All Activity

I’m not opposed to refunds being issued as store credit, but since I’m using the Steam version, that option doesn’t apply to me. Most of my RB aircraft were purchased after the release of the F-15E, so for me, they’ve only been in use for about a year. And honestly, the state of RB's modules has been quite poor for a considerable amount of that time.

Not a bug. This campaign uses the Stennis and this carrier has no carrier crew since Nov'2024 (introduction of directors crew) - it was supposed to be temporary solution until ED come up with some system dealing with both SC owners and non-owners. As always, no ETA on fixing this situation. https://forum.dcs.world/topic/362975-f-104-video-report-fog-progress-supercarrier-deck-crew-f-16c-arctic-thunder-campaign/

I just noticed that the plane Icons in SimmappPro under "Game Peripheral Display" /MFD for M-2000C, AV8BNR, F-15E and F-15E_WSO disappeared and are replaced by placeholders. I just found out that after setting back my backup everthing is okay, but then after updating DCS the icons disappeared again!? So that problem is related to DCS and hopefully a bug that is gonna be fixed by DCS. So Please fix this DCS, I really don't like it with those placeholders.

So ich bin nun wieder zu Hause und nach wie vor immer noch unzufrieden mit meinem Jittern Hat noch jemand eine Idee was ich dagegen machen kann?

I just found out that after setting back my backup everthing is okay, but then after updating DCS the icons disappeared again!? So that problem is related to DCS and hopefully a bug that is gonna be fixed by DCS.

From a consumer's POV then precisely nothing changed. No comms that work would be resuming. No updates to modules. Not even them going back on sale in their current state. Bear in mind that even if RB intended to start work again at the earliest opportunity then they would have to get people back on board and the lead time (assuming their previous devs even wanted to come back) for that could be above and beyond that six month period.

For AMD users 25.6.1 Anti aliasing is broken. I reverted to 25.4.1 it fixed AA, but now with MSAA on 4x, shadows look trashier, i tried forcing thier quality to ultra in options.lua, it made it somewhat better but not enough. with FSR and TAA on shadows look immensely better, but I get ghosting in WVR and external views when teh camera is moving too fast, and this is unacceptable. Currently I am experincing what the OP mentions, terrible looking shadows on dials and edges in the cockpit, especially when the sun is directly above me. I am going to try a few different drivers now and see what happens

Hi - i have been testing flight models lately and that ensures 100 entries into the same Mission to test and retest and re-re-test etc. The mission i am testing on is using Marianas WWII (for now) and i very frequently see the loading of the mission stuck for ever and the log giving these errors: 578 2025-07-28 06:14:46.656 ERROR GRAPHICSVISTA (Main): Can't open model kousadogwood. 580 2025-07-28 06:14:46.656 ERROR GRAPHICSVISTA (Main): Can't open model lombardypoplar. 582 2025-07-28 06:14:46.656 ERROR GRAPHICSVISTA (Main): Can't open model oak. 584 2025-07-28 06:14:46.656 ERROR GRAPHICSVISTA (Main): Can't open model orange. 586 2025-07-28 06:14:46.656 ERROR GRAPHICSVISTA (Main): Can't open model palmdoum. 588 2025-07-28 06:14:46.656 ERROR GRAPHICSVISTA (Main): Can't open model pine. 590 2025-07-28 06:14:46.656 ERROR GRAPHICSVISTA (Main): Can't open model reddeliciousapple. 592 2025-07-28 06:14:46.656 ERROR GRAPHICSVISTA (Main): Can't open model smallpalm. 594 2025-07-28 06:14:46.656 ERROR GRAPHICSVISTA (Main): Can't open model sugarmaple. 596 2025-07-28 06:14:46.656 ERROR GRAPHICSVISTA (Main): Can't open model sumac. 598 2025-07-28 06:14:46.656 ERROR GRAPHICSVISTA (Main): Can't open model umbrellathorn. 604 2025-07-28 06:14:46.683 ERROR EDCORE (Main): No suitable driver found to mount mods/terrains/marianaswwii/assets/assetstextures.zip 625 2025-07-28 06:14:47.833 ERROR EDCORE (Main): No suitable driver found to mount mods/terrains/marianaswwii/assets/assetstextures.zip 764 2025-07-28 06:14:50.995 ERROR EDTERRAINGRAPHICS41 (36852): missing object declaration: ammunition_box_crash 765 2025-07-28 06:14:50.995 ERROR EDTERRAINGRAPHICS41 (36852): missing object declaration: brick_column_crash 766 2025-07-28 06:14:50.995 ERROR EDTERRAINGRAPHICS41 (36852): missing object declaration: conditioner_03 767 2025-07-28 06:14:50.995 ERROR EDTERRAINGRAPHICS41 (36852): missing object declaration: fence_brick_01_crash 768 2025-07-28 06:14:50.995 ERROR EDTERRAINGRAPHICS41 (36852): missing object declaration: grocery_fabric 769 2025-07-28 06:14:50.995 ERROR EDTERRAINGRAPHICS41 (36852): missing object declaration: mobile_beam_crane_crash 770 2025-07-28 06:14:50.995 ERROR EDTERRAINGRAPHICS41 (36852): missing object declaration: tractor_01_crash 771 2025-07-28 06:14:50.995 ERROR EDTERRAINGRAPHICS41 (36852): missing object declaration: tractor_02_crash 772 2025-07-28 06:14:50.995 ERROR EDTERRAINGRAPHICS41 (36852): missing object declaration: wall_brick_ruined_c02 773 2025-07-28 06:14:50.995 ERROR EDTERRAINGRAPHICS41 (36852): missing object declaration: wall_brick_ruined_c03 787 2025-07-28 06:14:51.049 ERROR EDTERRAINGRAPHICS41 (36852): cant init lDataFileGraphics for type of file = landscape5::SurfaceTile They all look like objects in the marianaswwii asset pack ps. To enhance understanding i might better make a precise description. It is a mission loaded into Mission Editor, that i then try to load into from mission editor by clicking the Small green up arrow in the left side panel (fly mission).

Also, what does this have to do with Steam? The support forum for the Rampagers campaign is here: https://forum.dcs.world/forum/1320-dcs-fa-18c-the-rampagers-campaign/

I still enjoy the AV-8B very much and it's free of critical bug that I am aware of except for this very recent regression affecting multiple aircrafts

Mine's just been delivered. The address on the label is correct and Yamato hadn't already tried to deliver it, so fk knows what Pimax was talking about. Probably sitting there giggling, getting me at it. So, cleared customs on the 12th, I finally get it sixteen days later. I haven't opened the box yet, I've run out of energy.

This is not direct 8NM and it depends on several other factors in DCS. Btw. In this case, the letter T means something else. The person asking has already found the answer, and that's not what you're writing.

It's frustrating to potentially lose access to something you've paid for and used for years. But realistically, for 3 of the 4 modules, they've been available and widely used for a long time. Issuing refunds for long-used products is complicated — especially when there's no clear consensus on who's responsible. Is ED, after passing on payment to Razbam supposed to refund what they've already paid Razbam and pay out of their own pockets? The F-15E is a unique case, and credit to ED for offering store credits. That shows some accountability. But for the rest... I get it - as a consumer, it sucks too. But the situation is that this is bad for all involved. No one is going to win out of this. It's going to hurt everyone. And that's the reality of it. We're all going to lose, consumer, ED, and Razbam. Expectations should be adjusted accordingly. But it's also worth noting that the 'other sim' doesn't support module support between major versions and people may need to buy new modules for the newer versions. 3rd party devs may or may not support updates between - but that's up to the 3rd party dev's, not the 'big name company' that can't be mentioned here. Really, if ED drops support come 3.0 - they're actually only doing what 'the other sim' does anyway. If they carry on the majority of modules through 3.0 - that's actually unusual. If anything - shouldn't that be recognised for the good will that it is? If anything - DCS supporting their modules through major versions deserves recognition that it's more unusual. I'd hate to see ED do a good deed, and it being used as a rod for their back. On the other hand... I would happily pay for a Huey v2 in DCS 3.0 if it was updated.

Many, many thanks!

You have a lot of comparisons before, it's worth following the thread from the beginning, the video you showed has already been posted here several times, including by me, there's no need to double post unless you have something new.

I just tried it, but it didn't work. Still, thank you for your suggestion.

I sincerely hope that this matter can be resolved in the way everyone hopes, but as things stand, it looks increasingly precarious. We might be about to experience another “HAWK” incident — and this time, with four modules. I just hope that if they are truly discontinued after version 2.9, we will be able to get refunds for the AV-8, F-15E, M-2000, and MiG-19. Otherwise, at least for me, I might genuinely leave DCS for good.

I haven’t heard about any changes but it may be better to ask around in the Heatblur forums. I think jester starts the alignment omce both engines are online and you turn on both generators

hi, you may have access now....and yes I know and own Currenthill's russian pack, i was just trying to fix this bug myself...

Ordered 12 Feb, email advising of shipping estimated in May, followed by another email a week later estimating shipping in late June or early July. Email received on 14 July stating headset ready for shipment which would be advised in 7-14 days. Email sent from me requesting shipping update received a response this morning that shipping may happen in 2-3 weeks. If it was ready for shipping 2 weeks ago why will it take a further 5 weeks from then to ship . if I am lucky it might ship in late August so I guess I am looking at September for receipt as the earliest! Not happy - Sorry Pimax you are falling waaaay short on meeting customer expectations.

Sounds a lot like buying a car, then leaving it in the garage for 10 years and expecting it to work as it did on day one, then after 10 years of depreciation decide that because you never used it, expect to get the same value back...

I was on Cold War Contention yesterday, and still had the FPS loss looking north to northeast from Wittstock airbase

Broke the confidentiality clause that went along with the said agreement on at least 3 occasions since late 2024, on at least 2 occasions by Ron Zambrano himself.