All Activity

Lack of track log is taken to indicate a lack of commitment to reporting this issue.

No, I ask why would you do it this way when you don't have to. I guess we're talking past each other. Not worries! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

First of all. I did not use full throttle. At second test I did not use high blower. You can see it in the screenshot. The green line.

Use the radio menu and call inbound. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Well.. If RB isn't coming back to keep their modules working... I'm sure there's a few people who'd be happy to accept a new job...

I was reading recently that it does take the parallax into account, and even takes wing bending into account.

in legal disputes like this, the money sits in a bank account specifically earmarked for it, and neither side can touch it until the legal issues are fully resolved. So when ED, for example, issues a refund, it's coming out of their pockets, not the escrow account. Now, if the matter is ultimately resolved, and RB comes back to developing the modules... they'll get what they're owed, minus any refunds paid out.

I understand that both ED and RAZBAM are trying to protect their own interests. But now that it's been a long time, no one has really stood up to show how to protect the rights of players. Ultimately, the root cause of this conflict is "money" and the uneven distribution of loot between the two sides. Where did all the money go? One of the premises for you to fight over this money is that someone pays you. And the fundamental source of this money is paid by us players. No matter how your money is divided, it has nothing to do with us players directly. Who violates the agreement and who needs to pay compensation to the other party is one thing, and giving players what they deserve is another thing. Now, just because you have a conflict, we players are going to lose everything. This is ridiculous, especially now that the players' money seems to be in the hands of ED, and ED took the money and cancelled these planes.

Diverting time and ressources from other projects just to replace these aircraft doesn't seem right. ED seems to be overburdened already with their stuff. It would be much easier, if RB just continued the support.

The image is more blurred when QVFR is enabled for me too if I leave it set at x1. I push the foveated region up to x2 with VD godlike. This gives me very sharp images and no ghosting with DLSS quality. However I have a Quest Pro so can get away with a smaller foveated region due to eye tracking. With centre at x2, 0.25x0.25 and periphery at 0.5 I still get a good performance boost over no QVFR at Godlike.

Honestly, with exception to the Mig19, ED has most of the documentation to make a decent 'replacement pack' for those that didn't get refunds, but these aircraft would, by necessity, have to be different versions of what RB made, JUST IN CASE someone in RBs legal department rolls up a newspaper. F-15E can be replaced, like for like, with a different version of the E... I wouldn't go with the EX, as it's too new and there isn't enough documents available yet... but a 1989 or 1990 E model? That'd work. The Mirage 2000C can be replaced by a more recent M2k, maybe the Mirage 2005? Harrier can be replaced by the last USMC version... which has the Hornets radar... which is already in game The Mig19... that's a tough one since getting Russian Documents is notoriously difficult. But there is a team working on the Mig17 right now. The real catch is how much development time would be needed to get each one working. A replacement Strike Eagle could probably be in our hands inside of 6 months with BASIC functionality (A/A weapons, Dumb and Laser-guided Bombs, working flight and damage models), but that's only because they have most of the work done for them with the F-15C (same engines, radar, etc). But a new Harrier or Mirage? We'd need a couple years. Minimum. This all being said... I just hope they can figure something out with RB, either to get them working again, or get the source codes. But until then... pray.

after I leave the wingman at the airfield, I request the tanker, I fill 2k fuel then I land on the carrier, but mission complete isnt pop up, dont know why. also my TAC 112X TCN does work, is it the update issue? thank you.

Call inbound then and please leave this thread alone, cause it's about IFLOLS visibility, mind you.

I don't know if Calvin kicked somebody's ass but I've had an email (not from support) saying a different courier (Black Cat/Yamato, top tier in Japan) will be delivering the unit on Tuesday (29th July). Way better than Amazon's "8th August". Memory kick...it's Yamato that DHL hand off to here. Fedex use a slower one.

Many thanks Scoop - thats probably the only place I didnt look.

No. Corsair core module is 5GB and Marianas WW2 is 9GB, but the latter is optional - you can select it in Module Manager. DCS grows with additions of new units and what you buy and download of course. Patches mostly replace the files with new ones but the unpacking process also needs space esp. for maps.

The only thing we should focus on is that we gonna lose 200/250€ worth of modules because of their issues. All the people here talking about contracts, agreements, and guilt are just wasting their time.

Is the ALR-56M adjusted yet?

Does it get better if you, just for testing, heavily tune down your DCS settings? Like, set it to low quality, low visibility and similar. May I ask, what is your ping towards your flight partner roughly? When it happens and you open your task manager, is there anything that looks like being a bottleneck? For example your RAM or CPU being at 100%? Perhaps you have been playing so close to the max that the overhead of multicrew went beyond the limit and now you are running into a bottleneck.

День добрый. Моделька контейнера Litening будет переделана внешне? Чтобы было видно оптику и прочее, на манер Снайпера? Тем более этот TGP на многих самолётах ED (и не только) используется, а модельке очень много лет...визуально портит немного картину. Добавлю. Ещё вопрос по индикации контейнеров. Почему на экранах МФД не показывается ППМ когда мы ищем цель при помощи TGP? (на странице, собственно, контейнера)

This issue has been troubling me for a long time—I hope it gets fixed as soon as possible

It's been like that for a while. Can't remember if a whole year though.

I would have believed this interpretation, and even that the explicit word “inch” was omitted from the manuals and was just obvious to the pilots at the time - except that 1/4” is very little movement. If it were true it means in practice that the horn will activate only when you pull the throttle all the way back.

That’s strange, there is literally no scripts left in the mission. If the patch really updated it.