All Activity

Hi, please include a track replay example so we can check it. Also please check your bindings for double inputs. thank you

If you think you have public evidence that some thing is wrong please DM us about the ALR-56M, we hare happy to look at it. So far we have not seen any convincing evidence. We can not take peoples word that "something is wrong" so please if you have evidence shoot us a message. thank you

It's not, however, that's the point. Needles in pneumatic flight instruments don't shake, vintage or modern, doesn't matter, physics is the same. Whether the gauge has diaphragm or bourdon tube inside, the air filters out small pressure irregularities quite well. Granted, entire insrument panel shaking from engine vibrations or stall may induce wobble indeed (after all, panels were usually mounted on rubber dampers, not bolted stiff to the fuselage), but not to the scale present in current module version. Mech-driven instruments, like engine tachos - sure, depending on how they're driven exactly they can be a bit more shaky than pneumo ones. I'd say if Corsair module needle animation is here to stay, it should at least be toned down. Apart from th vids above, here are a couple of warbird examples showing how much wobble one can expect in various phases of flight:

Hi everybody, First sorry for my broken english. Since yesterday I can't fly no more the A10CII. since I take off or even starting in flight the plane pitch up and i must strongly push to stabilize. One way I tried is to put fly control on reverse on the left console. That's not a sustainable solution. It was working fine before and I flew many hours before. Any Idea ? Thanks

Okay, here ya go: “Public Court System”

I’m not asking for daily transcripts or drama. Just a minimum level of clarity and honesty from a company that continues to sell modules and build its reputation on trust. Silence may avoid short-term noise, but long-term uncertainty erodes confidence... especially when paying customers are the ones left with broken promises. A simple, honest update like “We’re limited by X, and here’s what we can or can’t do right now” would go a long way. That’s not unreasonable... it’s basic respect.

First, at this point everything you are all debating is just noise. What is ED's plan to keep this from happening going forward? What is their way to fix it for their customers now that it has happened? I have three Razbam modules that are already degrading in terms of functionality, have never received promised features, and it sounds like they'll stop working soon. How is ED going to fix this? Refunds? I'm not interested in "store credits", if that is the solution. I already own the modules I want. Second, what should my expectation be in regards to 3rd parties? The modules I purchase could just stop receiving support at any time? Polychop had some well-publicized issues right after the release of the Kiowa... another reminder of how "fragile" ED's current business model is. Which brings me to the third point: Is there any belief that this business model is sustainable? It takes years, sometimes 7 or 8 years, for these modules to be developed and released between actual development time and time spent in "early access". Does ED believe it is a sound business model to have to maintain an ever-growing portfolio of modules with no revenue stream beyond their initial purchase? Over time, it would become an exponential amount of work to maintain these modules while developing the core game, with the only source of revenue being new "early access" releases that take years to develop. I believe that is why the CH-47 was released in such a bare-bones state, has seen such slow progress, etc. I think the model is bad, and if not already in trouble, eventually will be in trouble without some ongoing source of revenue to sustain the existing modules, terrains, and core game (subscription?). I know it isn't a popular view, but it is real.

I'd love to see voice command added too but the fewer AI GIBs we have the easier it will be

Something that should exist

Suggest you google the definitions of Litigation. It's the Legal Process or resolving right's disputes. It does not always goto court. Both parties meet, with a legal representative from a legal firm. Most of the time Companies resolve their disputes in a conference room w/ a legal mediator. Or in modern / post covid times, on Teams/Skype/Video Conferencing Apps w/ Both Parties + the Legal Mediator w/ digital transcripts created for each session etc etc. If both parties were too busy shooting shots at each other over discord and social media and newsletters, nothing would be salvageable. there wouldn't bee any progress. ED being silent helps more than you know, they simply release updates stating as much. What do you want them to do? release a newsletter and have them post PDF transcripts of any conferencing sessions and attendence logs showing who doesn't show up and who does, who buys the krispy kremes and who buys the starbucks.?

POKER and CHAOS are not in the same group, causing POKER to be a green icon on the HDS and not a blue icon as a member of the player flight. POKER is correctly setup, but CHAOS has the same callsign as POKER, but a different group name.

Sure, discretion matters... but silence from ED and broken promises still affect us directly. Customers aren’t bound by NDAs, but we are paying for the consequences. When one side goes silent and the other speaks out, even messily, it’s often the only way the public gets any sense of what’s happening. That’s not ideal, but neither is being left completely in the dark.

Can anyone help? When i boresight my mavericks in the air, the sniper pod seems to still be looking at them even when I CZ the pod. Fiddle about with the views but cannot get it to look at the targeted SPI.

The situation is much exaggerated in your JPG screenshot. Here's a PNG taken with the default zoom view: yellow figures are OK, green figures are not very readable, indeed.

hey all while using liberation mod I have noticed when I use a modern battle on dcs base maps or even purchased maps I usually get 72fps average even in battles. When I use WW2 battles on any map I only get up to 35fps and even drops down to 11fps at time. I have even tried to keep allied forces low as not to have too many planes but still same results... Glenn.

What litigation? What proceedings? Nothing has gone or is going to court. There was an agreement. And even ED has said it wasn’t implemented. So if there was a nda, get over it, that agreement is over.

Well, this is odd, and the usual backup file which is made every time DCS updates to a new version does not contain the textures, only my modified .LUA file…! Also, including my clean cockpit in: C:\Users\XXX\Saved Games\DCS\Mods\aircraft\F4U-1D\Liveries\Cockpit_F4U-1D\default Or: C:\Users\XXX\Saved Games\DCS\Mods\aircraft\F4U-1D\Liveries\Cockpit_F4U-1D\AC Is to no avail. Only option is putting ALL my cockpit files in: D:\Games\DCS World\Mods\aircraft\F4U-1D\Liveries\Cockpit_F4U-1D\default So it works. Though again, very odd thing, if other cockpits than my “AC” are selected, they don’t appear, in any case only my clean cockpit appears. Go figure… Do backup it in case, though alternatively, you can still re-download it. Cheers.

I don't fly the F-16 but the HARM is designed to remember the location of the emitting radar if it goes off. That was a feature added to real world HARMs due to experience with the Vietnam War when SAM radar operators turned off their radars due to a Shrike or Standard ARM attack and confuse the missile. If I'm reading right then that's intended behavior.

Loose Lips Sink Ships. Even if ED was 100% the bad guy *(assuming, just to play devils advocate)*, RB and Associates contract breaches don't help their cause, nor the proceedings, nor the litigation, nor the resolution. It's like trying to end a fight with your spouse for driving your car, you say fine honey, lets settle this, and she/he brings up random events from 2 months ago, not applicable to the current fight, then calls you a broke deadbeat because you wont give him/her your debit card so they can goto the mall and buy things and you want him/her to pay for their own gas.

@BJ55 This does not look normal at all. I'll try this resolution right away. Can you please send me your options.lua ? (from Saved Games/DCS/Config)

No, I don't notice anything bottlenecking. Sitting on the ground with my friend as WSO, my CPU and RAM were both in total at around 60% and my GPU at 30%. DCS was using 40-50% of my CPU and 3 GB of my RAM. Today it was more playable and I could actually use the Jester UI with some lag. Tuning down my graphics settings to low didn't change anything noticable. My ping to him is roughly 60 ms

Because at night you can't even see the elevation light. It's been brought up numerous times. I even suggested this overlay idea as well. Tankers in general need a rework but only a small percent of users touch the tankers so it's barely even a priority to get fixed.

Have you removed the springs from your pedals yet?

Apologies, but I don't understand why you cannot do this stuff before the mission, and then load the results in the kneeboard.

Where are those? [emoji848] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk