Leaderboard

Категорически поздравляю всех! Готовивших, ждавших и дождавшихся! :) Авансом могу поздравить тех, кто в первых рядах... да чего там! Кто приобретет Акулу после ее появления на прилавках магазинов. Ура! "Будем жить!" ©

Русская версия DCS Ка-50 Черная Акула ушла на золото вчера.

Reason I am neither in favior or against (totaly) of this mod is because I think some of the things it's trying to fix are good, but some are not. The IFF on the F-15 is existant and it's not in LockOn... so you've added this functionality by a workaround.. fair enough... I suport this. The TDS should stay on last position when radar lock is lost... again, some of guys know 100% this is how F-15 radar works so again you've added this feature.. fine, again I suport it. What I don't suport is these "estimates" which no one really has any propper means of obtaining (unless someone actually has military test results if they were ever conducted for things like this) how often and how far, etc etc your lock will be lost if you fly that high, etc etc. I don't agree with this because it's nothing but guessing... also you can say some radar's are known to have better look-down, shoot down capabilities then others, but again this is just speculation on your part and again I do not agree it should be added like this... I'd rather leave things like this as they are. The automated flaps and gear... this is not adding to realism, au contraire, it's going away from realism because real aircaft do not have automated gear retraction. Flaps might but then definitely not on all aircraft and definitely not on older generation fighters... things might jam and mulfunction because of missusage by the pilot... but this mod does not address this in this manner. And again, if you could add actual mulfunction of the system like flaps jamming becasue of excessive speed then you still need real world data (actual tests) to know what conditions cause what mulfunctions. Lots of data like this is also most likely clasified or if not hard to obtain unless you have some contacts in the military... and even if you did you can't have refferences for things like this for all the aircrtaft we have in this sim which would bring us again to, yeah you've guessing it... guessing. This is why again I'd like to leave things like auto flaps/gear out. I'm not done giving my opinion on other things (like side lobes and how much effect they actually have, at what altidude, radar elevation etc) but I just want to make a point that this mod sure does have good things which we all like to have (noted in first 2 sections in my post) but some don't, so I don't understand either why you guys push so much to have everyone fly this mod. I admire your knowledge and dedication you've put into this Yoda (and others working with him) but I for one would like to have things "fixed" and used if we all know and agree will bring us to how things work in real world. So bring on the IFF and auto-antena-slew and bring on the auto flaps also (if the actual aircraft has this feature) but if it doesn't don't use it. Also guesses are not really doing much for me either... I'd rather you come up with concept of how real thing works, what effects it and how and to what extent (if you can come up with this info, and if you can cudos to you) then make a formula to calculate this and if you can do that then I say do it... but I think this is close to impossible. right, I'll stop yapping on about... I hope you see my point...

РЕЕБЯЯЯТАААА!!!!!! Дата релиза 17 октября!!!!!:cheer3nc::cheer3nc::cheer3nc::shocking::notworthy::notworthy::bounce::clap::clap::punk: http://games.1c.ru/ka50_black_shark/

Started to make skins out of nothing to do and BS (not the Bull S**t) still not being out... :unsure: Second attempt...

Are these official? ED seems to be a bit buttoned up today.

Валера, без тебя многого не было бы в Акуле! симметрично - с выпуском! :)

Поздравляю разработчиков с первой реализацией замыслов DCS! Была проделана большая и сложная работа на пути к новому уровню детализации моделирования, организации симулятора, технологии разработки и тестирования. Есть хороший задел и перспективы для дальнейшего развития. Выросли уникальные специалисты с огромным опытом. DCS - это уже совсем не игрушка, хоть и игра. Ура! :)

here

Hi, Here I show you some screenshots after having edited the graphical configuration. All that thanks to Viper, which helped me in the forums of Lockonfiles, @Viper: I'm ArminvanBuren :thumbup: Enjoy! S!

1. RTFM 2. Try RTFM 3. More practics :)

Or in cloud. That's how it's meant to work in the 29/27- slaving the radar to the EOS. For sneak attack in close range you use the EOS while radar is on stand-by, your bandit goes into a cloud, in that moment the radar automaticaly takes over to not lose him and give warning. You go out of the cloud and the radar goes quiet again, automaticaly. Note, in both cases the two systems exchange data (bandits last known position)so you don't lose lock. The radar is not emitting but it knows where to look when called. I imagine that require a lot of new physics modelling which, apparently, won't happen in LO. Hopefully in DCS...

What Ulrich means is, those are the wrong values. Yes. They are low.

No. If you add something to the antenna it becomes a totally different antenna, with a different radiation diagram. You might have reduced the amount of radiation from one direction, but you have also done thing to the main lobe (probably moving it and reducing it).

Ok, i can accept the exaggeration as a tool for the end goal, but please be more careful when giving it a "back story". I mean... look-down.. at 20m? :) :) :) First, the reason it doesn't suffer from side-lobes is not it being a passive system (which it isn't entirely, the ranging is done by a very active laser), but it being an optical system. Second, passive systems also have sidelobes. They are determined by the antenna, and they are there both when transmitting and receiving. I know it can't be perfect, but I'm only trying to help you make it better. Even if it's just making the docs better, even if no one reads them:)

Ура, товарищи!!! Поздравляю ED и всех, кто ждал все эти годы!

Ненене :D Сам Чиж обещал!:) Вы только представьте себе форум после 17го... Триммера на Су-25 нервно курят в кулак за углом в трех кварталах отсюда :megalol: Модераторам придется уходить в отпуск с реальных мест работы и переходить на усиленный режим модерирования форума сменяя друг друга на сон)) Нужен хотябы начальный FAQ основанный на данных от тестеров.

I'll buy at least two copies as soon as english version is available.

Поздравляю ED и всех нас ! :)

Речь шла об обоих: Апаче и Тандерболте втором. Кто выйдет раньше - не говорилось, но есть у меня подозрение, что таки А-10, по нему а)все-таки есть некоторые наработки (А-10С делали для буржуинов) б)нет проблемы двухлетчиковости.

Блин, писец, ну мне везёт, как всегда. Ждал 3 года, дождался. И когда? Как раз тогда, когда над курсовым проэктом нада работать. Впрочем это не беда. Всё равно мой ПК судя по минимальным "Акулу" не потянет...

А разве речь была не о Апаче?

"Тандерболт".

Я верил. Я знал.

УУУРРРАААА!!!!!

Абалдеть! :D Поздравляю коллектив ED и всех, кто ждал этот шедевр! Знаковое событие, УРА!!! :)

Приятная новость :)

Спасибо сотрудникам компании ЕД и их партнерам и тестерам! Они постарались на славу!!! И слово насчет осени сдержали!

Again from your post i can see you are here for nothing but the banter. I haven't read a single objective thing in there. You talk about "fits your personal concept of reality" and if u actually read through this entire thread, you would realize that these things implemented are as close to realism as Lockon's code allows us to get. Don't sit there and lecture about things you have absolutely no clue about, you are doing a big disservice to the people that actually look for information on this thread, as I have said before and im saying again, I havent read a single objective thing in any of your posts regarding this modification. The mere fact that you post nonsense in different words every single post is testimony enough to the fact you have no clue about what you are talking about. So here is my next question to you, have you actually gone through the Mod manual to see what it fixes? Because i suspect that's a big NO too? Ehhh.... More i read More im shocked at the ignorance

Спасибо модераторам! Извините, на радостях не сообразил создать отдельную ветку:doh: Спасибо разработчикам, за наше счастливое.... (без иронии) Жду не дождусь следующей пятницы - и на Савелу:smilewink:

This springs to mind...

Грех не обмыть тАкое дело:sorcerer:,представляешь Андрей сколько может народу в Москве собраться ! В книгу Гинеса попадем...надо только с местом и временем определится. Немного странно ,Но канал Геймплей - Первый игровой об этом пока молчит.

Обмывать будем после английского релиза, который сейчас делаем.

Это правда? http://games.1c.ru/

У Су-27 есть ИЛС??? Аааа!:D

Валерий, спасибо! Это - и ваша работа.

Спасибо Валера! Тебя также.

It's the term used when the devs have finished the product and are sending it off to be pressed. So it means it's all done and dusted...or at least that's what it meant before the internet came out, now it tends to mean it's working and EA is biting our asses to get the game out in whatever condition it is in before the pirates get hold of it and if your lucky your we are going to be patching it for a few months, unless of course EA want us to start on the next version in which case it will stay broke but the EA Sports * 2010 patch will fix the problems, it will just cost you another £40. In a nut shell :D Regards Paul

http://translate.google.de/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fforums.eagle.ru%2Fshowpost.php%3Fp%3D537924%26postcount%3D2119&sl=ru&tl=en&hl=de&ie=UTF-8 Great news, and congrats to the whole Eagle staff for achieving this, must be a very relieveing moment!

УРА УРА УРА!!!!3 года ожидания подошли к концу!!!!Спасибо ЕД за разработку.Жду не дождусь когда поставлю ее на комп!!!!Спасибо еще раз!!!!!!!!

1C развозят диски по магазинам начиная с Дальнего Востока. Я думаю, 17-го игра будет во всех областных и краевых центрах точно.

Yoda, I just flew a bit in 104th and noticed while in Su-27 I could not lock a guy at 10km bellow me because even though I could see him on radar my vertical radar elevation was "spiking" up and down... it was not stable for me to have the contact on radar even 1/2 sec... by the way I use Cougar Antena Axis for radar elevation.

Then wind down with this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7654267.stm lol

No - what the material in the post =RvE=--AS-- made actually said was : And so when =4c= Hajduk Veljko He's not clutching at straws, he's pointing out a factual error in =RvE=--AS-- 's statement...

This is such a great community. I really appreciate not being laughed off the map. Some online sites the people would just look at a question of "the notch" as an insult. I 've heard of the term and knew it was a radar blind spot but I had forgotten it was due to doppler effect. Just rusty I guess. The ground clutter is something I never thought was modeled so I disregarded it. Shame on me for watching History Channel's "dogfights" on DVD and not considering "Duke" Cunningham downing MiGs with the sparrow (booo!) only when they had an empty sky behind them. I came home early today (wife in bed sick... okay but not well). Took care of her and then decided to try what you gents recommended to me when I had some time. It bloody works! Wow do those Alamos track now! I was only able to fly a bit before duty called but this is so encouraging. Once again this little international group of cyber aviators shows how bright it can shine. Thanks guys. "Fighter Combat" by Robert Shaw (circa 1985) arrived today from Amazon. In between grading high school papers I'll escape into a good tutoring.

Umm.. Wait a minute... Boneski have u actually flown online? Btw just so u know, no servers online have "AI Wingmen" sorry what planet are u on again and what game are u playing?

While I admire the skills and dedication of the aerobatic teams the second part of your sentence causes nothing but laugh. If you really believe those words then I have nothing more to say to you, concerning flight sims in general.

Bingo! :)

Что за грязные намеки?

Unfortunately the reason this works is that it affects your own aircraft. LUA does not provide access to functions that would affect the AI. :( This mod is MP-only by the limitation of the tools at hand.