All Activity
- Past hour
-
>I could certainly see the potential if it was possible to improve the response speed Did you do any tweaking in the SRS software. The response speed is very good in my view if you pull the leavers all the way. In fact I had to dial it back several notches as I was nearly thrown out of the seat when crashing. null
-
Schönes Display, aber zu viel rumgeswitche zwischen den Kameras :) Mal schauen, ob ein Looping in DCS machbar ist
-
my understanding is that the mod is completely standalone, you don't need any other mods to use it (I think).
-
MiG-29 Fulcrum with AGM-88?
Raven (Elysian Angel) replied to ThorBrasil's topic in DCS: MiG-29A Fulcrum
-
Hello again, I am sorry I forgot to anwear your question. I tested Godlike inside of Virtual Desktop (VD) but now I am running High (RTX 3070) since I have a RTX 3080, but perhaps I should try to adjust it up again? I so pleased with the multiplayer framerate I got (the post above this one) so I dont know if I dare to change anything again
-
I'd love to know this as well. I've tried this mapping on PvP Cold War servers with decidedly mixed results.
-
Hello all! I wanted to improve my multiplayer performence on my Quest 3S and managed to get solid 72 FPS on Contention multiplayer server with 24 players logged in. My play test session had a duration of 30 min and the FPS did not drop one single time, it was rock solid. I was piloting the F-18 Hornet from Eagle Dynamics and Contention server used the Syria map. Please see my pictures below: 1. I tried to take a picture with my mobilephone inside my VR-headset (through the lenses) but I could not get a good image. So I had to take picture above my VR-headset and on my monitor (showing the VR-view in 2D). On the top left corner you can see the FPS. On the top right corner you can see Contention server messages and in center the player list. 2. The second picture is a close-up photo from my mobilephone on the FPS (Frame rate). 3. This is the settings I used inside of Virtual Desktop. I increased VR Desktop Rate and VR Bitrate on the sliders (I increased them with atleast 100%). 4. Inside the Nvidia Control Panel I chose the DCS client and then changed power settings for DCS from Energy Saving Mode to Maximal Power. 5. The last image is my graphics settings inside of DCS, in the Settings tab.
-
Screenshots and Stories
ALPHA-WHISKEY replied to ALPHA-WHISKEY's topic in Iran | 404th Freelancers's Media
-
can't control weapons of TOR M2 and Pantsir
currenthill replied to ZioSam's topic in Bugs and Problems
Thanks, but I think you misunderstood, my main priority isn't CA, it's their AI performance. Thus, having the more realistic radars is my main priority. If I wouldn't be able to find a way to implement them together with player control, I would choose the more advanced radar features. -
Hello again Qcumber! You won't belive this! I managed to get rock- solid -stable : 72 FPS in multiplayer on Contention Server! On my Quest 3S!!!! To prove I am not joking with you all, I have taken pictures posted below 1. The first picture shows my photo from my mobilphone, I tried to take the picture inside the VR-headset but it was impossible to get a good image. On the picture you can see in the left top corner the FPS. You can also see on the top right corner Contention server text messages and in the middle is the server list with the players. 2. Second picture is a close-up photo from my mobilephone on the FPS. 3. This is changes I made in Virtual Desktop. I increased on the slider my VR Bitrate and Desktop Rate (I increased it with 100%). 4. In the Nvidia Control Panel I selected DCS and then changed the power setting (for DCS client) from Energy Saving to Maximal Power. 5. Last picture is my DCS Settings inside the simulator in the Settings Tab.
-
Есть и проверку проходят, зависит от сервера. Так же у нас уже есть практически готовая кабина, но её же надо лично вам обязательно засрать? Тоже позволю вставить не менее остроумную цитату: "Не трогай то, что уже работает".
-
Moin, Mal wieder GPU. Würde mir gerne für VR eine neue GPU zulegen. Leider kann ich nicht aus dem vollen schöpfen und muss Kompromisse machen. Finanziell würde ich so im Rahmen einer 5070ti sein. Ich schwanke zwischen einer 5070ti und Radeon 9070. Eigentlich würde ich eher in Richtung Nvidia gehen, da DCS wohl diesen Hersteller in VR wohl lieber mag. Andererseits scheint sich bei AMD wohl der Treiber verbessert zu haben und ich lese nun öfters, dass die 9070 Besitzer recht zufrieden sind mit DCS und VR. Die Frage. Hat hier jemand zufällig Erfahrung mit den beiden Karten ? Und kann ganz klar aus Erfahrung eine Empfehlung geben ? Oder vielleicht doch noch bis Ende 2025 warten und schauen was kommt und dann eventuell nochmals sparen? Frank
-
Thank You!
-
RGR, goot to know those assets are going to be improved, my humble suggestion was to keep them in the legacy mode , while you work on the improvements, but something is always better than nothing, anyway congrats for the release, a very needed fresh air into DCS world units
-
Ukraine operates 2010s Era MiG-29MU2s, recently upgraded to utilize western weapons such as AASM, MALD, HARM, SDB and JDAM-ER. ED is making a ~1980s era MiG-29 9.12A.
-
So, when could we get the SA-4? Honestly, I’d love to have it for Syria or Cold War Germany. It would be a great addition, because spamming SA-2/3/6 everywhere feels kind of “meh” if you want something medium/high-range.The SA-5, on the other hand, is just too powerful—even with the lowest search radar it can still detect aircraft at 87 nm, and it doesn’t even have different tracking radar options.So why not also give us different types of radars for the SAMs? There are multiple variants out there, and it would make the setups a lot more interesting. It’s great that we already have the Pantsir and Tor-M2, plus the IRIS-T thanks to Currenthill (and I really love those), but at least fix the gap—same as with the MiG-21 and MiG-29. Where’s the MiG-23? JOKE XD And is there even a chance that we’re going to get it? I’ve never seen a post from anybody about the SA-4. Just asking. Just giving this page a little bump. I even found a very cool video (never knew this existed ):
-
Isn't this version of the MiG-29A the same one that ED is releasing? Would it be possible to add this to the DCS? https://www.twz.com/air/ukraines-black-mig-29-ghost-fulcrum-showcased-in-new-video
-
celestHawk started following FLAP Switch
-
Hello, Whenever I try to move the FLAP switch either 'Takeoff from parking hot' or 'Takeoff from runway' I must 'push' the switch with mouse cursor and then I'm able to actuate the switch with a key bind 'F' or controller. It is not speed related, I checked the manual once again and is not starting to work before pressing it with the mouse. My guess is that most of the time we start it on the ramp cold and we must switch it to AUTO position in order to perform the FLCS test on surfaces that's is stayed unnoticed or am I missing something?
-
MonmineDCS started following VNAO T-45 Goshawk
-
Do you have to install a plane or a Module like FC3 One something Pls let me know
-
Это работает в обе стороны. Есть модификации на свежие кабины. Они проверку в сетевой игре не проходят, но кого это волнует? "Не говори мне - я не скажу, куда идти; пути врозь идут."
-
Negative dude. You have 3 waypoints near the main targets and they are static, a precision and smart weapon like the CBU-103 is a great fit. In fact, IR Maverick / JDAM / JSOW / WCMD / HARM all make sense for this DEAD mission. (Of course, the real limitation is just what guided munitions are available in the mission's inventory at Akrotiri, that's out of my hands LOL wwwww) You'll know how to handle the SA-8 threat, if you completed the First in Weasels over Syria. Good luck!
-
Hi all, Glad to see there are some good stories about the Pimax Crystal Super. Unfortunately for me, the story so far is not great at all. I pre-paid for my Super in November 2024, and after several broken promises in timelines, I finally got my supper by end of July 2025. For me, it was crystal clear (pun intended) that there was something VERY wrong with my headset. The visuals were rather poor, and when looking at the Sky in DCS I could really see a tiny tiny very little "grid" or "mesh", which of course killed any experience immersion. Like Mura, but a case of critically bad Mura as I could see this tiny grid. After about 2 or 3 weeks of ford and comes, sending photos, videos and log files, Pimax finally agreed on sending me another engine. But that would take 1 or 2 months they said, so I would expect to receive the other engine by end of September 2025. Not great after spending a large amount of money on this, so I am afraid that so far my experience with Pimax quality has been rather poor. They are good on replying quickly though, so at least something good out of this. I now have to wait for quite a while before being able to check if all the videos I have seen on Youtube about the "waaaoo" experience are true or not. I just really hope the new engine is up to the visual standards a good number of youtubers say. Thanks! PS. Anyone is aware of a "competing" VR headset? Just for in case the Super keeps providing disappointments?
- Today
-
Тем более, если труда не составит, то и платить за это не надо, а желающий жирных куриц будет решать это отдельно. Например, модами.
-
The amount of trim you get with one click on the trim button is way too fast. Thats why you cant get the F16 trimmed out perfectly, nor can you bring the trim back to neutral, because of the sensitivity of the input you just overshoot the perfect trim value. A trim reset is a good workaround, and or reducing the speed of the trim input per click would be the realistic way to approach it.