All Activity

I am glad you enjoy it. Fingers have been crossed!

Hello everyone, this is Shaft, from Myself Dynamic! As an active participant in the gazelle community, a day one fan of this historical module (one of the first 3rd party module) in DCS, and a livery creator for Polychop, I must say I'm 100% with what was written by @peeter It is not because the gazelle is a "niche" module that Polcyhop can act like if it doesn't matter, and we really need to get people at ED involved in this. There are guidelines, rules, commitment toward costumers, and some basic criteria are just not met by Polychop right now. We know for sure that not a single resource is dedicated to the gazelle, and this is a reality for over a year and a half almost.. There is a long list of easy fix that is just lying there and no one cares about it... Please, someone have to make it right. For the sake of the gazelle, and the credibility of both Polychop (and by them, ED...) Take care all

I already lost my favourite aircraft, the Mirage-2000 and now i'm loosing my favourite helicopter. It really breaks my heart to see what's happening to DCS. I hope this situation gets resolved soon.

Hey Avalanche, thank you very much. Sounds promising, I will have a look at it.

@BIGNEWY SSAO OFF does not work. I have turned SSAO off, other things ON/OFF - all kinds of variations. It doesn't matter. The SSAO "solution" I think first spread on Reddit, but in reality it is not an solution. Maybe it lowers the visibility for some, but not for me and others. How much testing has the developers put into this instead of repeating the "solution"? In Eagle Dynamics defense I don't think they are to blame for it either. It is a Quad views problem - but likely in combination with other things. The only thing that reduces the problem (for me at least) is turning sharpening in DCS graphic settings down. It does not go away totally but it becomes more playable. Certain scenarios and lighting conditions makes it more or less visible. I thought I got rid of it after turning down sharpening, but then - new tried a new terrain, new lighting conditions and there it was again... Also having a very small foveated region makes it more pronounced I think. For the record, my visible sqaure is not as dark as the original poster here. It is more bright. Also, other screen shots I have seen of this, in DCS Forums and elsewhere have brighter squares than in the first post here. Now, in MSFS 2024, Quadviews was implemented some time ago. And there they have discovered the exact same problem. And it is not just a Pimax Quadviews problem, but people using static quad views with Quest 3 and even HP Reverb G2 sees it too when activating Quadviews. I have also seen people with Varjo headsets reporting this. See this thread: https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/quad-views-brightness-difference-in-clouds/715212/14 That thread started in April, but the problem still persists even in the latest beta for Update 4. Hopefully ED will look into it, and see what they can do on their part. SSAO OFF does not solve it. Certainly not for everyone. Never hurts to try, but we have to keep it real. My suggestions for those who are bothered with it: 1. Try increasing the Foveated rendering area 2. Try increasing the Transition thickness area Both of this will decrease perfomance so not an ideal solution. But perhaps play around with it and see what is tolerable. 3. Turn down sharpening in DCS Settings. Can give a negative impact with image clarity compared to what you are used to. But again, what is worse? Big square outline or loose some sharpness? I tried lowering sharpness in Tally Mouse Quadviews companion app too, but that didn't seem to have such an impact. Though I am not sure. So in summary - SSAO OFF is not the solution. This is not just a DCS problem - it is there in MSFS 2024 too when using quad views. This is not just a Pimax problem. Quest, HP Reverb and Varjo users reports the same thing. Certain lighting situations makes it more visible.

*cries quietly in trying to get stable, reliable, simming with DCS and the horrific afterthought that is Meta's idea of PCVR with it's Link software* Note to those who want to get VR - get something where the designers actually have at least 1% of a clue what PCVR is about and how people actually use their headsets.

В ИЛ-2 ещё замечательный эффект капель на фонаре, когда в облака залетаешь

I’ve been spending a lot of time in the CH47 recently and one thing that has stood out is how good the physics of the sling load cables is (at least when connected to a heavy object). Why can’t we have that for the SC’s arresting wires?

Nice! looks like recorded in VR?

Hmm you know that there isn't a AC-130 - there will be a C-130J Super Hercules at launch and later a MC-130J Commando II - but for now no AC-130

Hello in M01 it happened to me that during the enroute to the BFM training area Saint dives from 15000ft down to the deck (600 ft msl or so). After a while he climbs up again to 15k ft. During the climb he reports "speed and angels right". Restarted the Mission because I lost visual because of this unexpected descent and it happened again.

@OmasRachE If you haven't come across this already, you might find it interesting.

Something probably changed in the map which in turn altered the AI behaviour. Thanks for reporting this, possibly parking spot numbering was altered. Should be an easy fix.

РСЗО БМ-21-1 "Град" 122-мм (Россия). Рассматриваем, читаем характеристики. Смотреть видео.

The more I get into the mission building process, the more I wish they make it happen. Even that other sim is way more immersive when it comes to use radios and for me this is the biggest weakness of DCS.

Das JTAC Script hatte ich komplett vergessen ich werd Alt Danke dir Yurgon, denke das ist genau, was Jonny sucht .)

Adding the ability to add/remove hard point and suppressor using the rearm/refuel menu

No big deal, someone took the time to tell me. If you like to learn more about BVR engagements or other fighter tactics I can highly recomend joining a virtual squadron. There are many out there from the most casual bunch of sim pilots up to hardcore milsim dudes. And every one I got to know till now is very kind and supportive. It will boost your learning process like hell.

Ребят такой вопрос а при работающем gnirehtet шлем вообще должен пинговаться?

That would change the language of the user interface of the software, not the module buddy. Only time will tell. I mean, did they even have Natasha in German?

Thanks! I know it is just a niche a problem, therefor great that you guys are looking into it

No creo que sea buena idea compartir las misiones compradas sin consentimiento del creador. Lo más seguro es compartir el archivo de traducción para que quienes hayan comprado las campañas DLC tengan solo que adjuntar el archivo con el idioma de español, si necesitas alguna de las que tengo, te puedo pasar ese archivo para que solo lo adjuntes el archivo MIZ con Winrar y ya lo tengas en español, claro, solo de las misiones que dispongo.

You are also thinking about procedures? Like SID, STAR etc?

Су-33 в DCS по одной сбрасывать не умеет.