All Activity

EAC is great too. Flying events every week & learn as you go with excellent leadership.

It's been reported 7 years ago and it's still not fixed.

As far as I'm aware it wont happen if you start from a cold A/C. Otherwise every time you have to shutdown in order to repair, you're done. LEF stuck. It's crazy that nobody at ED is looking here and doing something to fix this.

Might still use it for now until coop mode is working properly so that I can employ R27R at targets inside 15km more reliably The vertical scan close combat mode radar mode really has trouble locking beaming targets, and you can't slave radar to any of the other close combat modes at the moment.

Да прочли, прочли. «Это система работы автоматики предкрылков и закрылков, что очевидно». Сами то прочтите. На котлеты обсуждения трех кнопок налетели мухи из библиотеки МАИ. Целый рой. Что очевидно.

nullWell, Wags did say it was a bit of a rocket ship in his take-off video

This message I get when open the mission for F-16 in Iraq map - VFR Landing. Never knew why I have yellow triangles in other DCS missions but to receive that message is first. Maybe it wort looking especially with the way MnulliG-29A Fulcrum utilize pylon ordinance?

On the AChS-1M watch The hands of the stopwatch are dark and very hard to read against the background of the dark dial. They are almost invisible in VR. Would you please make the stopwatch hands more contrasting? Thanks null

??? Our version does get Lazur. It shed up on HUD as both HUD left. HDD right

I have attached the track, I hope it will help fix the problem sooner Островная разборка-20250920-132221.zip

IRL gun circle should cover target at 1600m

1. EKV/dummy is an auto mode, if you put Reese there it should turn on automatically when needed 2. yes HMD symbology is same for radar or IRST lock. Two dashed circles. And right now it’s impossible to use radar with HMS. Manual

Unfortunately, erasing the axis doesn't help me, only physically disabling the joystick

Hey @MKdabess, I see this is your first post on the forum. I was drawn back here myself because of the new releases, and I couldn’t help but notice your post. Just to let you know, there have been several attempts to get the developers to review the missile’s performance, but so far they have been unsuccessful. The available sources about the AIM-54 are very inconclusive; many of them contradict each other and can easily be interpreted to “confirm” opposing points of view (some claim the missile was faster, others say it was slower — and all of them are official sources). and this inconsistency is always used to validate the point that is favorable to the argument being defended. What we tried instead was applying pure mathematics and rocket-engine engineering principles. Another forum member with extensive experience in this area demonstrated mathematically and physically that the in-game missile does not behave as it should. He even created a missile-launch calculator showing how the missile’s performance ought to look. The Phoenix had a very distinctive combustion chamber, which produced different thrust levels at different altitudes/pressures due to its grain design (you can find this in the locked thread where we tried to discuss it). In theory, the in-game missile should perform better at higher altitudes than it currently does and maybe a little worse on low altitudes. Also The developers have said that the missile is stuck using an older API and that there’s nothing they can do to improve it for now. The source for the engine thrust data used by developers is also unavailable (it’s said to be classified, and we’re expected to accept that ). I felt compelled to leave this brief summary here, and I wish you the best of luck on your journey. I’m sorry that you expected one quality of product and ended up receiving something different. Because of personal and health issues, I’ve stepped away from this discussion to make the missile more realistic. From what I understand, this effort has since been taken up on the Russian side of the forum and and I didn't follow up anymore. (If I'm not mistaken, at some point, the weapons control part went straight to ED, rather than remaining in the hands of third-party developers.) If you’re interested, look for a user named Tavarish Palkovnik — he has been actively involved in this discussion and kindly provided us with excellent quality material. Just to give you some context, I am posting here a file containing the engine thrust calculations based on engine blueprint so you can get an idea of how far he have gone: (All credits to Tavarish Palkovnik for this) My best regards. pk AIM-54 k=1,2 Rev.pdf

А ещё окно радиостанций пустое

Я тоже не летаю на нем.. Не летаю потому что нет кампаний и миссий. Но отдельную ветку все же можно бы выделить. Ветки МиГ-15, Сейбра, огневого рубежа практически мертвы, но они есть. Как по мне, если аппарат имеет отдельную ветку на форуме, то он привлечет к себе больше внимания. Это лучше чем одинокая тема затерянная среди прочих.

why not show how install it? (i know it)

It will be enough just for the players to be able to move assets from one map to the other.

Увы, речь про Logitech g940, там своя софтина:(

At what range should it work though? Because at some point you will get the icon, that your to line up with the other reticle that is to appear at 1.2km

Awesome!

Специально для Вас пилот. Немного закину.... Любопытные кто хотел узнать чем отличается 9-12 от 9-13. Вот вам покушать принёс.

Campaign FA-18C - Bold Cheetah (Supercarrier) en español https://mega.nz/folder/uDYAFSRZ#Ln5zUytzAMv_LhHgvsC5VQ Campaign F-18C - Task Force Challenger en español https://mega.nz/folder/yahgBCBb#2ewmMWOvAdj2nnre4N8gtA Campaign F-18C - Rising Squall en español https://mega.nz/folder/rXIwkCRL#tDvNiXyrvVWvNw5Laxnz4w Los archivos de traducción de la campaña Rising Squall debes pegar en cada misión .miz abriéndolos con el Winrar, no te envie directamente los archivos de misión porque este es un DLC de pago.

Yes the ranges are off……… but I like it