All Activity

Are you a third party developer ? only I am wondering how you know.

Так разработчик обещал же SID/STAR. Не со старта РД, а в принципе. пмсм эти стандартные схемы ну интересно конечно попробовать. Несколько раз. Речь, как я понимаю, о тех стандартных маршрутах, которые рисуются на экране и могут быть выполнены на автопилоте. Это наскучит, лететь полчаса витиеватым путем к полосе, которая вот она, рукой подать. В жизни, в половине случаев, не меньшее, АТС сокращают эти схемы. Порой от них остается вектор к финальному развороту на посадочный и баста, вот и весь STAR. SID-ы тоже срезаются и итак, сами по себе, часто простые, один-два отворота и улетел. Мне интереснее в игре самому сообразить и построить заход. Или даже нарисовать его на экране, какой угодно. Уходящие в историю, так называемые «схемы традиционной навигации», такие как DME Arc, VOR, 2NDB, NDB, тут вообще мало кто может просто рассказать как лететь. А они ведь доступны в DCS сегодня, пожалуйста. Целый нетронутый многими пласт геймплея. Обычно же в игре мы как делаем: летим с задания, находим аэродром, радостно в него пикируем, если не успеваем оттормозиться, то крутим какой-нибудь пердимонокль для погашения скорости и высоты и заходим на посадку, визуально. Серверы обычно предлагают хорошую погоду.

If only it were that easy (in general).

Thank you very much everyone.

New screenshot (of BD), not high res:

[ E-TF ] Eclipse Task-Force We are a results driven Competitive Squadron who take pride in there members success and growth. We predominately field the the JF-17, but accept all airframes if the player show promise. That includes: ( F-18, F-15E/C, F-16, F-14 ) We are looking for pilots who are interested in competitive DCS, if you have any questions, feel free to ask If you wish to apply, send an application in the ⁠#apply-here channel in our discord using the provided template. Discord link: https://discord.gg/cymvtEYG5T https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfh-tB-Fvog

It's just another little hidden dig at ED.

If the joystick supports it: Might as well bind the stick lever button to Autopilot Disengage and the stick lever axis to Both Brakes It gives no issues airborne and no issues on the ground

Show me an AI that can generate a textured 3D model that's usable in a game. This task is orders of magnitude harder than making a 2D drawing, and training data is much more sparse, not to mention not easily extracted from free content. In fact, this is the very reason why 3D models are more often sold than offered for free. There's also no easy way to steal 3D work, since 3D previews are a rarity, and most models are showcased via 2D images. That's before you factor in very specific requirements for models to be used in a game engine. As such, I don't see LLMs ever being able to do much useful work with 3D. Sure, an artist could figured out some way to use them, but a lot of legwork will remain to be done by hand. There seem to be some AI model generators, but I'm not sure how they work in real world use cases. Even if they create passable models for static renders, they're unlikely to be easy to convert to something that can be used in a game. I don't call that top tier content. That humans have made similar slop doesn't mean it's worth anything. It may make it possible to churn those out quicker, but it's a long way from the top. As of recently, it's being used for SFX in a proper movie, and it supposedly shortened some work that's tricky to do the traditional way, but that doesn't mean an indie director is going to be churning out the likes of Avatar. It can be a good tool, but only in hands of an already good artist, used for speeding up some tedious technical bits.

I'd love to see ED and its partners offer a paid upgrade version of some modules for customers interested in funding the resolution of immersion-breaking issues or encouraging the introduction of new features. A list of potential modules and a customer survey would be helpful. Most of the upgrades would certainly be a success (ATC, Dynamic Campaigns, Terrain improvements). Let's be clear. I'm not saying what's been done so far isn't good, of course. Excellent modules have been produced so far, and ED has delivered on all its promises over time and beyond (see F18, F16, A10, Wardbirds, the fantastic Supercarrier module, the weather system, etc.). However, in my opinion, there are areas that need a boost.

The Oasis driver which will negate the need for the WMR Portal should be coming later this month, the only downside is just for nVidia GPUs: https://www.roadtovr.com/oasis-wmr-driver-release-date-microsoft-pc-vr/

There are no stupid questions, only stupid answers. From the ASC website: "Upon purchase, you'll receive your license code via email within minutes. You'll use this code to instantly activate your C-130J when it's released."

I'm afraid too! I ceased buying modules in fact. Each new one introduces tons of issues that I'll will never see fixed. All of them (ED, UgraMedia, & co.) had better propose a payware enhanced version of their modules for those customers interested in financing fixing those issues instead of releasing tons of new aircrafts and terrains. Surely most enhanced versions would be a hit (ATC, Dynamic Campaigns, Terrain enhancements). I'm not saying that ED is not doing well, of course. So far they have produced great modules and have fullfil promises (see F18, F16, A10, Wardbirds, the great Supercarrier module, weather system, etc.). However, in my opinion, there are areas that need a boost.

Ruheposition ist auch ganz leicht schräg bei mir. Ansonsten ist der collective etwas tiefer als der Sitz positioniert. Ist so angenehm zu greifen. Sind man leider nicht so gut auf den Fotos, aber vielleicht hilft es dir doch.

i think what it is, is that now the kopp message doesnt go away automatically. you have to press the reset button to get it to go away. but the actual fix still works

AI might change this. On Youtube I already see some top tier content where people use AI, like this: AI doesn't replace the need for a human contribution to create quality, but it can make the required effort a lot more manageable.

Would it be possible to fire hellfires like in the video? Thank you.

@MiG21bisFishbedL Excellent write up! Word of note, Sidewinders are coming to the MB-339. [emoji6] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

I've never seen ReShade look good (looking at static screenshots taken on a monitor is vastly different from actually flying in VR), but perhaps that's just me. The obvious problem with using the in-game colour profiles (be it Teal-Orange2 or any other) is that it affects everything, not just ground textures. Also, because of how DCS lighting works, trees and grass will look vastly different in the distance compared to close-by. Yes, I tried the above Teal-Orange2 and it does make the grass look a lot better, but it mutes all other colours, and there's a lack of consistency. The only real solution is for either Ugra to fix this, or for someone (Barthek or CGTC for example) to make a texture pack.

Awsome!

Great job Sushy Are we getting MRTT mod soon in game? Here is recent photo IRL ,Croatian Rafales with French MRTT performin AAR over Adriatic coast..

В 12ом есть УВД из коробки. Но про качество не скажу. Летаю в ИВАО. И, если бы вопрос стоял только в отсутствии УВД в ДКС, я бы, скорее всего, заинтересовался Геркулесом. А вот то, что ему тесно на картах плюс полное отсутствие трасс, схем и тому подобного расстраивает гораздо больше.

Ok, so idiot question. If I purchase from ASC directly will I be able to bind the key I get immediately to my account, or not until the module is released?

Correct. In addition to this also delete the shader caches Saved Games\DCS\fxo and metashaders2 folders to ensure that these are recompiled correctly with changes due to mods.

Yup, the issue with the launcher.sqlite3 file also causes the problem with module names being displayed in Chinese. Same workaround, rename it.