paying you to do), ya don't get paid. And realistically, RB isn't really the developer of these modules, they subcontract the work out. Hence why the South Atlantic map is still seeing work done.

When you start a mission cold and dark the laser isn't working despite the aircraft being armed. This is in DCS 2.9.18.12722

I know its not a high priority, as it doesn't affect functionality, but man, when he says "no inter-visibility/indivisibility on target" it sounds like he's slurring his voice, and there's 2 or 3 extra syllables there that don't sound right. I assume he's saying "no visibility on target", but maybe just say "no visual on target" instead. Is it just me? I don't feel like I'm the only one who has noticed. Maybe I'll just ask Casmo a small favor and have him send a wav file, then I'll package it up and post it to the ED downloads section as a QOL game enhancement

yes, I think it might just be that mission that is bugged. In every other newer campaign the Limas work fin, or maybe it's just a perfect set of coincidences that cause it to lock onto the same tree. Speaking of laser, does your laser not work if you start a mission cold/dark in the ah64 with the newest update?

Update v1.1.3: Gunthrek Academy: F/A-18 Hornet - Bagel Fixpack Edition

If we're going to tar ED with any epithet, negligence is certainly more appropriate than malice or arrogance.

I went to set up some controls for the P-51, and it had a bunch of double binds. Instead of clearing them individually, I cleared all controls. It wiped out the mouse, and I can't figure out how, when you are in F2 external view, to bind the mouse to the view angle.

Already have this and makes no difference on the exports at least

Are you referring to "Enable Water Injection"? If so, I have verified the mapping and when I press it, the manifold pressure doesn't change. That's not to say it's not working, just that that keystroke does nothing. From the real flight handbook:

I've been using that for the most part, though to be honest, on the few occasions I push the lever all the way to the top, it doesn't seem to be making a lot of difference performance wise. Is it the fuel consumption or engine over heating that are most effected?

Correct.

Latest test, no video this time around. Gross weight 12176lbs, 6 rockets and 48% fuel, the closest I could get to that chart. 2700RPM, 59 MP, auto lean = 305 knots ASL, 351mph or 565mkh 2700RPM, 59 MP, auto lean, water injection on = 314 knots ASL (managed to push it to 315 by decreasing the MP a bit to 37-38), or 361mph or 582kmh. null

Again, I will not judge what is wrong or right. I will not play the white knight for any kind of bride. I just want people to be some mediocre kind of constructive...

What about different versions of the aircraft from Eagle Dynamics instead? Something like a Mirage 2000-5, Mirage 2000D, Harrier AV-8B Plus or Harrier GR7/9? F-15EX maybe?

With or without bias, he's not wrong.

Okay, this is a post misleading people by intent. Why? Why do you do that? There is a vast amount of information, that would at least tell you to be careful of any(!) judgement. Anyway, you have made a decision. Your statement does not help one bit. Why do I say that? Look, our common goal should be to get Razbam and ED to finally sign any kind of agreement to implement said settlement to come forward with a solution acceptable for any of customers. Toxic behavior does not help one bit. So, my suggestion is to step back a bit and let ED and RAZBAM actually do "things" without any bias... What Aapje said. There is actually nothing more to add.

I avoid reddit like the cesspool that it is. If what he said is true though, Id like to know the details if possible. You really...should put the pompoms down. You've gone so far to ignore credible information as to everyones credibility that you have none yourself.

I tried version 4.5 and version 3.6 of Blender and the latest ED tools and thetobi one and i just get 1KB files. Does anyone have a working export configuration for Blender?

When I did the slow repair it fixed the issue! Thanks very much for the suggestion! -Chris

Опять пропала тема "Виртуальная реальность в DCS" из "Публикации в которых я участвовал"

Tracks in attach. Essex_dmg_deck_landing_1.trk Essex_dmg_deck_landing_2.trk

тема из "Публикаций" опять пропала:((( ...появилась

Опять тема ВиаРа из "Публикаций" пропала :((( как и тема по настройкам Quest 3 и подобные... Что с форумом постоянно происходит???

That's the middle position, right?