All Activity

..

I've tested just know and it works but sometimes I can't switch beyond WPT0 to get MK9-0 and ultimately WPT 59, instead it will loop back to the last WPT defined. Not sure what I've done wrong in those cases

I was experimenting a bit with this. I learned the LAV-25 only carries 6 troops. So if you have a group of 3 LAV vehicles, for example, then you can still take up to 6 ground pounders per vehicle, but as stated, the ground pounders have to be placed in groups of 6 or less. Also I see that the AAV-7 does embark up to 21 ground troops.

Rename the controller folder for that in your SAVED GAMES folder (or just rename the DCS folder in saved games if you want to test if that fixes it). All the repairs and stuff you did so far will have no impact on your saved games folder files, so haven't touched the issue.

Thank you so much, I was about to give up and throw the thing in the trash!

Not sure what "play with version 2 means". I own BS3 only (i.e. not upgrading form BS2 to BS3). What should I expected if I purchase this. Will it work out of the box with BS3's features?

it would be good if we could get some info on this? Does ED themselves even know I wonder

May I ask what map you used to create the images on the kneeboard? They look so good! I would like to make similar for my own missions in NTTR.

Su-25T.rarШпаргалка в помощь Закинуть папку в C:\Users\.....\Saved Games\DCS\Kneeboard

Release date Friday, 3rd October then, German Unity Day? Would make for a nice present.

again?

I see. Understood. ....but in real life, as seen, the effect is just the same as in the F-15s. There is zero visual difference. F-22 flying in formation with it is not adequate because of the alpha and a low wing load at the flight regime. Obviously the 35 will generate vortexes easier because of the high wing load as you properly pointed out. The demonstration should have been at similar alpha, I think. A-10s are no comparison. DCS already takes into the account the alpha and without any change the F-35 will display the vortexes easier as the system automatically does it by default. You're right about that. In the visual realm, although very nice looking DCS is already, the effect should be upgraded globally. Reason is because they all look the same in DCS, and are too skinny where it should be a thick cylinder like streak as in very humid conditions. F-35s bellow: F-22 bellow: Visually, planes can do exact same visible vortexes effects. So it is where I'd say the effect should be upgraded globally. F-35s can do easier? Yep, I agree. Keyword: easier. F-35s vortexes are longer? Not necessarily. DCS Should have longer wingtip vortexes while its length varying based on air conditions? I agree with it too. I'm all for these improvements in visual goods. I've also noticed the delta winged aircraft are very difficult to generate such effect (rare to non existent in photographs) while in DCS it is easy to do on the M-2000C. So an upgrade/tweak on that front should be also looked at, especially with the Eurofighter coming up.

Virtual Desktop VD

Reset those columns to default. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

29 pilots IRL did get warnings and acted upon them(when SPO was operatuonal). There are some testemomies I alredy posted. I am preparing one with amraam miss at 5nm at the moment. In addition the story of Nebojša Nikolić needs update, since I found later interview and he did not fly in the straight line, but dodged amraam, sparrow and got hit by second amraam at 1.5-2nm range. His description of flight pattern indicates agressive snake-like flight while pushing for the merge.

А зачем? Он же и так PFM. Это если бы его делали full fidelity... Может быть, это даже случится при нашей жизни (в конце концов, там нет ни радара, ни сверхсекретного оборудования)...

Just set up my ET 5 and it works great in every module except for the Hornet and Viper. The column for head tracking is in the controls section but are blank. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers!

Where do these assumptions come from? It seems to me that the only thing ED said was that the SPO-15 won't detect ARH missiles. I mean, it will only detect it a few seconds before impact. And as far as I know, a FOX-1 will not be detected only when, as you mentioned, it's launched via datalink and It might have something to do with range, because AIM-54 might be shoot that far away that signal is to weak for SPO-15 to detect and it will show up just as fighter and only when F-14 radar is doing PDI for AIM-54. The only other thing that comes to mind is that it will also not detect the R-27P/EP, which works similarly to the HARM on ground radars, but in the air. As for the interference of the SPO-15 by the radar, I don't think it is modeled because we have too little information.

?Sorry, but the translation was bad. What are VD applications? Or what does VD stand for?

Sadly, my prior statement is not true .. the battery still dies at around 15 minutes into the mission, as shown on this video (note the cockpit lights go out at around 15:00) And even tough Ground power is connected, it seems to not power all systems, I stop the mission when I realize that the radios are not powered. Guess I could redesign the mission around a Corsair with the engine already on, but it seems like more trouble than it's worth it, so I decided to shelve this mission until M3 fixes this bug Eduardo

Because that's what it is.

И возможность назначать ось на тормоза дать.

Извините, я имел в виду СУ-25Т. Если она работает правильно, то это я видимо не разобрался.

Можно ещё флайтмодель поменять.