All Activity

@Grimes will there be a new release of SLMOD after todays patch ? looks like patch has changed something "C:\Users\me\Saved Games\DCS_ca\Scripts/net/Slmodv7_6/SlmodUtils.lua"]:241: attempt to call field 'dostring_in' (a nil value)

Напиши на английскую ветку, я свою ошибку с генераторами написал и мне ответил BN. Так что пиши туда

After this morning's server update, here is the error that pops up. We have 3 servers; this one is our MarianasWWII server. I'll see if this occurs on all 3 of our servers right now. I'll also see if I have the most up to date dcsCommon DML module installed. (see error below) Mission script error: [string "dcsCommon = {}..."]:3189: attempt to call field 'dostring_in' (a nil value) stack traceback: [C]: in function 'dostring_in' [string "dcsCommon = {}..."]:3189: in function 'getMissionName' [string "dcsCommon = {}..."]:3928: in function 'sanity' [string "dcsCommon = {}..."]:3963: in function '?' [string "dcsCommon = {}..."]:3982: in main chunk

No info about that in the update today! Oh man, where is the focus?

The stament has the shame of the F-15C module (I think they has copy/paste them). Honestly, I don't even dream of ED being able to "start" development of the F-35 in 2025. Rather, they'll probably start (if they can) in 2026 or 2027, so they can wait 2 or 3 years until they start (unless someone wants another "disaster" like the F-16 launch). There's still a lot to do on the F-16C/F/A-18C and other modules, so they can focus on a single module, let alone what will remain to be done on the Mig-29A/F-15C, etc, unless we get a surprise and they tell us there's a new team of people dedicated exclusively to it or a significant increase in ED's modern modules staff. It's simply a wait-and-see approach, and much less forget about "promises," since it's only a plan. Regarding the release of a Eurofighter, as long as HB and ED don't confirm a launch... I'm putting it at the beginning or middle of next year at the earliest. In itself, let's take into account his latest statement on Discord.

Сколько уже обновлений прошло...или что нужно сделать чтобы вы смотрели сюда, на борт номера? null

patch is live now we hope you all enjoy!

Same video, another Hornet, smaller Rocket pod: And finally, HERE IS THE MOMENT OF FAIRING BEEN PIERCED BY ROCKET!

^ i agree

I got it to work now. I waited to call my IP inbound until Tally called bomb away. From your mission note to "wait until Tally is in position", i thought she was in position when she calls IP inbound, but she starts off from WP3, calls IP inbound and then moves to position east of the target. She then calls "Weasel 32 in from the east" and drops the bomb. This confused me the first time, as i thought she was in position when calling IP inbound. It takes a lot of time for her to reposition to east of the target. By then i had dropped my bomb already and apparently broke the mission. Otherwise, excellent mission that forces me to convert coordinates, identify targets and coordinate a strike. Finished with 6000 pounds of fuel left. I a missing a BINGO value in the briefing to input for more immersion. I am playing in VR and doesn't use the keyboard very much besides SPACEBAR, since i cant see it, so i had to call repeat 3-4 times on the coordinates to get them right. A suggestion for improvement, would be to display an image with the coordinates/info like Arctic Thunder for F16 does. It makes it easier for VR users to input coordinates. Looking forward to the rest of the missions in the campaign.

Very good module, now I have got control of the Corsair and systems. Landing on carrier ok. I which the aircraft carrier to have more activity as it is now it seems a ghost ship. Also the other war ships are of modern type vessels. It would be nice to have these ships matching the period.

I can't actually give you a true answer on that (not sure what that answer is), but it would be plausible to me that it might time out the USB and put it to sleep at which point it would freeze in game (and it doesn't recover well from such things), but wake the USB port up when you started looking at it in the TIR software. Regardless, it'll take you less than 30 seconds to check and doesn't involve changing any fundamental settings or anything, so what do you have to lose? One other thought - what's it plugged into? Direct into you computer or a powered USB hub? It's also possible (esp. if direct) that it's experiencing a momentary power drop if too much pull on all the USB's which could cause the same as above.

Hey All, Again I have created a mobile kneeboard app. Completely created with AI in flutter, so it supports iOS and Android. I think I coded 4% myself, the rest is all AI. As a iOS programmer for over 15 years, I don't think I will have a job in 2 years or so. Brought to you by Static Chicken, I present DCS Kneeboard. (Also created with AI) The app has no kneeboard content, you can add your desired content yourself. In a nutshell: - Export the folder structure using the app. - On your PC add all your checklists, maps etc - create a zip - in app, import your kneeboard suite. - The in app selected airframe and terrain will determine what is shown on each tab. - Share the zip with friends iOS The iOS version can be downloaded using this link: https://testflight.apple.com/join/YCSaGEts Valid for 90 days. If there is enough interest I will go through the hassle of publishing it in the AppStore. Android Android APK is published at https://github.com/mkoorn/dcs_kneeboard_public/releases I don't have an Android device, hasn't been tested as well as it should. Windows I Also created a small sys tray app for your DCS machine. It lets you pull kneeboard files from the current mission into the app. Also to be found here: https://github.com/mkoorn/dcs_kneeboard_public/releases Below an AI Generated explanation of the app.

is it just me or does anyone else get clicking when moving the stick around?

Hi Guys, @Flappie @NineLine I wrote a post about this in 2020, about the HUD being in bold, blurry large etc while using high resolution. 5 years after nothing has changed... And now on top of that, if we change the values in the lua files by ourselves we don't pass the IC check in MP! Can you PLEASE do something about it, at least give us the option to change the values in the lua without having the IC issue in MP ? Regards Scrat

Yes it's a "simple thing to recreate" in theory, but without a TRACK FILE you're not likely going to get any traction from ED on this (if only because with a track file they can instantly tell if there are any mods installed and stop there instead of wasting time trying to recreate it and discovering it was mod related so they can't -- not saying mods are the issue here, just an example of why the need for a trackfile).

In the case of this helicopter, having pedals is a must. You can fly without them, of course, but it will be difficult and frustrating. This helicopter has no power steering and is very sensitive. It all depends on you (the pilot). When I switched from the Mi-24 to this little thing, I was sure I couldn't fly helicopters. The Cayuse did whatever it wanted. I bought spring-loaded pedals on sale, and they weren't what I expected. Only removing the springs allowed me to have better control. Now I feel more in control of the helicopter.

they're getting cheaper here in aus. Still crazy prices but now the cheapest ive seen is $4500 which is far better than $6500 a few months back

Nothing for any HB modules, seems they need more time. They say so in advance on forums and Discord, this patch is not the one

Indeedely-doodely. Thank you.

steam is being pushed live now

Well, that is the thing about speculation. It's an opinion and you are entitled to it as I am to mine. I see the hubris of Leadership only wishing to deal with immediate effects to its own disaster. Saw it several times in my Military Career. My opinion aligns with Galland and the Field Grade Officers while yours aligns with Flag and Politicians. Why do you think pilot casualties would have risen more than they eventually did by not attacking over the Channel? Casualties would have increased by leveled off at some point to a more sustainable level in my opinion. IMHO, the attacking German fighters would have held the initiative. Their only goal was to get the escort fighters to drop their much needed extra fuel tanks and not necessarily shoot them down. The mere presence of enemy fighters would cause those tanks to be stripped. If they did not drop them then the fight would have been easy as the Allied fighters would be sitting ducks. Sure you could escort them but only to the point the escorts ran out of fuel or require the escorts to carry drop tanks. Then they are in the same boat as fighters escorting the bombers. The range was a huge problem for the Allies. Only the P38 could reach Germany without carrying drop tanks, the rest of the allied designs would have been limited to the coast of France. If the Allies had to concentrate on P38's then your 1000 fighters becomes 500 as production is cut in half because each plane needs two engines. You should read: https://books.google.com/books/about/Luftwaffe_Fighter_Bombers_Over_Britain.html?id=q1zfo63_KRYC Excellent book. It details how roughly 40-50 German aircraft tied down an entire Allied Fleet for much of the war. Post war assessment of the campaign led to a complete shift in modern warfare doctrine. Fortunately, the Luftwaffe lacked any form of effective BDA (Bomb Damage Assessment) combined with Flag and Political Leadership of the Luftwaffe that was incompetent. Without it, the war could have been a whole long longer, more difficult, and more costly. I am not sure what you are talking about here. That chart is not the size of forces sitting on airfields. It is the size of forces in the AIR on individual missions during allied bombing raids.

Is this bug fixed now? The patch notes don't have anything on the F-5, but i'm hoping for a stealth fix. Did anybody check already?

Still waiting for Steam. Days off are fun.