All Activity

Actually, it may be considered disrespectful by other users, the spanish section of the Forum is there for a reason: https://forum.dcs.world/forum/28-espanol/ En realidad, postear aqui en español puede considerarse como una falta de respeto hacia los demas usuarios, es preferible que abra un hilo en la sección hispano parlante del Foro.

Hey, so we have some more issues that we found out, basic story goes like this: in Auto Mode as of my knowledge radar should change PRF on its own in STT depending of targets aspect (Cold or Hot), so what is issue is that when i lock target in Hot aspect in Auto radar mode, when he starts defending and turns Cold i lose lock even giving a fact that we have speed difference greater that +-50kmh and we are closer than 15km of range and he is above horizon so that is issue number one. Second issue is that if target is let's say less than 20km from me and he is Hot i can't lock him in AUTO or Head On mode but i have radar contact of him on HUD, only way i found to avoid this is to use TWF/FHS so its snaps it self and auto locks at small ranges. 3rd is again with Vertical (Close) mode for radar, for targets coming our way i can't get lock but if target is Cold and above horizon and not maneuvering much lock could be achived but at limited range of around +-5km. 4th is about P mode, to me this is very weak mode for Hot and Cold targets, its impossible to lock targets at more than 15km range, i think this should be given more power and buffed as to me it makes no sense to have R-27ER with +30km range and not being able to lock target in P mode which is for closer ranges. Hope this helps for further investigation and fixes. AUTOmodeIssue123.trk 1.acmi

Hello, Is it possible to disable the DAMPER function (despite it being advised against in the manual?) or will this be possible in a future update? Sincerely, Michael

I'm not sure, maybe you are using the KB dynamic kneeboards? I have little experience with those, as I only use static kneeboards.

Чёза квадрат, сделайте скрин, пожалуйста, кто-нибудь

Thx for the info, I'll do a re-run tomorrow of the the mission.

Updating SRS fixed the issue.

hello. you should raise your own post. this post is many years old.

No hay problema. Podemos traducir, hermano.

Most of the time when I fly the F16 and datalink / L16 / TNDL does not work because the AWACS startsup later, I just reset it by using the MIDS/LVT knob. Just switching it from ON to OFF and ON again makes the datalink work again.

Same here. Initially had left and right engine axes mapped to a split throttle, but the custom curves kept on resetting the next day. After switching to the single thrust axis (and clearing the other two), the settings on that axis persist after restarts

Looks good! Maybe the glass could have a bit of dirt in the edges, a few scratches and be less clean? I hope at some point ED add animations for the throttle and joystick.

Also, explained here:

Yes! The good feature to have pencil for wright on it during flight. Synchronizing with DTC could be also helpful.

In a perfect world... I believe the main problem is that various maps are build with "different tech", and we also run into "the earth is flat" problems.

Блин, думал где то отдельные значки для этого есть. Спасибо.

Hey everyone, While the performance went way up using medium textures when flying the Chinook (thanks ED for this option !), my friends have super low FPS when I fly my CH-47D with them on the same server. They do NOT own the module, thus can’t set any options to lower the VRAM usage. Is this a known issue Thanks

Да с цветом илс какая-то шнRга. С "общением" с РП проблем не наблюдаю. Пробовал в нескольких миссиях. Модов сторонних не установлено у тебя? Проверь канал радиостанции. Сломали что-то граждане разработчики

Does anybody know where this 'tempMission.lua' file is? It doesn't exist in that folder. And Grok said it was a dynamically generated temp file when you create kneeboards. So, I'm also wondering why it's being called from DCS at all? ERROR Lua::Config (Main): load error C:\Users\User\Saved Games\DCS\KNEEBOARD/002-missionbriefing-001.lua:no file 'C:\Users\User\Saved Games\DCS\Data\Kneeboard Builder Config\Kneeboard Data\tempMission.lua'. ERROR Lua::Config (Main): load error C:\Users\User\Saved Games\DCS\KNEEBOARD/002-missionbriefing-002.lua:no file 'C:\Users\User\Saved Games\DCS\Data\Kneeboard Builder Config\Kneeboard Data\tempMission.lua'. ERROR Lua::Config (Main): load error C:\Users\User\Saved Games\DCS\KNEEBOARD/002-missionradios-001.lua:no file 'C:\Users\User\Saved Games\DCS\Data\Kneeboard Builder Config\Kneeboard Data\tempMission.lua'. ERROR Lua::Config (Main): load error C:\Users\User\Saved Games\DCS\KNEEBOARD/002-missionradios-002.lua:no file 'C:\Users\User\Saved Games\DCS\Data\Kneeboard Builder Config\Kneeboard Data\tempMission.lua'.

Thanks! I installed all of my modules into that new clean install. I made a mission with most of my flyables flown by ai. And the log had around 250 errors.. So sad..

Да, в реале именно этот квадрат.

I was wondering why the Tin Shield radar included in the SA-5 group template had a search range less than its missile's maximum launch range, so I searched the forums and found the following posts: https://forum.dcs.world/topic/278213-tin-shield-radar-incorrectly-named-as-sa-5-search-radar/ https://forum.dcs.world/topic/209899-sa-5-any-updates/page/5/ In short, while the original SA-5 SR was being developed, the Tin Shield was temporarily used as an SR. And once the radar for the actual SA-5 is developed, they said they would replace the Tin Shield with that radar. This was written in 2021, but it still hasn't changed. I don't want to see the range of this fantastic missile reduced. When will radar development be completed?

i,am sorry...solo hablo español

I suggest you take a closer look at all 5 tacviews and see when chaffing was stoped and how missile is missing target that is no longer droping chaffs.