Leaderboard

Оп-па, это же я!:music_whistling:

Thanks guys - much appreciated :) .

Happy Birthday mate ! Skol !

Non ! Même si je suis preneur de toute doc, je ne peux de toute façon réaliser un cockpit fonctionnel, donc pas la peine de se prendre la tête avec trop de détails... @Cougar12dk : here are some wires : We'll see later for renders/animations, when I'll consider the model as finished. @Zulu : I project to release a PSD template including swedish, hungarian, czech and south african schemes. Norwegian and danish could be included too, cause they perfectly fit with "stock" nations... ;) @rogue_blade : I don't really understand your question...:huh: @all : many thanks for your encouragements ! :)

With a bit of internet search I am finally able to change any Options in LockOn menu and still keep propper aspect ratio of 1.6 for widescreen monitor and TrackIR problem of stopping working. Here is a sweet solution :D In main LockOn folder there should be a file called lockon.bat. Edit this file and add following lines: @echo off change.com D:\Lock-On\Config\graphics.cfg "aspect = 1.333333373" "aspect = 1.6" Del /f/q Config\TrackIR Del /f/q Input\TrackIR.ini start C:\WINDOWS\Procaff.exe /run 2 "D:\Lock-On\LockOn.exe" exit I think it's quite obvious what the 4 lines of code will do... 1. will reset the aspect ratio from default 4:3 to 10:6 2. will delete TrackIR file from Config folder 3. will delete TrackIR.ini file from Input folder 4. will start LockOn itself on 2nd CPU core* *If you don't use multi core CPU just use "start LockOn.exe" insted. Also the original LockOn.bat file had a line start deleteobsoletefiles.bat which I don't think you need (I just deleted that line). Now, you will only need to get two files: 1. Procaff.exe utility add it to C:\WINDOWS folder download here: http://www.stefan-kuhr.de/procaff/main.php3 2. Change.com utility add to main LockOn folder download here: http://www.golden-triangle.com/CHANGE.ZIP I tested it already and it's working like a charm :thumbup: I've changed the shortcut poiting to LockOn.exe file to this LockOn.bat file... which will in turn reset aspect ratio to 1.6, then delete the 2 TrackIR files, then start LockOn on core 2. So any time I wish to change something in LockOn Options menu within the game itself, this is no longer a problem where I'd have to manually go into each folder and file and make these changes myself... I don't have to do anything... I just restart LockOn via this same shortcut... and things are already set up the way I want them :smartass:

Tillykke med fødselsdagen !! :drunk::sorcerer::beer::yay::juggle::clown_2:

But that's not Su-37!

Do you guys post things like that 'cause you agree with that or to mock the author of those statements. IMHO we should redicule that guy because the parts in bold are so untrue! Firstly, comparing Fulcrum A wing design to Su-37 wing is BS. Remember, Flanker wing designers approached Mikoyan Gurevich back in the '70s but were refused so they turned to Sukhoi. They made a GAW-1 airfoil design! So Flanker wing design was more advanced in terms of aerodynamics, lift and preformance than Fulcrum wing. Simply it had better airfoil! Fulcrum wing design remains unchanged throughout all airframe versions in the past (A,B,C,G,S,UB) but I'm not sure is this the case with naval K versions of Fulcrum (tail section visibly different and folding wings with slightly increased wingspan) and latest MiG-35 which probably has some minor changes but invisible to plain eye view. On the other hand, Flanker's wing was already superior in terms of performance, drag and lift even since the begining. With introduction of a third wing (canards) on Su-33, Su-35, Su-37 and Su-32 main wing airfoil change was neccessary, IIRC lower camber of the main wing was slightly flattened since lift now generates from both canards and main wing. Now what I'm trying to explain here is that comparing Su-37 wing to a MiG-29A wing is a pure nonsense!

It must be the Navy, the groundcrew wearing shorts, LooooL.

It like swimming with sharks. Handcuffed! Well at least MiG pilots were allowed to use both engines!

Нет намеков, ни на кого :) Всего лишь пространное предположение некоей возможной ситуации которая могла бы иметь место быть при определенном стечении обстоятельств) Как в свое время говорил великий древнеримский фило... Короче без обид, я ни накого не намекаю :)

Что за грязные намеки?

it does :)

Скоро будет объявлена дата.

Geier'у мое большое спасибо за организацию! Совсем мало стало вылетов по взрослому.

Alfa girls for an Alfa male .. :D:D Happy birthday Alfa hope you have a good one :thumbup::thumbup:.

Happy Birthday, Jens! Please, accept my best wishes!

Happy Birthday!:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:

Happy Birthday!!!!!!! Good Luck!!!!!!:clap::clap::clap::yay::yay::yay:

someone who can jump in a server (like 169th for example with hills and even awacs)...ignore almost every missile shot on him ...and find and knockout everything what passes his way without even turnin on his radar once... you might say..wtf=? ..... well i can do excatly this....but not cuz im very inventive...cuz i have seen so many things meanwhile to understand what is possible and what might have been used b4. but i wont and i hate this lame kind of playing (for what) and you dont have to be very smart to analyse someones approach in his flight looking tacview or track ..how he is thinking or flying ..if you know these things First there was a publishing from yoda (exploit video) whats wrong Now he made something what fixes it. Would you prefer that these things keep in secret .....only for own usage and might be also a reason not to participate in squad vs squad matches cuz they cant trust anyone....cuz they know how things can be done. there are quiete alot things going around....discoverd and given around from this and that squadron to that squadron....things here what you can change...things there you could use.... etc etc etc and honestly ..if i would just speak bout all what i ve collected over time from others and would publish this... NOONE would have trust OR fun flying lockon anymore.....but thats not the right thing to do. The right thing is to make sure ..that these things just dont work. you might say...exploit is not an exploit as such if both fly under same conditions and can use it or are forced to deal with same issue .. ok ..thats a fair question, but then we dont have to fly BVR as such..then we just open a new thread as "Lockon game tricks" and end up on pages like this http://www.gamecheats.eu/ ...and we say...hey, its just a game. So the choice is: approaching the sim in the most professional way we can or letting it go as .."its just a game" who cares ..lets have fun. choice is yours......but guess what gets boring faster? defining exploiter is really not easy..and i tell you why....some are smart, knowing these things..sharing them "pssst but dont tell anybody"...and using it intentionally..... some dont even know that they exploit the game here and there cuz they dont know better.... therefore its not fair to accuse anybody...but thing are off...we all know it.....we all know how to use them (dont we ,) ...now its time to think bout it honestly. as yoda posted before: Nevertheless after many years online Lo bvr turned into not who was using proper tactics or methods of engagement, but rather who knew the most about the game code and could exploit it. That is the core that LRM attempts to change. The person who reads most theory and exploits his opponents weaknesses (rather than exploiting unforseen weaknesses in the game code) wins. That is also how you can bring this knowledge with you to the next gen flight sims that will undoubtedly require more realistic tactics and approaches to engagements

to Cobrabase: of course, i've found some other screenshots of RICARDO's Hi-Def Su-27 and Su-25T cockpits in another thread on Checksix forum There're some of them, just a little completed I think he was working very hard on all Russian plane's cockpits Hope you complete them as soon as possible, Ricardo :)

When it is done:) (Hehehe, I am the first to say this sentence:) )

He, he, he .... This is one of the funniest statements on this thread.

Хочу заметить, что Coyote выступает как частное лицо. Позиция и точка зрения ED может не совпадеть с мнением партнеров ED.

Hello Ricardo !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Great work !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! are you able to do please a Srceenshot of the cockpit of the SU27 / 33 posten ? many thanks Reno

Э, слищищ, не нада, да! Ещё и в этой ветке!:music_whistling:

БОЛЬШАЯ ИГРА 3 18.10.08 в 22 планируется проведение "Большой Игры".В этот раз сценарий расчитан на 3 группы: 1. 4-Су33 2. 4-Су27 3. 4-Су25 PS.Так же принимаются заявки от желающих летать в синей коалиции.

Additionally, the throttle part of the x52 is the one that has the USB cable. The stick connects to the throttle with a PS2 connection. That alone allows you to use the throttle by itself. All CH products are they're own unit. You could, for example, use the Pro Throttle with a Saitek Cyborg.

LOL i think you'll know by now that this has been the case LONG before the LRM work came along, i cannot see it making things any different :) If anything this work brings more variety into the MP scene, and i'm sure there will be other servers that will not use this mod, end result being the player has the choice of 'vanilla' lockon and, well, 'real'. Everyones a winner! :thumbup:

NICE ONE :thumbup:

I am hoping for RvE to organize some LRM event in the near future. It could be a simple side vs side game without respawn... or.....an even where it takes 5-10 minutes to rearm or respawn First team to land at enemy home base wins. Any thoughst? :)

Hey, I have a question. In reading the PDF you guys say you all realized that LOMAC will not be patched any further. Are you guys just making a very educated guess or has ED specifically said this?

The 104th runs it too. May I ask on what you base this statement because as I posted above, there hasn't been any negative feedback from people who have tried it. On the opposite- everyone agrees it totaly improves gameplay.

Thanks for dissing long hours of checking with source material from USAF and Russian Airforce, talk with pilots who flew at least some of those machines, and the effort it took to actually create this mod. You're just like everyone else who comes in with their 'you're just speculating' theory. No, we are not. The goal was to enforce more realistic BVR combat as hinted at or directly described by those source materials and said pilots, and it worked.

I can understand some not wanting to adjust to various changes made on a server side mod to different aircraft. Afterall we have had several years to become comfortable with the status quo of aircraft and missile performances. To some, this mod severely effects their style of play, while others will need to make minor adjustments. It is just a matter of giving it a try with an open mind. How many servers are running with this mod at the moment? I was under the impression it was just the RVE server.

Jeez Boberro you’ve nailed it. Hitman go easy. On your arm.:D

Then I suggest saving a few euro's a month for the next couple months until you can afford new; if you MUST buy a used one, go for an X-52 (prefferably Pro) and make sure you can return it if its faulty. And yes, they are worth that money!

:yay: You're catching up to me, now! Have a good one!!!

Happy Birthday you lucky dog!!:thumbup::thumbup: :D:D

Glad you got it. LO Gold is the same except for copy protection I believe. Individual squads have their own setups, flying in Hyper Lobby's various servers and their own internal missions/training, mutli-squad matches and events as well. I'm sure you'll find it similar to WB except maybe a smaller community. Squad list at Grizzly's Cave: http://www.serik.dk/page2.html

I'm not quite sure I screwed balance here in favor for realism. However, in the future, if you'd like me to have a look at making more hardcore version of LRM where MRMs go mach 4-5 instead of flying the same speeds and ranges as the real life test data of old versions of Aim-9...there may be some possible solutions ;). I've been thinking of a few funny methods.

lol whos the poor soul who voted option 1?! :D

Brilliant!! Out

Realism for teh win!!! :D

IBTL :bye:

И АБРИС.

Ah Pilotasso ... Why do I get the feeling that if someone said the Russians make good vodka, you'd say the Americans invented it & make it better (& ask why anyone would want to drink Vodka anyway :-)