All Activity

I reply them.... has a ED official press release about them confirm the module? And yes, I know all story... and "claims".

Remember ED release the old RRG Studios content kickstarted rescue them and complete (P-47, Fw-190A-8, Spitfire Mk.IX), and ED make the others (P-51D, Fw-190D-9, Mosquito) Modules. ED continue with WW2 with the release of Marianas WW2 map, the incoming modules of F6F Hellcat, and the future A6M5 Zero and the PTO WW2 assets pack. Other 3rd parties as M3 (release the F4-U and some free PTO units to WW2), Octopus-G (release the I-16 type 24 and has making the La-7), continue making modules to WW2 . Actually the Dynamic Campaing has on progress by ED, but the first iteration has modern, and WW2 coming later (No dates to release yet). Ugra Media continue making expansions to Normandy WW2 2.0 and ED has not expanded the Channel Map (has no talked yet about the next WW2 map). Nick Grey has claimed about make BoB modules and more content on a future after PTO. But not bad if other 3rd parties move to build more WW2 modules and maps. Campaign creators as Reflected Simulations, SUNS Simulations, and others, has continue making campaigns to WW2.

Odd. Yeah, probably try without mods then. They have caused severe issues in the past for no apparent reason. A screenshot of your "tiny ingame manual" and your settings page (graphics and f4 special options) would help :)

Almost home thanks for taking the time to respond Zabuzard but no I am using a ancient acer monitor but runs at 1080p

Fun campaign for me. Fuel management is definitely a challenge for me too. I completed Mission 8 - working on a perfect score until I ran out of gas within sight of the runway and crashed. I may have hit AB when chasing an AA threat, so the next try at M8 I made sure not to go wild chasing AA targets. I also dropped my three external tanks once they went empty. I know this wouldn't be normal for actual missions, so maybe its technical cheating. However, I did get back safely on the ground at Incirlik with about 1500 lbs of fuel reserve. Also with M8 since you have to follow your flight leader everywhere, I don't know if AAR is an option - although given I suck at this, probably would just get me running out of fuel chasing a tanker.

нет у меня временных интервалов Л006 для конкретного изделия (БРЛС) описание самой станции конца семидесятых я думаю у Вас имеется ! Но повторюсь еще раз ,БРЛС имеет приемопередатчик и приемник запирается во время работы передатчика ,и соответственно идентичные команды проходят и на СПО и на ответчик поскольку при работе БРЛС есть и сигнал опознавания, иначе комплекс будет не работоспособным ! То что указывается что при работе БРЛС на излучение все мной перечисленные изделия бланкируются это и есть НОРМАЛЬНАЯ работа комплекса РЛПК ! в противном случае Береза видит только свою угрозу, ответчик отвечает только на свои запросы, РЛС видит только свой сигнал ,то есть комплекс не работоспособен ! а этого НЕТ при нормальном сопряжении всех элементов комплекса ! ! !

in both my og crystal, AND my super ultrawide.. night missions are impossible to play. All light sources disappear in the foveated region, and it looks like im wearing foggy goggles. I have to crank the in game gamma up to 3.5 to see anything.. and even then.. its pretty horrible experience... take the first mission of the Fear the Bones campaign for example.. i tried playing without quadviews, and without DFR, and that completely fixed the issues.... but 30fps... with a 5090 and 9800x3d... not acceptable.

Are you using a multimonitor setup or sth like HELIOS? What resolution did you set in ur DCS settings? Maybe something very big so it works for multi-monitor? In that case you would need to fiddle with the Special Settings of the F4 HB UI. Screenshots will definitely help once you can share them :)

Реально не понимаешь??? ТЕБЕ РУССКИМ ЯЗЫКОМ ГОВОРЯТ КАК ЕСТЬ В НАЧАЛЕ ЭКСПЛУАТАЦИИ, КАК ПОЛОЖЕНО И КАК ВЫПОЛНЯЕТСЯ! Что в технической и эксплуатационной документации пишется, даже самый альтернативно одарённый может прочесть фразу..."про ЗЕЛЁНЫЕ!!! лампы на ИП52"...Кто и что потом просрал в части не отменяет тот факт, что ИЗНАЧАЛЬНО распайка была такой и никак иначе и если кто то ни разу в жизни не видел новый или относительно новый самолёт уж точно не повод утверждать, что так "всегда было"... И это не "мои" документы, это ЗАКОН обязательный к исполнению! Вот что здесь непонятного написано??? Или считаете себя умнее и технически грамотнее людей составивших например данное учебное пособие? Прочти хоть это, проникнись, просто ПОДУМАЙ!

Так точно, всегда включаю.

The PG has featured complete, and ED has no plans to expand them.

Starts in about an hour.

Мда бронебойность зашкаливает... КТО и ГДЕ писал что это эталон?!Фантазировать не надоело? Вам пишут как есть на самом деле. А вы со своими документами... Вы такими очевидными вещами оперируете... что даже лень опровергать. Ну вы ещё расскажите что проезжую часть нельзя вне "Зебры" переходить, а то мы же не в курсе... Но всё равно многие так делают.

Steam sale starts soon, if the Mig-29 is 50% off, guaranteed I'll buy it.

Oh, I'm perfectly fine with these obvious limitations. What keeps getting me is how they are too busy telling me about something they saw crossing the border into Angola to even let me know they are also seeing that enemy interceptor going straight for me. AI is not exactly DCS' strong suite, and AWACS/GCI has so little sense of priorities that it wants to be in the race for top contender. I rank them about on par with the ATC when it alternates between 'cleared to land' and 'go around' for a minute straight.

Tacview's Autumn Sale has begun: 30% off Tacview Standard and Advanced from September 29th to October 6th. To upgrade from Tacview Standard to Tacview Advanced, email us at support@tacview.net Happy flying! https://tacview.net/purchase/

А не надоело "рогом упираться" игнорируя то, что ДОЛЖНО быть и выставлять как эталон то, что является результатом нарушения, ещё и гордиться этими "косяками"? Ваше "как на фото" это результат длительной эксплуатации конкретных "бортов" получившийся при не соблюдении правил этой эксплуатации.. Нормальный "борт" с завода приходит с зелёной индикацией шасси и механизации крыла, и как бы ты не упирался, так было есть и будет, а "выгорание" можно в игре и воспроизвести, чем старее самолёт, тем более блёклые цвета...

That is too old plane for that. It's computer is pretty limited. Maybe someone can correct me, but I think it is not possible. And MiG-29A is designed for short flights, probably wouldn't need that.

I would like to see the Venn diagram of people constantly wishing for and buying new aircraft modules vs the people who fly public PvP exclusively. Is it a perfect circle?

This is the answer

I believe the answer is somewhere between "no" and "never".

The People's Republic of China's all new forum account, obviously.

Those rumors about Dassault have been circulating since the time of the Mirage 2000C, over 10 years ago, and there has never been an official module with their name on it, nor any third-party French developer or similar project endorsed by them. So, until ED confirms it, they remain just rumors...

While I do not entirely disagree with the sentiment, I would like to remind everyone that BLUFOR and REDFOR are concepts that only live in head of your mission designer in question. I, personally, also enjoy certain scenarios that are reasonably inspired by the world I live in, but especially in multiplayer (the only place where 'balance' really means a thing) there is no rule against using the modules you want to use for the sides you want them on. The 'traditional' redfor folks have just been handed an all-new MiG-29. Long overdue, I'd say, but it's there. Use it for, like, twenty minutes, before insisting that you need something else. Thus, what it boils down to rather quickly, is just your usual 'I would like to use this particular airframe' wish.